Summarizing for Civ: 538988

1. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 1 U.S.C § 112a –

1 U.S. Code § 112a — States Treaties and other International Agreements; contents; admissibility in evidence:

(a)

The Secretary of State shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and published, beginning as of January 1, 1950, a compilation entitled “United States Treaties and Other International Agreements,” which shall contain all treaties to which the United States is a party that have been proclaimed during each calendar year, and all international agreements other than treaties to which the United States is a party that have been signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other final formality has been executed, during each calendar year. The said United States Treaties and Other International Agreements shall be legal evidence of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and agreements, therein contained, in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the Territories and insular possessions of the United States.

(Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1001, § 2, 64 Stat. 980; amended Pub. L. 103–236, title I, § 138, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 397; Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, § 7121(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3807.)

The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s the Paris Peace Accords in January 27, 1973 that Secretary of State Kissinger who was advisor and to be Secretary of State of the U.S.A. Why did he not carry on this Paris Peace Accords for the Vietnam War?

The Secretary of State shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and published, beginning as of January 1, 1950, a compilation entitled “United States of America

2. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 1 U.S.C § 112b;

(a)

The Secretary of State shall transmit to the Congress the text of any international agreement (including the text of any oral international agreement, which agreement shall be reduced to writing), other than a treaty, to which the United States is a party as soon as practicable after such agreement has entered into force with respect to the United States but in no event later than sixty days thereafter. However, any such agreement the immediate public disclosure of which would, in the opinion of the President, be prejudicial to the national security of the United States shall not be so transmitted to the Congress but shall be transmitted to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives under an appropriate injunction of secrecy to be removed only upon due notice from the President. Any department or agency of the United States Government which enters into any international agreement on behalf of the United States shall transmit to the Department of State the text of such agreement not later than twenty days after such agreement has been signed.

The petitioner would like to ask the Secretary of State Kissinger, Why did he not transmit this the text of any international agreement’s Paris Peace Accords to Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives under an appropriate injunction when our government of the United States of America has signed it?

3. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 1 U.S.C § 113:

1 U.S. Code § 113 — “Little and Brown’s” edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and Other International Acts Series; admissibility in evidence:

The edition of the laws and treaties of the United States, published by Little and Brown, and the publications in slip or pamphlet form of the laws of the United States issued under the authority of the Archivist of the United States, and the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence of the several public and private Acts of Congress, and of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 636; Pub. L. 89–497, § 1, July 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 271; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)

____________________________________________________________

The petitioner would like to ask Secretary of State Kissinger why did the government of the united States of America has been performed International Agreement for the South Vietnam in December 23, 1950 and perform the Paris Peace Accords when our government of the united States of America directly operations in the South Vietnam?

4. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 1 U.S. Code § 112 — Statutes at Large; contents; admissibility in evidence

The Archivist of the United States shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and published, the United States Statutes at Large, which shall contain all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during each regular session of Congress; all proclamations by the President in the numbered series issued since the date of the adjournment of the regular session of Congress next preceding; and also any amendments to the Constitution of the United States proposed or ratified pursuant to article V thereof since that date, together with the certificate of the Archivist of the United States issued in compliance with the provision contained in section 106b of this title. In the event of an extra session of Congress, the Archivist of the United States shall cause all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during said extra session to be consolidated with, and published as part of, the contents of the volume for the next regular session. The United States Statutes at Large shall be legal evidence of laws, concurrent resolutions, treaties, international agreements other than treaties, proclamations by the President, and proposed or ratified amendments to the Constitution of the United States therein contained, in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the Territories and insular possessions of the United States. (July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 636; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1001, § 1, 64 Stat. 979; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 3, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)

_____________________________________________

To follow with this statute of the United States of America, the petitioner would like to provide to these Archivists of our American leaders that our President Nixon’ and President Kennedy’s tapes tape and secretary of state Kissinger when they are secretly discussing for the Vietnam War. Please see:

a, Nixon’s letter to Nguyen Van Thieu (17 December 1972)

b. Boston (November 24)- the Kennedy Library has released 37 hours of tape recordings of meeting..

c. Kissinger: , he has declared, “Vietnam failures we did to ourselves,” Former secretary of state Henry Kissinger discusses his controversial career “Tags” “mistakes were made” by America in Vietnam War, but said he had no regrets about his actions.

5. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 75 U.N.T.S. 135

Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950.

Article 1

The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances.

GENERAL PROTECTION OF PRISONERS OF WAR

Article 12

Prisoners of war are in the hands of the enemy Power, but not of the individuals or military units who have captured them. Irrespective of the individual responsibilities that may exist, the Detaining Power is responsible for the treatment given them.

Prisoners of war may only be transferred by the Detaining Power to a Power which is a party to the Convention and after the Detaining Power has satisfied itself of the willingness and ability of such transferee Power to apply the Convention. When prisoners of war are transferred under such circumstances, responsibility for the application of the Convention rests on the Power accepting them while they are in its custody.

Nevertheless if that Power fails to carry out the provisions of the Convention in any important respect, the Power by whom the prisoners of war

were transferred shall, upon being notified by the Protecting Power, take effective measures to correct the situation or shall request the return of the prisoners of war. Such requests must be complied with.

_______________________________________________________________

The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s prisoner of war because he was detained by the government of the United States of America that has been issuing more statutes of the United States of America that’s so-called foreign Assistance act to the South Vietnam. For sample, HR. 5490 and HR. 7885 . For him realize to those statutes of the United States of America have enacted to persuade the South Government or so-called is Republic of Vietnam that must fight anti- communism in order to protect for safety of the American people and the United States of America that seemed to right policy because Republic of Vietnam is backward country when the United States of America is super modern nation, so the backward country must be forced by the super nation’s the United States of America. However, the Kissinger did not perform those statuates of the United States of America, but he has sold off Republic of Vietnam to communism in order to protect to core of interests of the United States of America when the “America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests.” So the petitioner would like to ask Mr. Kissinger and the whole American people some questions, ” What did the petitoner have crime with all of the American people and Mr. Kissinger when the government of the united States of America and Mr. Kissinger did not only destroy properties the family and the life of petitioner but also sell of his nation to communism? In fact, after President Kenedy has ordered to his Embassy in Saigon that it supported to coup the Ngo Dinh Diem regime; and then, the United States citizens have come to the South government operating anti — communism, but did not fight to anti — communism, it big cannons of the American troop have murdered to his family was broken when the father of petitioner was murdered by the big cannons of the United States of America, but the United States of America did not compensate any pennies to his family when the landscape of the petitioner was broken and his family numbers were separated each others by the Statutes of the United States of America were Hr. 5490 and H.R 7885. When the petitioner has come to the United States of America, he was a modern slavery because he is a Prisoner of War of the Vietnam War. He was training for a slavery job, but the American mental cases and crimes have receiving the salary, yet the petitioner was only paid $36.00 (thirty six dollars) by the County of San Mateo during the petitioner has had not only sculptor but also is Prisoner of War of the Vietnam War, but therefore the County of San Mateo did not consider for it which is why did Mr. Kissinger protected his core of interests of the United States of America and results of Mr. Kissinger trampled to properties, happiness, and core of interests of the petitioner down that are of Human rights, the American justice, and the American democracy of the United States of America doing by Mr. Kissinger ?

1, Certificate of Dismissal from camp Number’s 293 GRI of Socialist republic of Vietnam

Peace- Freedom and Happiness

2, a picture’s Lieutenant Police of Republic of Vietnam of Bright Quang since 1972, he graduated from University Police of Republic of Vietnam.

5. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s H.R. 5490

Bibliographic information

Foreign Assistance Act of 1963: Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Eighty-eighth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 5490, to Amend Further the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and for Other Purposes …
 Part 1 of Foreign Assistance Act of 1963: Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Eighty-eighth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 5490, to Amend Further the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and for Other Purposes, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs

According to First Session, on H.R. 5490 from page’s 193,196 and 214 to page 771, 772, and 775

That the petitioner would like to provide evidence’s Hearing, before the Committee on Foreign Affairs House of Representatives, the term of the Eighty — eight Congress, so Senator of the United States of America who is Mansfield has had a question 3 ‒ Even so good a friend of Vietnam as Senator Mansfield recently reaffirmed his respect for you, while complaining against ” authoritarian rule.” How do you interpret the Senator’s remarks? Answer ‒ I have already dealt with the problem of democracy underdevelopment which not only Vietnam but all the underdeveloped countries have to face, and with different ways in which these countries have sought to solve this historic problem during the last 20 years. I have said how South Vietnam, while fighting a war and carrying out a revolution, endeavors for its part to reduce this fundamental contradiction between liberty and a forced march forward (U.S. News & World Report of Feb. 18, 1963). In his opinion that the promises of the government of the United States of America looked like a nail iron put into a wooden tree, the Partnerships of the government of the United States of America and the government of Republic of Vietnam are friendships confirmed by a statute of the government of the United States of America’s H.R. 5490 that had surely confirmed the backward of Republic of Vietnam. Those partnerships were to be good quality of friendship each other without opposites each other and therefore, the United States citizens quickly have sent to Vietnam in order to perform for agreement signed in December 23, 1950. As a result, the petitioner has said, “The rules of law are not distorted by whomever.” Because the Kissinger has acknowledged in himself, he has said, “His mistakes were made by America in Vietnam War but said he has no regrets about his actions in the war” at the Lyndon B. Johnson School on Tuesday.

6. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s H.R. 7885:

Public Law 88–205, 88th Congress, H.R. 7885, December 16, 1963: An Act to Amend Further the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and for Other, in fact, Public Law 88–205, 88th Congress, H.R. 7885, December 16, 1963: An Act to Amend Further the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and for Other Purposes; therefore, To base on H.R. 7885, that’s statute involves to the petitioner because of the government of the United States of America is as important as partnerships and corporate governance of both governments because Public law 88–205 -December.16, 1963 or so-called is H.R. 7885, Section 407 has spoken that No department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this Act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational institution. Approved December 16, 196³¹, 11 am Lets petitioner prove that government of the united States of America has been supported expansion Assistance, or so-called is Development loan fund and Military Assistance in order to persuade the government of South Vietnam that should be victory communism and then the army of the United States of America will return homeland, but not sell the South Vietnam to communism, not betray each other, and not build chaotic situation of South Vietnam because statute’s H.R. 7885 and section 407 of the United States of America has confirmed this: it is the sense of the congress that assistance authorized by this act should be extended to or withheld from the government of South Vietnam, in the discretion of the President, to further the objectives of victory in the war again communism and return to their homeland of Americans involved in that struggle.” Significantly, petitioner would like to be proudly welcoming to the government of the United States of America when it does not only send the United States citizens to Vietnam but also support the many financial aids to Vietnam in order to delete the backward of Vietnam. It’d persuade to the Vietnamese people who struggle to defeat communism. It shall help Vietnam to have freedom, democracy and justice. But ironically, the government of the United States of America could not yet defeat communism out of the South Vietnam, it sold off the South Vietnam to communism. In the meanwhile, super partnership of the government of the United States of America with the government of Republic of Vietnam that seems to forgettable of its 1 Circuit &112a and Agreement signed at Saigon December 23, 1950; Entered into force December 23, 1950 because both partnerships are synonymous to American President Kennedy and Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem, they are together eating one Holy cake, drinking together Holy water and together adoring one God. On the other hand, one side of super partnership is the government of the United States of America that’s secretly sending his conversation is recorded November 4, 1963 by JFK tapes¹ while he is saying, “Kennedy dictates a memo seeming to regret the assassination of South Vietnam’s President Ngo Dinh Diem, following a coup Kennedy endorsed. — Only weeks before his own assassination Kennedy recorded, ” I feel that we must bear a good deal of responsibility, in part beginning with our cable of early August, in which we suggested the coup, period. In my judgment that wire was badly drafted, comma, it should never have been sent on a Saturday. On the other hand, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger who ought to perform this statute of the government of the United States of America, so the life of the petitioner could not be imprisoned , lost all of his properties and be miserable life by the Kissinger.

Perhaps, the Kissinger does not only understand about to Public Law 88–205, 88 congresses to be H.R. 7885. Approved December 16, 1963, in which relates to 22 U.S code § 2151 that said, “22 U.S. Code § 2151 — Congressional findings and declaration of policy. Lets the petitioner provide to this statute:

(a) United States development cooperation policy. The Congress finds that fundamental political, economic, and technological changes have resulted in the interdependence of nations. The Congress declares that the individual liberties, economic prosperity, and security of the people of the United States are best sustained and enhanced in a community of nations which respect individual civil and economic rights and freedoms and which work together to use wisely the world’s limited resources in an open and equitable international economic system. Furthermore, the Congress reaffirms the traditional humanitarian ideals of the American people and renews its commitment to assist people in developing countries to eliminate hunger, poverty, illness, and ignorance. Therefore, the Congress declares that a principal objective of the foreign policy of the United States is the encouragement and sustained support of the people of developing countries in their efforts to acquire the knowledge and resources essential to development and to build the economic, political, and social institutions which will improve the quality of their lives. United States development cooperation policy should emphasize five principal goals:

(1)

The alleviation of the worst physical manifestations of poverty among the world’s poor majority;

(2)

The promotion of conditions enabling developing countries to achieve self-sustaining economic growth with equitable distribution of benefits;

(3)

The encouragement of development processes in which individual civil and economic rights are respected and enhanced;

(4)

The integration of the developing countries into an open and equitable international economic system; and

(5)

The promotion of good governance through combating corruption and improving transparency and accountability.

The Congress declares that pursuit of these goals requires that development concerns be fully reflected in United States foreign policy and that United States development resources be effectively and efficiently utilized.

(b) Coordination of development-related activities

Under the policy guidance of the Secretary of State, the agency primarily responsible for administering subchapter I of this chapter should have the responsibility for coordinating all United States development-related activities.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424; Pub. L. 87–565, pt. I, § 101, Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 255; Pub. L. 88–205, pt. I, § 101©, Dec. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 89–171, pt. I, § 101, Sept. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 653; Pub. L. 89–583, pt. I, § 101, Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 796; Pub. L. 90–137, pt. I, § 101, Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 445; Pub. L. 93–189, § 2(2), Dec. 17, 1973, 87 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 94–161, title III, § 301, Dec. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 855; Pub. L. 95–88, title I, §§ 101, 113(b), Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 533, 538; renumbered and amended Pub. L. 95–424, title I, § 101, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 937; Pub. L. 106–309, title II, § 203(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1091.)

Significantly, if the Kissinger could enforce H.R 7885, he shall be best of an America leader which is why he has fooled a alliance backward when he changed the white to the black. Uncertainly, the erudition of the Kissinger is fooled a backward petitioner by his modern weapons when he forgot to super values of the American justice?

The petitioner is related by section 107. Chapter of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

7. The petitioner would like to provide 22 US code § 2151 that’s evidence of the Kissinger who indirectly helped for Socialist Democracy Republic of Vietnam, or so-called is of the foe of the American people and the Vietnamese people. Lets Vietnamese communist regime has tortured the petitioner because the Kissinger has torn the Paris Peace Accords in January 27, 1973 since he has signed this Paris Peace Accords. With provide to torture of the Vietnamese communist regime: The petitioner would like to provide 22 US code § 2151 that’s evidence of the Kissinger who indirectly helped for Socialist Democracy Republic of Vietnam, or so-called is of the foe of the American people and the Vietnamese people. Lets Vietnamese communist regime has tortured the petitioner because the Kissinger has torn the Paris Peace Accords in January 27, 1973 since he has signed this Paris Peace Accords. With provide to torture of the Vietnamese communist regime; in fact, after the Kissinger has ceded the South Vietnam to communism in April 30, 1975, the Vietnamese communist police have arrested the petitioner, tortured him by a gun — stock AK 47 and beaten on his left head; and therefore, the petitioner was deaf ear of the left forever. If the Kissinger did enforced all of statutes of Foreign Assistance Act of the government of the United States of America, so the life of the petitioner shall be happy, honor and successful dreams, but not lose in all. When the spirits, body, soul were injured forever by the Kissinger, he is sufferings for the long run.

8. The case of the petitioner ought to relate to S 2040 U.S. code approved by May 1, 2016; and then, “S. 2040–114th Congress: Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act.” http://www.GovTrack.us. 2015. October 8, 2016 <https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/s2040&gt;

Because of after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, a federal commission was created to fact-find as much information as possible about the planning, funding, and carrying-out of the attacks. The final report ran more than 500 pages, but much intrigue has centered around 28 pages redacted for national security purposes. “60 Minutes” ran an investigative report this month revealing that the pages likely center around how the government of Saudi Arabia — ostensibly a U.S. ally — played a significant role in funding and assisting the attacks.

A controversial bill would allow U.S. courts to hold the Saudi government responsible if it is found to have played a role in funding or assisting the attacks. The Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, S. 2040 and H.R. 3815, has become a major issue in the presidential race over the past week, pitting the Democratic president on the opposite side of the two Democratic candidates, and potentially causing major divides in the U.S.-Saudi partnership.

In the opinion of petitioner would like to point out of this S. 2040: Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. If Mr. Kissinger shall not cede Republic of Vietnam to communism, Mr. Kissinger did not only have great merit with the United States Statute and Constitution but also become to perfect partnerships of the Vietnamese people and Republic of Vietnam. On the other hand, Mr. Kissinger is indirectly to be sponsor to communist terrorism because the Vietnam War has been terrorized for one century of the Vietnamese people by the Intentional communism, but Mr. Kissinger has destroyed the statutes of the United States of America and the Paris Peace Accords for the Vietnam War of Foreign Assistance Acts of the United States of America. Therefore, the all of the life of petitioner were broken up and lost completely by Mr. Kissinger.

