Why I’m excited about Yarn

Today, Facebook — in collaboration with Google and others — released Yarn, a new package manager for JavaScript.

In comparison to npm, the Yarn website pushes these three main benefits forwards:

  1. Speed
  2. Reliability
  3. Security

Not in that list, and something that I’m really super excited about, is the fact that Yarn is architected in such a way that it basically is a drop-in replacement fornpm (the binary) itself. Yarn does not bring extra fatigue to the JavaScript game:

  • You don’t need to learn an entirely new (*) syntax (unlike the switch from grunt to gulp to webpack).
  • You don’t need to find your packages on a different repository/website (unlike the switch from bower to npm).
  • You don’t need to change your directory structure (Yarn still usespackage.json and puts everything in the node_modules subfolder).

For us, the end user, not much changes. Everything that was, still is. From a UX perspective that can count.

Working with Yarn: “It’s a Unix System, I know this!”

(*) I know. The syntax is a tad different, but not that much: Once yarn is installed, just run yarn (or yarn install) instead of npm install. To add a package to your package.json run yarn add packagename(instead of npm i packagename --save). Slightly different indeed, but nothing big.


Of course I’m also excited about the initial benefits listed. Take reliability for example. Coming from a PHP background — where we have Composer for dependency management — I applaud the fact that Yarn — like Composer — automatically generates lock files.

Thanks to the yarn.lock file you can no longer end up with different versions of dependencies on different machines should a new version of a dependency be released in between two runs of yarn install. The lock file, as its name indicates, locks the dependencies down to exact versions (cfr. npm shrinkwrap, but then by default and on steroids). That way you have reproducible installs, on all machines.

The magic clue behind it? Whenever you run yarn install, the yarn.lockfile has precedence over the package.json.

  • If the yarn.lock file exists, the (exact) versions defined in it will be used.
  • If no yarn.lock exists, the (loosely defined) versions defined inpackage.json will be used, and a yarn.lock is generated.

That way you, as a developer, have true control over which exact versions will be installed on every machine. As long as you commit your yarn.lock file into Git (or whatever VCS floats your boat) of course.

Let me rephrase and repeat that for you, as it’s really important: you must commit the yarn.lock file into Git.

To update the versions locked in the yarn.lock file run yarn upgrade. After having verified that your project Works On My Machine™, it’s safe to commit the updated yarn.lock file into Git.

Oh, and about the aforementioned speed benefit (thanks to parallelization and the use of a global cache on disk), let this tweet convince you:

So, what are you waiting for?

Facebook Engineering Blog: Yarn: A new package manager for JavaScript →
Yarn — Fast, reliable, and secure dependency management →


This is a blogpost which first appeared on my blog at https://www.bram.us/2016/10/11/why-im-excited-about-yarn/

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.