The War on Surveillance

In Dave Egger’s novel “The Circle”, security monitoring is a major issue. The act of constantly watching everyone’s actions to assure no one is doing anything that is dangerous, out of the norm, or harmful to anyone is looked at as a positive act. Secrets are considered dangerous, privacy is considered unsafe. Everyone’s actions should be available for the world to see and everything should be open. The characters of “The Circle”, with the exception of a few, feels if everyone is being watched there is a lesser chance people with comment crimes. Having a constant eye on a person can change a person action throughout daily life. People will most likely become more aware on the things they do and say if they know they are constantly being watched.
Throughout the “The Circle” one can see just how deeply the characters in the novel feel about their point of view on privacy. They are very grounded to their beliefs. The Circle, witch is a big time company with the intentions on changing the world by making secrets and privacy a thing of the past, look at their work as being helpful. Members of the circle do not see the faults in what they are doing but only the benefits. Circle employees believe that they can better the world by the use of surveillance. “SECERTS ARE LIES, SHARING IS CARING, PRIVACY IS THEIFT” (The Circle 305). In todays society there is a debate on wither surveillance could help decrease crime and better the actions of individuals. A person might be less likely to commit a crime or do anything that may be looked at as negative if they know they are being watched. People tend to be a little more aware and cautious about the things they do and say when they know there are praying eyes starring at them. In Egger’s novel the use of cameras throughout the world within “The Circle” monitor hundreds and thousands of people each day. Video feeds from these cameras stream over the web and is made accessible to everyone. It is hard for someone to commit an act that may be dean as unfit if they know for sure they are being fully monitored and can be easily identified. It then becomes easier for one person to sit and think before actually acting on a thought.

With the recent trouble of police officers in today’s society the big question comes into play about wither police offices and their actions should be monitored. The discussion on wither police officers in today’s society should where body cameras continues. This brings in the point that Egger tries to make within his novel “The Circle”. If police officers are being monitored there is a increased chance that officers of the law will do everything to code. There will also be a decrease in crooked police officers. If all is monitored, evidence of any unlawful actions or racism shown from an officer will all be on film as evidence. It will provide an accurate record of events for people of power, and even the people of America to see. With the raising violence we are seeing from officers, something must be done to monitor the men in blue to assure that all is being done by the book.
“The fatal shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014 sparked calls for body cameras for police officers. Police officers in Ferguson began wearing body cameras when dealing with protests following Brown’s death. In December 2014, the Obama administration proposed a number of reforms for police departments, including $75 million in federal funding over three years to equip police officers with body cameras.”
Forcing officers to wear body cameras to keep records of events will decrease deaths by officers. Officers will less likely break any rules and will be less reckless if they know that after the events someone can just look back and see the event for himself or herself. More people will be held responsible for their actions since the evidence will be video record of any incident right there for the world to see. Doing wrong, or doing anything that is considered bad is really no longer a choice when you are being fully monitored. If eyes are on you all the time there is no getting away with crime.http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.storm.hgtc.edu:2048/eds/detail/detail?vid=2&sid=cfcd612d-d7fa-4d0b-8e5f-96346010f921%40sessionmgr106&hid=113&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU= — AN=101989974&db=pwh
Eamon Bailey, a character in “The Circle” who is an employee, states in a presentation “In a world where bad choices are no longer an option, we have no choice but to be good” (The Circle 292).
Often times video surveillance have provided video evidence that lead to the conviction of many criminals. This is one of the reasons why video surveillance could help reduce crime. In Egger’s novel, Mae was caught stealing a kayak. When she was caught on camera she was asked if she would of stole the kayak had she known she was being watched, she answered no. This is an example of how a person will be more cautious of his or hers actions if they are honestly being monitored. In order for this to become reality, one will have to give up privacy of some sort. In Tampa Florida government official are experimenting with cameras and facial recognition. The system being tested is a 36-camera system that is set up around the city. The system grabs digital snapshots of strollers and then electronically compares them to the database of 30,000 mug shots of criminals and runaways. http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA76832984&source=Bookmark&u=horrygtc&jsid=44c60aa5ea57db3dcfb5991202fc9dae
“Implicit in this heinous technology is the ability of a government to monitor the whereabouts of every single citizen from second to second,” said Patrick Gunkel.
Having a system to monitor people constantly could be the key to reducing crime and keeping an eye on criminals and even getting people of interest off the streets.As the debate over surveillance today continues, the question of how much is too much comes into play. As time goes on our look on privacy diminishes. Every day people are sharing more and more of their information on the Internet. The war on security and privacy continues, but privacy already lost.
“Google collects personal information, data about the services you use and how you use them, server logs (exactly the kind of thing the NSA was after), location information, data about the software you use, storage data and other identifying information that third parties may store on the hardware you use to access cyberspace. That is an awful lot of information when all you want to do is make a call, play a game or write a letter” (Eric Sterner). http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-security-vs.-privacy-debate-is-already-over-and-privacy-lost/article/2545407
People want to feel safe but want their privacy too. The problem is, we cannot have both. Think about how life will be if there was no surveillance at all. How will having no watchful eyes or recorded evidence affect our world? Imagine not having cameras or surveillance in restaurants, banks, gas stations, or ATMs. Egger tries to hit on positive points to how surveillance will decrease crime in the world and how people will be less likely to commit crimes knowing that someone or multiple people are watching every thing they do.