9. To base on 1961, 75 Stat. 424, as amended, known as the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

CODIFICATION

Another section 129 of Pub. L. 87–195 was renumbered section 130 and is classified to section 2152 of this title.

AMENDMENTS

2000 — Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 106–309 added par. (3).

§2152. Assistance for victims of torture

(a) In general The President is authorized to provide assistance for the rehabilitation of victims of torture. (b) Eligibility for grants Such assistance shall be provided in the form of grants to treatment centers and programs in foreign countries that are carrying out projects or activities specifically designed to treat victims of torture for the physical and psychological effects of the torture. © Use of funds Such assistance shall be available — (1) for direct services to victims of torture; and (2) to provide research and training to health care providers outside of treatment centers or programs described in subsection (b) of this section, for the purpose of enabling such providers to provide the services described in paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §130, formerly §129, as added Pub. L. 105–320, §4(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 3017; renumbered §130, Pub. L. 106–87, §6(a),

10. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 22 U.S code §2451:

22 U.S. Code § 2451 — Congressional statement of purpose:

The purpose of this chapter is to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries by means of educational and cultural exchange; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations, and the contributions being made toward a peaceful and more fruitful life for people throughout the world; to promote international cooperation for educational and cultural advancement; and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.

(Pub. L. 87–256, § 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 527.)

_________________________________________________________

According to this is 22 U.S. Code § 2451 to perfectly if the Kissinger could not distort this act, so the life of this petition could not have sufferings, injury and prisoner, the petitioner would like to offer its quotes’ to secretary of state Kissinger to understand about the petitioner because his life was fooled by the Kissinger, said he distort justice is national traitor. Because the Kissinger has distorted the statutes of the government of the United States of America, he has forgotten to the rules of laws of the United States of America.

11. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 42 U.S code § 200a:

42 U.S. Code § 2000a — Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation:

(d) Support by State action

Discrimination or segregation by an establishment is supported by State action within the meaning of this subchapter if such discrimination or segregation (1) is carried on under color of any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; or (2) is carried on under color of any custom or usage required or enforced by officials of the State or political subdivision thereof; or (3) is required by action of the State or political subdivision thereof.

According to this 42 U.S. Code § 2000a, in which the petitioner was discriminated by the Kissinger and his boss, because they have used body of the petitioner for the purpose inhuman. During they are great civilization, yet the petitioner is a backward person. Uncertainly, a backward person was had big crime with a great modern county of Mr. Kissinger when Mr. Kissinger is luxuriously living in the United States of America. Yet, the petitioner is making modern slavery for Mr. Kissinger without have any benefits in the rights. Because they were used the Southern officer of Republic of Vietnam for inhuman, they have thought petitioner with who was symbolized Chinese Pandas. And since, they have exchanged petitioner to Chinese pandas. When the Kissinger and President Nixon have ceded the South Vietnam to Chinese communists, the Nixon could have a Chinese Pandas in order to offer to the Nixon’s wife.

In prove to Nixon tape’s recording for the South Vietnam and the wife of Nixon:

President Nixon: Let’s be perfectly cold-blooded about it. If you look at it from the standpoint of our game with the Soviets and the Chinese, from the standpoint of running this country, I think we could take almost anything, frankly, in my view, that we can force on [South Vietnamese president Nguyen van] Thieu. Almost anything; I just come down to that. You know what I mean?

Because I have a feeling that we would not be doing, like I feel about the Israelis, I feel that in the long run we’re probably not doing them an in — a disfavor due to the fact that I feel the North Vietnamese are so badly hurt that the South Vietnamese are probably going to do fairly well.

Also due to the fact — because I look at the tide of history out there, South Vietnam is probably never going to survive anyway. I’m just being perfectly candid. I —

Henry Kissinger: In the pullout area —

President Nixon: There’s got to be — if we can get certain guarantees so that they aren’t . . . as you know, looking at the foreign policy process, though, I mean, you’ve got to be — we also have to realize, Henry, that winning an election is terribly important. It’s terribly important this year.

But can we have a viable foreign policy if a year from now or two years from now, North Vietnam gobbles up South Vietnam? That’s the real question.

Kissinger: If a year from now or two years from now North Vietnam gobbles up South Vietnam, we can have a viable foreign policy — if it looks like as if a result of South Vietnamese incompetence. If we now sell out in such a way that, say that in a three- to four-month period, we have pushed President Thieu over the brink, we ourselves — I think there is going to be — even the Chinese won’t like that. I mean, they’ll pay verbal — verbally, they’ll like it —

President Nixon: But it will worry them.

Kissinger: But it will worry everybody. And domestically, in the long run it won’t help us all that much, because our opponents will say we should have done it three years ago.

President Nixon: I know.

Kissinger: So we’ve got to find some formula that holds the thing together a year or two, after which — after a year, Mr. President, Vietnam will be a backwater. If we settle it, say, this October, by January ’74 no one will give a damn…

President Nixon: hello.

Mrs. Nixon: Yeah, hi there,

President Nixon: I wanted to be sure you knew that we called Connie’s officer; and I told her that, and we announced that we announced today that the pandas would go to the Washington —

Mrs. Nixon: Yeah, I got the word.

12. The petitioner ought to carry on 42 U.S.C. § 1981: US Code — Section 1981: Equal rights under the law that’s clear aim in order to request compensation for recapturing of the losing properties and benefits of prisoner of war of the Vietnam War.

To provide 42 U.S.C. § 1981: US Code — Section 1981: Equal Rights under the law:

(a) Statement of equal rights All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other. (b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship. © Protection against impairment the rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law. — See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/42/21/I/1981#sthash.pRDjWyO5.dpuf

_____________________________________

Therefore, the petitioner would like to express the best of An American citizen with whom only does obey the United States Statutes and Constitution, so the petition quote’s ” The great hope of America society is individual character.
 Therefore, my life is not to be a brick, which lies under dirty mud.
 Instead, I see my life as a brick, which supports the building of the
 American democracy
.”

Because the Kissing did not enforce contracts with his former Republic of Vietnam, the Kissinger did not enforce contracts the Paris Peace Accords, H.R 7885 and all of foreign Assistances of the government of the United States of America has solemnly pledged with the South Vietnam as like a contract of December 23, 1950. Therefore, the petitioner would like to take this42 U.S.C. § 1981 in order to struggle for the American justice which is why former President Bush’s son has said, “The South Vietnam did not fight for their freedom which is why they did not have it today.” If the petitioner would not fight for Equal rights under the law, the life of petitioner shall become a brick, which is buried under deep mud. it will not see in the mansion of the American democracy.

For example, Mutual Defense Assistance in Indochina: Agreement Between the United States of America and Cambodia, France, Laos, and Viet-Nam, Amending Annex to Agreement of December 23, 1950, Effected by Exchanges of Notes Between the United States of America and France, Dated at Saigon August 10 and September 8, 1951; Between the United States of America and Viet-name, Dated at Saigon August 10 and September 17, 1951; Between the United States of America and Laos, Dated at Saigon August 16, 1951, and at Vientiane November 6, 1951; Between the United States of America and Cambodia, Dated at Saigon August 16, 1951, and at Phnom-Penh January 7, 1952, Entrant enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.

© Protection against impairment

The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.

(R.S. § 1977; Pub. L. 102–166, title I, § 101, Nov. 21, 1991, 105 Stat. 1071.)

According to this statute that petitioner is encouraged petition to the American court in order to recapture his benefits were lost all of properties by the Kissinger who has played a war game of the Vietnam War and therefore, the petitioner did not only lose in all of super values of his life but also his family has been endured sufferings, unhappiness and prisoner by the lack of human rights of the Kissinger.

His properties, frame and land were nationalized by his Vietnamese communist foe when the Kissinger did not enforce the Paris Peace Accords, but he has ceded the petitioner to communism.

No parents of the world were born their children let them service for the war, but no have any benefits when they were lost honor, dignity and property by their alliance of the government of the United States of America. In prove to this statute:

(a) Statement of equal rights

All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.

(b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined

For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.

© Protection against impairment

The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by non governmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.

(R.S. § 1977; Pub. L. 102–166, title I, § 101, Nov. 21, 1991, 105 Stat. 1071.)

13. 28 U.S. Code § 533 — Investigative and other officials; appointment:

To follow with 4 of this statute that’s secretary of state Kissinger seemed anti — the United States Statutes. In fact, (4) to conduct such other investigations regarding official matters under the control of the Department of Justice and the Department of State as may be directed by the Attorney General.

This section does not limit the authority of departments and agencies to investigate crimes against the United States when investigative jurisdiction has been assigned by law to such departments and agencies.

Because of the Kissinger has distorted the United States Statutes, the Kissinger did not carry on Public Law 7885 that was for the Vietnam War. The statute’s Public Law 88- 205 so-called is H.R. 7885 section 407 has said, “ No department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction of any educational institution. Approved December 16, 1963 that was been confirmed by the United States Congress, “it is the sense of the congress that assistance authorized by this act should be extended to or withheld from government of South Vietnam, in the discretion of the President, to further the objectives of victory in the war again communism and return to their homeland of Americans involved in that struggle.”

Because of the Kissinger has did other way of this Public law’s H.R. 7885, he did not only betray to the petitioner but also have not pledge the oath loyalty in himself, since the Kissinger was official appointment for secretary state of the government of the United States of America.

14. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 18 U.S. Code § 2381 — Treason:

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016 (2) (J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Because of the Kissinger did not only betray to the petitioner but also have treason, he did not perform any statutes of the United States of America in the Vietnam War. In the meanwhile, the Kissinger has ceded the South Vietnam to communism when the rules of law of the United States of America have been persuaded for the South Vietnam fighting to anti — communism. Therefore, the petitioner was imprisoning for an half and six years, all of properties were nationalized and his wife and seven children were suffered miserable by Socialist Republic of Vietnam when the Kissinger has ceded the South Vietnam to communism by Paris Peace Accords.

erred Into Force January 7, 1952, Operative Retroactively July 1, 1951.

  1. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s statute is 26 U.S. Code § 112 — Certain combat zone compensation of members of the Armed Forces that’s according to this act, the petitioner has based on to this part of 26 U.S Code 112 that:

(3) Period of conflict

For purposes of this subsection, the Vietnam conflict began February 28, 1961, and ends on the date designated by the President by Executive order as the date of the termination of combatant activities in Vietnam. For purposes of this subsection, an individual is in a missing status as a result of the Vietnam conflict if immediately before such status began he was performing service in Vietnam or was performing service in Southeast Asia in direct support of military operations in Vietnam.

Because the Kissinger has betrayed the Paris Peace Accords, he has used this treaty in order to bring the United States citizens to their homeland when he has left the partnership of the government of the United States of America on the battlefield of the Vietnam War. The most importance of Paris Peace Accords shall not be left any allied troops of the United States of America to his Vietnamese communist foe. But the Kissinger has transferred the petitioners to Socialist Republic of Vietnam without regrets, the Kissinger was indirectly borrowed the hands of the Vietnamese communists for imprisoning him and nationalizing his house and farm. The petitioner did not only lose all of the things of his life but also endure sufferings and injuring all of his body and spirits. Barbarously, the torture of Vietnamese communist regime that has made the injured ear of the petitioner because it was tortured on his head by the butt of gun AK.47. The need of tortures of his foe got more news of Department Police system of the South Vietnam. As a result, the left ear of the petitioner was deaf by the Vietnamese communists tortured him.

Therefore, the petitioner is adequately earned and compensated all of the benefits of the Vietnam War by secretary state Kissinger ha had betrayed him. Because the government of the United States of America has been enacted for many laws to operate in the South Vietnam, no laws could betray the South Vietnam.

When the petitioner did not have any crime to the United States of America, the petitioner was living for an half of earth circling earth. So what did the petitioner have crime and terror with the American people and the government of the United States?

Significantly, the life of petitioner looks like Native Americans because he has felt sadly, happily and interestingly. He has been doing for the same as the American people as like writing books, sculpting, and painting without terrorist or robbery to the United States of America for what have the Kissinger had destroyed to his wonderful life without regrets? His dreams were lost by the Kissinger.

16. The petitioner would like to base on statute’s 5 U.S. Code § 5561 or Public Law 114–38:

According to these statutes that the petitioner does not only earn adequately benefits of the Vietnam War from the government of the United States of America but also have supporting for his seven children and his wife. They should enough recapture benefits of prisoner of war because the petitioner has been serviced for core of interests for the government of the United States of America by Public Law 7885 approved December 16, 1963. For the South government of Republic of Vietnam did not only rule by the government of the United States of America but also have the Southern people too. The time of the petitioner, his seven children, his wife were living in the tremendous concentration camps and overseeing for the eighteen years in Vietnam by the foe of the government of the United States of America and him. In fact, from April 30, 1975 to November 22, 1993 because the socialist Republic of Vietnam is the same as one tremendous concentration camp. During Mr. Kissinger, the Kissinger’s wife, and Kissinger’s children were freely going to many American universities in order to study lest them invest for civilization and high technology; Yet, the wife and the children of the petitioner have no food, no school, and properties lost — no freedom, no justice, and no democracy.

As a result, no statutes of the United States of America shall be ceded the South government of Republic of Vietnam to communism and no treaty of the government of the United States of America shall be taken all of properties of the Southern soldiers to transfer to communism and no rules of law of the government of the United States of America shall be allowed the foe’s Socialist Republic of Vietnam imprisoned the police of Republic of Vietnam, during the Paris Peace Accords has had not exchange any United States Citizens returning to their homeland, so the petitioner ought to imprison lets the American troops go returning to their homeland.

  1. the petitioner would like to base on this statute’s 8 U.S. Code § 1157 — Annual admission of refugees and admission of emergency situation refugees, or so-called is 114 STAT. 2196

PUBLIC LAW 106–484 — NOV. 9, 2000

such individual is officially absent from such individual’s

post of duty without authority.

To provide to 8 U.S. Code § 1157. Annual admission of refugees and admission of emergency situation refugees

Current through Pub. L. 114–93 except 92

See Public Laws for the current Congress

(a) Maximum number of admissions; increases for humanitarian concerns; allocations

(1) Except as provided in subsection (b), the number of refugees who may be admitted under this section in fiscal year 1980, 1981, or 1982, may not exceed fifty thousand unless the President determines, before the beginning of the fiscal year and after appropriate consultation (as defined in subsection (e)), that admission of a specific number of refugees in excess of such number is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.

(2) Except as provided in subsection (b), the number of refugees who may be admitted under this section in any fiscal year after fiscal year 1982 shall be such number as the President determines, before the beginning of the fiscal year and after appropriate consultation, is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.

(3) Admissions under this subsection shall be allocated among refugees of special humanitarian concern to the United States in accordance with a determination made by the President after appropriate consultation.

(4) In the determination made under this subsection for each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1992), the President shall enumerate, with the respective number of refugees so determined, the number of aliens who were granted asylum in the previous year.

(b) Determinations by President respecting number of admissions for humanitarian concerns If the President determines, after appropriate consultation, that (1) an unforeseen emergency refugee situation exists, (2) the admission of certain refugees in response to the emergency refugee situation is justified by grave humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest, and (3) the admission to the United States of these refugees cannot be accomplished under subsection (a), the President may fix a number of refugees to be admitted to the United States during the succeeding period (not to exceed twelve months) in response to the emergency refugee situation and such admissions shall be allocated among refugees of special humanitarian concern to the United States in accordance with a determination made by the President after the appropriate consultation provided under this subsection.

© Admission by Attorney General of refugees; criteria; admission status of spouse or child; applicability of other statutory requirements; termination of refugee status of alien, spouse or child

(1) Subject to the numerical limitations established pursuant to subsections (a) and (b), the Attorney General may, in the Attorney General’s discretion and pursuant to such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe, admit any refugee who is not firmly resettled in any foreign country, is determined to be of special humanitarian concern to the United States, and is admissible (except as otherwise provided under paragraph (3)) as an immigrant under this chapter.

(2)

(A) A spouse or child (as defined in section 1101(b)(1)(A), (B), ©, (D), or (E) of this title) of any refugee who qualifies for admission under paragraph (1) shall, if not otherwise entitled to admission under paragraph (1) and if not a person described in the second sentence of section 1101(a)(42) of this title, be entitled to the same admission status as such refugee if accompanying, or following to join, such refugee and if the spouse or child is admissible (except as otherwise provided under paragraph (3)) as an immigrant under this chapter. Upon the spouse’s or child’s admission to the United States, such admission shall be charged against the numerical limitation established in accordance with the appropriate subsection under which the refugee’s admission is charged.

(B) An unmarried alien who seeks to accompany, or follow to join, a parent granted admission as a refugee under this subsection, and who was under 21 years of age on the date on which such parent applied for refugee status under this section, shall continue to be classified as a child for purposes of this paragraph, if the alien attained 21 years of age after such application was filed but while it was pending.

(3) The provisions of paragraphs (4), (5), and (7)(A) of section 1182(a) of this title shall not be applicable to any alien seeking admission to the United States under this subsection, and the Attorney General may waive any other provision of such section (other than paragraph (2)© or subparagraph (A), (B), ©, or (E) of paragraph (3)) with respect to such an alien for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest. Any such waiver by the Attorney General shall be in writing and shall be granted only on an individual basis following an investigation. The Attorney General shall provide for the annual reporting to Congress of the number of waivers granted under this paragraph in the previous fiscal year and a summary of the reasons for granting such waivers.

(4) The refugee status of any alien (and of the spouse or child of the alien) may be terminated by the Attorney General pursuant to such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe if the Attorney General determines that the alien was not in fact a refugee within the meaning of section 1101(a)(42) of this title at the time of the alien’s admission.

(d) Oversight reporting and consultation requirements

(1) Before the start of each fiscal year the President shall report to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate regarding the foreseeable number of refugees who will be in need of resettlement during the fiscal year and the anticipated allocation of refugee admissions during the fiscal year. The President shall provide for periodic discussions between designated representatives of the President and members of such committees regarding changes in the worldwide refugee situation, the progress of refugee admissions, and the possible need for adjustments in the allocation of admissions among refugees.

(2) As soon as possible after representatives of the President initiate appropriate consultation with respect to the number of refugee admissions under subsection (a) or with respect to the admission of refugees in response to an emergency refugee situation under subsection (b), the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall cause to have printed in the Congressional Record the substance of such consultation.

(3)

(A) After the President initiates appropriate consultation prior to making a determination under subsection (a), a hearing to review the proposed determination shall be held unless public disclosure of the details of the proposal would jeopardize the lives or safety of individuals.

(B) After the President initiates appropriate consultation prior to making a determination, under subsection (b), that the number of refugee admissions should be increased because of an unforeseen emergency refugee situation, to the extent that time and the nature of the emergency refugee situation permit, a hearing to review the proposal to increase refugee admissions shall be held unless public disclosure of the details of the proposal would jeopardize the lives or safety of individuals.

(e) “Appropriate consultation” defined For purposes of this section, the term “appropriate consultation” means, with respect to the admission of refugees and allocation of refugee admissions, discussions in person by designated Cabinet-level representatives of the President with members of the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and of the House of Representatives to review the refugee situation or emergency refugee situation, to project the extent of possible participation of the United States therein, to discuss the reasons for believing that the proposed admission of refugees is justified by humanitarian concerns or grave humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest, and to provide such members with the following information:

(1) A description of the nature of the refugee situation.

(2) A description of the number and allocation of the refugees to be admitted and an analysis of conditions within the countries from which they came.

(3) A description of the proposed plans for their movement and resettlement and the estimated cost of their movement and resettlement.

(4) An analysis of the anticipated social, economic, and demographic impact of their admission to the United States.

(5) A description of the extent to which other countries will admit and assist in the resettlement of such refugees.

(6) An analysis of the impact of the participation of the United States in the resettlement of such refugees on the foreign policy interests of the United States.

(7) Such additional information as may be appropriate or requested by such members.

To the extent possible, information described in this subsection shall be provided at least two weeks in advance of discussions in person by designated representatives of the President with such members.

(f) Training

(1) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall provide all United States officials adjudicating refugee cases under this section with the same training as that provided to officers adjudicating asylum cases under section 1158 of this title.

(2) Such training shall include country-specific conditions, instruction on the internationally recognized right to freedom of religion, instruction on methods of religious persecution practiced in foreign countries, and applicable distinctions within a country between the nature of and treatment of various religious practices and believers.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 1, § 207, as added Pub. L. 96–212, title II, § 201(b), Mar. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 103; amended Pub. L. 100–525, § 9(h), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2620; Pub. L. 101–649, title I, § 104(b), title VI, § 603(a)(4), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4985, 5082; Pub. L. 102–232, title III, § 307(l)(1), Dec. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 1756; Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title VI, § 601(b), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–689; Pub. L. 105–292, title VI, § 602(a), Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2812; Pub. L. 107–208, § 5, Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 109–13, div. B, title I, § 101(g)(2), May 11, 2005, 119 Stat. 305.)

Bring Them Home Alive Program

Pub. L. 106–484, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2195, provided that:

“SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

“This Act may be cited as the ‘Bring Them Home Alive Act of 2000’.

“SEC. 2. AMERICAN VIETNAM WAR POW/MIA ASYLUM PROGRAM.

“(a) Asylum for Eligible Aliens. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Attorney General shall grant refugee status in the United States to any alien described in subsection (b), upon the application of that alien.

“(b) Eligibility. — Refugee status shall be granted under subsection (a) to —

“(1) any alien who —

“(A) is a national of Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, China, or any of the independent states of the former Soviet Union; and

“(B) personally delivers into the custody of the United States Government a living American Vietnam War POW/MIA; and

“(2) any parent, spouse, or child of an alien described in paragraph (1).

“© Definitions. — In this section:

“(1) American vietnam war pow/mia. —

“(A) In general. — Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term ‘American Vietnam War POW/MIA’ means an individual —

“(i) who is a member of a uniformed service (within the meaning of section 101(3) of title 37, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 551(2) of such title and this subsection) as a result of the Vietnam War; or

“(ii) who is an employee (as defined in section 5561(2) of title 5, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 5561(5) of such title) as a result of the Vietnam War.

“(B) Exclusion. — Such term does not include an individual with respect to whom it is officially determined under section 552© of title 37, United States Code, that such individual is officially absent from such individual’s post of duty without authority.

“(2) Missing status. — The term ‘missing status’, with respect to the Vietnam War, means the status of an individual as a result of the Vietnam War if immediately before that status began the individual —

“(A) was performing service in Vietnam; or

“(B) was performing service in Southeast Asia in direct support of military operations in Vietnam.

“(3) Vietnam war. — The term ‘Vietnam War’ means the conflict in Southeast Asia during the period that began on February 28, 1961, and ended on May 7, 1975.

“SEC. 3. AMERICAN KOREAN WAR POW/MIA ASYLUM PROGRAM.

“(a) Asylum for Eligible Aliens. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Attorney General shall grant refugee status in the United States to any alien described in subsection (b), upon the application of that alien.

“(b) Eligibility. — Refugee status shall be granted under subsection (a) to —

“(1) any alien —

“(A) who is a national of North Korea, China, or any of the independent states of the former Soviet Union; and

“(B) who personally delivers into the custody of the United States Government a living American Korean War POW/MIA; and

“(2) any parent, spouse, or child of an alien described in paragraph (1).

“© Definitions. — In this section:

“(1) American korean war pow/mia. —

“(A) In general. — Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term ‘American Korean War POW/MIA’ means an individual —

“(i) who is a member of a uniformed service (within the meaning of section 101(3) of title 37, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 551(2) of such title and this subsection) as a result of the Korean War; or

“(ii) who is an employee (as defined in section 5561(2) of title 5, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 5561(5) of such title) as a result of the Korean War.

“(B) Exclusion. — Such term does not include an individual with respect to whom it is officially determined under section 552© of title 37, United States Code, that such individual is officially absent from such individual’s post of duty without authority.

“(2) Korean war. — The term ‘Korean War’ means the conflict on the Korean peninsula during the period that began on June 27, 1950, and ended January 31, 1955.

“(3) Missing status. — The term ‘missing status’, with respect to the Korean War, means the status of an individual as a result of the Korean War if immediately before that status began the individual —

“(A) was performing service in the Korean peninsula; or

“(B) was performing service in Asia in direct support of military operations in the Korean peninsula.

“SEC. 4. BROADCASTING INFORMATION ON THE ‘BRING THEM HOME ALIVE’ PROGRAM.

“(a) Requirement. —

“(1) In general. — The International Broadcasting Bureau shall broadcast, through WORLDNET Television and Film Service and Radio, VOA–TV, VOA Radio, or otherwise, information that promotes the ‘Bring Them Home Alive’ refugee program under this Act to foreign countries covered by paragraph (2).

“(2) Covered countries. — The foreign countries covered by paragraph (1) are —

“(A) Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, China, and North Korea; and

“(B) Russia and the other independent states of the former Soviet Union.

“(b) Level of Programming. — The International Broadcasting Bureau shall broadcast —

“(1) at least 20 hours of the programming described in subsection (a)(1) during the 30-day period that begins 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 9, 2000]; and

“(2) at least 10 hours of the programming described in subsection (a)(1) in each calendar quarter during the period beginning with the first calendar quarter that begins after the date of enactment of this Act and ending five years after the date of enactment of this Act.

“© Availability of Information on the Internet. — The International Broadcasting Bureau shall ensure that information regarding the ‘Bring Them Home Alive’ refugee program under this Act is readily available on the World Wide Web sites of the Bureau.

“(d) Sense of Congress. — It is the sense of Congress that RFE/RL, Incorporated, Radio Free Asia, and any other recipient of Federal grants that engages in international broadcasting to the countries covered by subsection (a)(2) should broadcast information similar to the information required to be broadcast by subsection (a)(1).

“(e) Definition. — The term ‘International Broadcasting Bureau’ means the International Broadcasting Bureau of the United States Information Agency or, on and after the effective date of title XIII of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (as contained in division G of Public Law 105–277) [see Effective Date note set out under section 6531 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse], the International Broadcasting Bureau of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

“SEC. 5. INDEPENDENT STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION DEFINED.

“In this Act, the term ‘independent states of the former Soviet Union’ has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the FREEDOM Support Act (22 U.S.C. 5801).”

Gender-Related Persecution Task Force

Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(7) [div. A, title II, §254], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–432, provided that:

“(a) Establishment of Task Force. — The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and other appropriate Federal agencies, shall establish a task force with the goal of determining eligibility guidelines for women seeking refugee status overseas due to gender-related persecution.

“(b) Report. — Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1999], the Secretary of State shall prepare and submit to the Congress a report outlining the guidelines determined by the task force under subsection (a).”

Establishing Categories of Aliens for Purposes of Refugee Determinations

Pub. L. 101–167, title V, §599D, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1261, as amended by Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §598(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2063; Pub. L. 102–391, title V, §582(a)(1), (b)(1), ©, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1686; Pub. L. 102–511, title IX, §905(a), (b)(1), ©, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3356; Pub. L. 103–236, title V, §512(1), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 466; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101© [title V, §575(1)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–168; Pub. L. 104–319, title I, §101(1), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3865; Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §574(1), Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2432; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VII, §705(1)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–389; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(4) [title II, §214(1)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–240; Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title II, §212(1)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–27, provided that:

To relate for Pub. L. 106–484 Bring Them Home Alive Act of 2000

106 th Congress
 November 9, 2000
 114 Stat. 2195
 ______________ 
 [S.484]
 One Hundred Sixth Congress of the United States of America
 AT THE SECOND SESSION
 Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 
 the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand 
 An Act
 To provide for the granting of refugee status in the United States to nationals of certain foreign countries in which American Vietnam War POW/MIAs or American Korean War POW/MIAs may be present, if those nationals assist in the return to the United States of those POW/MIAs alive.
 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled ,
 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Bring Them Home Alive Act of 2000”.
 SEC. 2. AMERICAN VIETNAM WAR POW/MIA ASYLUM PROGRAM.

(a) ASYLUM FOR ELIGIBLE ALIENS- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Attorney General shall grant refugee status in the United States to any alien described in subsection (b), upon the application of that alien.
 (b) ELIGIBILITY- Refugee status shall be granted under subsection (a) to-
 (1) any alien who-
 (A) is a national of Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, China, or any of the independent states of the former Soviet Union; and
 (B) personally delivers into the custody of the United States Government a living American Vietnam War POW/MIA; and
 (2) any parent, spouse, or child of an alien described in paragraph (1).
 © DEFINITIONS- In this section:
 (1) AMERICAN VIETNAM WAR POW/MIA-
 (A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term “American Vietnam War
 POW/MIA” means an individual-
 (i) who is a member of a uniformed service (within the meaning of section 101(3) of title 37,United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 551(2) of such title and this subsection) as a result of the Vietnam War; or
 (ii) who is an employee (as defined in section 5561(2) of title 5, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 5561(5) of such title) as a result of the Vietnam War.
 (B) EXCLUSION- Such term does not include an individual with respect to whom it is officially determined under section 552© of title 37, United States Code, that such individual is officially absent from such individual’s post of duty without authority.
 (2) MISSING STATUS- The term “missing status”, with respect to the Vietnam War, means the status of an individual as a result of the Vietnam War if immediately before that status began the individual–
 (A) was performing service in Vietnam; or
 (B) was performing service in Southeast Asia in direct support of military operations in Vietnam.
 (3) VIETNAM WAR- The term “Vietnam War” means the conflict in Southeast Asia during the period that began on February 28, 1961, and ended on May 7, 1975.
 SEC. 3. AMERICAN KOREAN WAR POW/MIA ASYLUM PROGRAM.

(a) ASYLUM FOR ELIGIBLE ALIENS- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Attorney General shall grant refugee status in the United States to any alien described in subsection (b), upon the application of that alien.
 (b) ELIGIBILITY- Refugee status shall be granted under subsection (a) to–
 (1) any alien–
 (A) who is a national of North Korea, China, or any of the independent states of the former Soviet Union; and
 (B) who personally delivers into the custody of the United States Government a living American
 Korean War POW/MIA; and
 (2) any parent, spouse, or child of an alien described in paragraph (1).
 © DEFINITIONS- In this section:
 (1) AMERICAN KOREAN WAR POW/MIA-
 (A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term “American Korean War POW/MIA” means an individual–
 (i) who is a member of a uniformed service (within the meaning of section 101(3) of title 37, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 551(2) of such title and this subsection) as a result of the Korean War; or
 (ii) who is an employee (as defined in section 5561(2) of title 5, United States Code) in a missing status (as defined in section 5561(5) of such title) as a result of the Korean War.
 (B) EXCLUSION- Such term does not include an individual with respect to whom it is officially determined under section 552© of title 37, United States Code, that such individual is officially absent from such individual’s post of duty without authority.
 (2) KOREAN WAR- The term “Korean War” means the conflict on the Korean peninsula during the period that began on June 27, 1950, and ended January 31, 1955.
 (3) MISSING STATUS- The term “missing status”, with respect to the Korean War, means the status of an individual as a result of the Korean War if immediately before that status began the individual–
 (A) was performing service in the Korean peninsula; or
 (B) was performing service in Asia in direct support of military operations in the Korean peninsula.
 SEC. 4. BROADCASTING INFORMATION ON THE “BRING THEM HOME ALIVE” PROGRAM.

(a) REQUIREMENT-
 (1) IN GENERAL- The International Broadcasting Bureau shall broadcast, through WORLDNET Television
 and Film Service and Radio, VOA-TV, VOA Radio, or otherwise, information that promotes the “Bring
 Them Home Alive” refugee program under this Act to foreign countries covered by paragraph (2).
 (2) COVERED COUNTRIES- The foreign countries covered by paragraph (1) are–
 (A) Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, China, and North Korea; and
 (B) Russia and the other independent states of the former Soviet Union.
 (b) LEVEL OF PROGRAMMING- The International Broadcasting Bureau shall broadcast–
 (1) at least 20 hours of the programming described in subsection (a)(1) during the 30-day period that begins 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act; and
 (2) at least 10 hours of the programming described in subsection (a)(1) in each calendar quarter during the period beginning with the first calendar quarter that begins after the date of enactment of this Act and ending five years after the date of enactment of this Act.
 © AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET- The International Broadcasting Bureau shall ensure that information regarding the “Bring Them Home Alive” refugee program under this Act is readily available on the World Wide Web sites of the Bureau.
 (d) SENSE OF CONGRESS- It is the sense of Congress that RFE/RL, Incorporated, Radio Free Asia, and any other recipient of Federal grants that engages in international broadcasting to the countries covered by subsection (a)(2) should broadcast information similar to the information required to be broadcast by subsection (a)(1).
 (e) DEFINITION- The term “International Broadcasting Bureau” means the International Broadcasting Bureau of the United States Information Agency or, on and after the effective date of title XIII of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (as contained in division G of Public Law 105–277), the International Broadcasting Bureau of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
 SEC. 5. INDEPENDENT STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION DEFINED.

In this Act, the term “independent states of the former Soviet Union” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the FREEDOM Support Act (22 U.S.C. 5801).

Because no the emperors of the world with whom those have enacted the rules of law to help for backward countries of the World, and then those have sold off this backward country and left its soldiers on the battlefield, and the farm and the land of its alliance to its foe and them, the super emperor transferred to slave trade as like the Kissinger has did this petitioner. After that, the twenty years have gone by, the Kissinger is inhuman when former secretary of state’s government of the United States of America, Henry Kissinger acknowledged “mistakes were made” by America in Vietnam War, but said he had no regrets about his actions after he declared and said, ” Vietnam failures we did to ourselves.” The petitioner would like to question the Kissinger that where is the super values of the America justice playing? When he decided prisoners of war to be refugee, the Kissinger did not only enforce 75 U.N.T.S 135 but also the government of the United States of America was approved this International convention.

To follow with Federal Register of SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority Under Sections 552©(2) and 614 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State:

(1) the authority under section 552©(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), to direct the drawdown of up to $15 million in nonlethal commodities and services from any department or agency of the United States to provide assistance for the Syrian Opposition Coalition (SOC) and the Supreme Military Council (SMC), and to make the determinations required under such section to direct such a drawdown; and

(2) the authority under section 614 of the FAA to determine whether it is important to the security interests of the United States to furnish such assistance to the SOC and the SMC without regard to any other provision of law within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

The petitioner would like to question the Kissinger, what did the Kissinger think about to the Public Law 88–205, 88th Congress, H.R. 7885, December 16, 1963? This was not the statute of the United States of America?

  1. The Petitioner would like to base on U.S. Code: Title 38 — VETERANS’ BENEFITS

Because this petitioner is adequately earned veterans benefits, he did not only service to core of interests of the United States of America but also have the best of American citizen; and how did the Kissinger have abused to his backward life of him in order to play war game? Therefore based on these statutes of the United States of America, so this petitioner is enough recapture to veterans benefits. Because no human person of the whole world shall be young man with who has been serviced for core of interests of the United States of America when he is old and injury without benefits?

Therefore, the petitioner shall be adequately earning not only Imprisoned benefits insurance but also should recapture all of veterans benefits again because the petitioner was serviced for a core of interests of the United States of America, he has taken an oath loyalty the United States since he became a Vietnamese American citizen.

  1. The petitioner would like to provide evidences of the United States Statute is 28 US code § 4101 because the Kissinger did not only destroy to the wonderful life of the petitioner but also have Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jack Chahal together devastate to his life when he is the best of an American citizen without violated crime of the traffic laws in state of California. They have destroyed his life when they have defamed, libeled and slandered him.

According to the Kissinger has defamed, libeled, and slandered him because the Kissinger has thought about the petitioner who is backward when the petitioner lived in a backward Vietnam land. Thus the Kissinger is living in the modern nation and Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jackie Chahal are too.

During, the petitioner did not have any violated crime with his former nation and the Vietnamese people — and the American people and the United States of America, but the Kissinger has defamed, libeled, and slandered him. Lets Kissinger borrow the hand of the Vietnamese communist arrested him and sent him too many jails in the Vietnam after April 30, 1975. Yet Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jackie Chahal were defamed, libeled, and slandered — discriminated him by the people races since the petitioner was not born in the United States of America or so-called is Native American. Also they have discriminated him because the petitioner who did not perfectly educate in the United States of America.

Because they have used three codes of California Vehicle Code Section 13953, 14103 and 14105 that did not persuade to his case, but they did discriminated him in order to destroy his life because the California Vehicle Code Section’s saying:

  1. §13953 is In the alternative to the procedure under Sections 13950, 13951, and 13952 and in the event the department determines upon investigation or reexamination that the safety of the person subject to investigation or reexamination or other persons upon the highways require such action, the department shall forthwith and without hearing suspend or revoke the privilege of the person to operate a motor vehicle or impose reasonable terms and conditions of probation which shall be relative to the safe No order of suspension or revocation or operation of a motor vehicle. the imposition of terms or conditions of probation shall become effective until 30 days after the giving of written notice thereof to the person affected, except that the department shall have authority to make any such order effective immediately upon the giving of notice when in its opinion because of the mental or physical condition of the person such immediate action is required for the safety of the driver or other persons upon the highways. — See more at: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/vehicle-code/veh-sect-13953.html#sthash.8CsL565J.dpuf

Thus, the petitioner did not violate crime to traffic law which is why they have used those codes in order to defame him.

  1. §14103 is saying: Failure to respond to a notice given under this chapter within 10 days is a waiver of the right to a hearing, and the department may take action without a hearing or may, upon request of the person whose privilege of driving is in question, or at its own option, reopen the question, take evidence, change, or set aside any order previously made, or grant a hearing. — See more at: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/vehicle-code/veh-sect-14103.html#sthash.Aac7Xt9i.dpuf

According to this section that the petitioner has never had failures any respond of the Department of Motor Vehicle has been requested to him. (Please review his documents below.)

  1. §14105 is saying: (a)Upon the conclusion of a hearing, the hearing officer or hearing board shall make findings and render a decision on behalf of the department and Notice of the decision shall include a shall notify the person involved. The decision shall take statement of the person’s right to a review. Neither effect as stated in the notice, but not less than four nor more than 15 days after the notice is mailed.

The decision may be modified at any time after issuance to correct mistakes or clerical errors. (b)

– See more at: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/vehicle-code/veh-sect-

14105.html#sthash.kzKlZu4u.dpuf

The petitioner would like to provide evidence that his doctor did not give him drive any within one year, so the petitioner has enforced perfectly. But when Department of Motor Vehicle has ordered him retest writing test, he has passed. And then, it has ordered him take driver testing, so he has passed it, but the Department of Motor vehicle did not give him drive any cars, he has enforced it orders. During he did not have violated any traffic laws, his health is the best because his doctors have been confirmed his health for three times and state of California — Health and Human services Agency — Department of Social Services Disability Determination Service Division — P .O. Box. 997120, Sacramento, CA 95899–7120 has been sent to Health Analysis INC, 696 San Ta Clare ST # STE 208, San Jose CA 95112. Telephone: (800)528–4655 for a mental exam, but there had not found any mental case.

On the other hand, if he were violated traffic laws, the Department of Motor Vehicle should be prosecuted him to the California Court, but not defame, not libel and not slander him because no laws of the state of California and the United States of America must defame libel and slander to him and all of the United States Citizens.

  1. The petitioner would like to base on the California Civil Code Section 43 that it clearly defined for defamation, libel and slander:
  2. Besides the personal rights mentioned or recognized in the Government Code, every person has, subject to the qualifications and restrictions provided by law, the right of protection from bodily restraint or harm, from personal insult, from defamation, and from injury to his personal relations. — See more at: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/civil-code/civ-sect-43.html#sthash.1QAKLNpw.dpuf.
  3. California Civil Code Section 45a

A libel which is defamatory of the plaintiff without the necessity of explanatory matter, such as an inducement, innuendo or other extrinsic defamatory language not fact, is said to be a libel on its face. Libelous on its face is not actionable unless the plaintiff alleges and proves that he has suffered special damage as a proximate result Special damage is defined in Section 48a of this code. — See thereof. More at: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/civil-code/civ-sect-45a.html#sthash.Sqfy2ynT.dpuf

  1. California Civil Code Section 46

Slander is a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which:

1. Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime;

2. Imputes in him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;

3. Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits;

4. Imputes to him impotence or a want of chastity; or

5. Which, by natural consequence, causes actual damage?

– See more at: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/civil-code/civ-sect-

  1. The petitioner would to provide to injured life of the petitioner because according to 17 U.S code § 107. That the petitioner is lost all of his copyrights by Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jackie Chahal. Because of they have put their label of mental case, Lack of knowledge and lack of skills render on the head of the petitioner, but he has passed by driver test- and mental condition. So his doctors and central Analysis INC for a mental exam by the state of California did not find any matters of mental case, his doctors have confirmed him good healthy. And therefore, his book’ signing and exhibiting artwork did not enforce to anywhere when he does worried about to the police and FBI that they may kill him if he takes airplane to tour for his shows. Because 17 U.S code is provided by its statement: Title 17 of the United States Code.

The petitioner has been publishing for the seventeen books, but he has copyrights for three books that are TX 6–404–116, TX 6–377–842, and TX 7–780–619.

28. The mental case of the petitioner has had relation for 18 U.S. Code § 2333 — Civil remedies because the mental case of Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jackie Chahal has put been threaten for the life of the petitioner for the long run. Specially, the petitioner has never dared organized any Book’s signing and exhibited his peices of artwork to anywhere in the United States of America and the whole world.

In fact,18 U.S. Code § 2333 — Civil remedies says:

(a)Action and Jurisdiction. —

Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefore in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees.

(b)Estoppel Under United States Law. —

A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding under section 1116, 1201, 1203, or 2332 of this title or section 46314, 46502, 46505, or 46506 of title 49 shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding under this section.

© Estoppel Under Foreign Law. —

A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of any foreign state in any criminal proceeding shall, to the extent that such judgment or decree may be accorded full faith and credit under the law of the United States, estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 102–572, title X, § 1003(a)(4), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4522; amended Pub. L. 103–429, § 2(1), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4377.)

  1. 29. The petitioner would like to provide evidence of 28 US code § 563: Oath of office;

The 28 US code § 563 says , ” The Director and each United States marshal and law enforcement officer of the Service, before taking office, shall take an oath or affirmation to faithfully execute the duties of that office. — See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/28/II/37/563#sthash.fYnrOgmF.dpuf&#8221;

Because they have taken an oath of office which is why they enforce the statutes of the United States of America what when they have distorted the super values of the American justice in themselves?

  1. The petitioner would to provide evidence of 42 US code § 2000a: US code — Section 2000a: Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation. The 42 US code § 2000a says :

(a) Equal access

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.”

31. The petitioner would like to provide evidence ofS.553 — End Modern Slavery Initiative Act of 2015:

Reported to Senate amended (02/03/2016)

End Modern Slavery Initiative Act of 2015

(Sec. 2) This bill expresses the sense of Congress that:

  • the United States has a long history of domestic and international engagement in preventing and responding to modern slavery;
  • modern slavery involves extensive criminal activity and demands U.S. attention and commitment;
  • the United States must exert all efforts to eradicate modern-day slavery domestically;
  • there is a need for international public and private cooperation to increase resources for programs to reduce the prevalence of modern slavery by building the capacity of foreign governments to deter its perpetrators; and
  • countries that fall within the first and second tiers of the Department of State’s annual Trafficking in Persons report could qualify as partner countries, and many countries on the Tier 2 watch list may also qualify and should be eligible for funding as partner countries.

(Sec. 3) The bill also declares U.S. policy to:

  • marshal resources to seek to end modern slavery through matching funds to a private grant-making institution that selects and supports innovative strategies,
  • allow such a private grant-making institution the flexibility to work in other committed countries, and
  • Through U.S. foreign assistance programs help other countries with a high prevalence of modern slavery become eligible to be partner countries for additional assistance under the End Modern Slavery Initiative established by this Act.

(Sec. 4) The bill establishes the End Modern Slavery Initiative Foundation to work with government, civil society, and private institutions in partner countries and key jurisdictions of other countries supported by the Foundation with a high prevalence of modern slavery to identify and fund successful strategies to combat modern slavery.

(Sec. 5) The Department of State may make grants to the Foundation or to another nonprofit organization meeting certain criteria that seek to receive foreign government contributions in a ratio of two-to-one and private sector contributions in a ratio of three-to-one to U.S. government funding.

The bill authorizes FY2015-FY2022 appropriations.

(Sec. 6) The U.S. government shall seek other foreign governments providing Foundation support to provide additional support, including diplomatic support, for projects in partner countries.

(Sec. 7) Foundation priorities shall be to:

  • select partner countries and key jurisdictions in other countries,
  • support programs and projects that seek to measurably reduce modern slavery in targeted populations within partner countries and key jurisdictions of other countries of at least 50% over a seven-year period,
  • prioritize programs and projects,
  • work with funded partner countries and entities to establish budgeted national plans that leverage partner country public and private funding and institutions, and
  • Establish national coordinators and leadership councils in partner countries.

(Sec. 8) The bill prescribes program monitoring and evaluation requirements.

(Sec. 9) The Government Accountability Office shall report to Congress on all of the programs conducted by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Department of Labor, the Department of Defense, and the Department of the Treasury that address human trafficking and modern slavery.

Because the petitioner would like to realize about to the United States of America that no statutes, no treaties, and no foreign Assistance Acts of the Vietnam War could put up for sale the South Vietnam to communism, transfer the Southern officers to the foe of both partnerships for imprisoning for more than twenty years. After that, the partnership of the government of the United States of America is to bring Them Home by the United States statute, yet the petitioner must be imprisoned for the long run. the petitioner after released from the concentration camps, the petitioner is come to his mother country of the America by the statute of the United States of America. So the petitioner must pay for airplane — tickets for the International organization and pay for many matters to his foe who is the Vietnamese communists, but the petitioner came to his mother country of America, he was trained for cooler job by his mother country of America. For the government of the United States of America did not consider to his sculptor job when the government of the United States of the United States of America trained him for a modern slavery.

  1. The petitioner would like to provide evidence of 8 U.S code § 336, Act Mar. 3, 1875, ch.14, §1, 18 Stat. 477.

§§331 to 339. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–461, Oct. 20, 1974, 88 Stat. 1387

Section 331, R.S. §2158, prohibited cooly trade.

Section 332, R.S. §2159; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167, related to forfeiture of vessels engaged in cooly trade.

Section 333, R.S. §2160, related to penalty for building vessels to engage in cooly trade.

Section 334, R.S. §2161, related to punishment for engaging in cooly trade.

Section 335, R.S. §2162, excepted voluntary emigration of coolies from prohibition.

Section 336, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 141, §1, 18 Stat. 477, related to inquiry and certification by consular officers.

Section 337, R.S. §2163, related to examination of vessels.

Section 338, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 141, §2, 18 Stat. 477, related to penalties for involuntary transportation of Chinese, Japanese, and others for purpose of holding to service.

Section 339, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 141, §4, 18 Stat. 477, related to punishment for contracting to supply coolly labor.

According to this statute that the petitioner would like to provide evidence, because the petitioner of the prisoner of war of the government of the United States of America, but the Kissinger did not enforce any statutes of the Foreign Assistance of the government of the United States of America in the Vietnam War, this was is belongs to the government of the United States of America as been controlled the war for more than thirty years in the Past which is why the Kissinger did not enforce it, but he has ceded the petitioner to his foe who is Vietnamese communist regime in April 30, 1975 during the Kissinger has signed the Paris Peace Accords. As a result, the petitioner has come to his mother country of America; he did not capture any benefits of prisoner of War and Imprisoned Benefit insurance when the government of the United States of America did not give him study for any mayors for the American Universities. But it has been trained him learn a cooled job with many mental cases and violated crimes in Goodwill company. But they have got the salary, but the petitioner was paid the thirty dollar per month by County of San Mateo in 1995. The petitioner has been struggled for more times in order to study because he loved his former Art Degree was earned in the South Vietnam.

During, the petitioner did not have any violated crimes to the American people and not terror the United States of America; he is only backward man when he lived in backward country. Certainly, his backward nation was crimes with the modern America.

  1. The Petitioner would like to bas on 22 U.S code § 2451

To provide statute’s saying, “The purpose of this chapter is to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries by means of educational and cultural exchange; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations, and the contributions being made toward a peaceful and more fruitful life for people throughout the world; to promote international cooperation for educational and cultural advancement; and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.

(Pub. L. 87–256, § 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 527.)”

According to this statute that is the best of super values of the American justice expressing clearly, but the Kissinger did not enforce this. He has used the low mind of the Vietnamese people lets him destroy all of the values of the Vietnamese wonderful traditions, cultures, and literatures. He is changed the values of the petitioner to modern slavery of the government of the United States of America as he has deleted a legal government of the South Vietnam but not internal of the Vietnamese people. When the Kissinger has his own nation individually, he has got the individual owner of this is petitioner to sell off to communism without base on the United States Statutes.

  1. The petitioner would like to base on 18 U.S code §§241,242 that the statutes says :
  • 241. Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

  • 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

To Provide with Mr. Kissinger, Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jackie Chahal , they have distorted the United States Statues in order to injure, oppress, and threaten to this petitioner. In fact, the Kissinger has distorted the rule of law of the United States of America in the Foreign Assistance Acts, the Kissinger did not only take all of the properties, farms, lands to sell for the Communism but also give the Vietnamese communist regime has had sent him to the jail after April 30, 1975 — during the Paris Peace Accords did not have agreed to these events. Lets the petitioner have imprisoned and lost the life. So the petitioner was prisoner of the Vietnamese people and modern slavery of the United States of America.

Significantly, the Barbara Schmidt and the Jackie Chahal have defamed, libeled, and slander him, so his treaty of artwork and literature, in which were destroyed by their. The life of the petitioner did not dare organize any art — shows and book-signing because he always worries to the police or F. B. I that they may kill him when they certainly think of him have mental case, the lack of knowledge and the skills to be robbing airplane and terrorist.

34. The petitioner would like to provide evidence’s 44 U.S. Code § 3507 — Public information collection activities; submission to Director; approval and delegation when it says: The head of each agency shall be responsible for —

(A) carrying out the agency’s information resources management activities to improve agency productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness; and

(B) complying with the requirements of this subchapter and related policies established by the Director.

(2)

(A) Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the head of each agency shall designate a Chief Information Officer who shall report directly to such agency head to carry out the responsibilities of the agency under this subchapter.

(B) The Secretary of the Department of Defense and the Secretary of each military department may each designate Chief Information Officers who shall report directly to such Secretary to carry out the responsibilities of the department under this subchapter. If more than one Chief Information Officer is designated, the respective duties of the Chief Information Officers shall be clearly delineated.

(3) The Chief Information Officer designated under paragraph (2) shall head an office responsible for ensuring agency compliance with and prompt, efficient, and effective implementation of the information policies and information resources management responsibilities established under this subchapter, including the reduction of information collection burdens on the public. The Chief Information Officer and employees of such office shall be selected with special attention to the professional qualifications required to administer the functions described under this subchapter.

(4) Each agency program official shall be responsible and accountable for information resources assigned to and supporting the programs under such official. In consultation with the Chief Information Officer designated under paragraph (2) and the agency Chief Financial Officer (or comparable official), each agency program official shall define program information needs and develop strategies, systems, and capabilities to meet those needs.

Because of the petitioner was applied for retirement, he is enough for 65 years old. But social security administration office did not give him apply for this benefit, it told not have enough for 40 quarters working pagers in the United States of America. In his opinion that’s right to follow the laws of the United States of America. However, when the petitioner would ask it and said, ” Why did not count to an half and six years of prisoner of War ? So the Social Security Administration office could not know, it followed the this law. Since the petitioner asked which is why the petitioner only serviced for core of interests of the United States of America together. After that, Social Security Administration has transferred him to SSI program.

  1. The petitioner would like to base on 5 CFR part 537 that follow 5 CFR Part 537 — REPAYMENT OF STUDENT LOANS, so the duty and responsibility of the petitioner must repay student loan because he has loaned $ 12,763.00 during he was studying at California States University for four years, the rate approximately increased to 6.75% equal to be $28,036.89 if the petitioner did not have injured more years of suspends of his driver license. He could work with the job when he did not only help for his family, body, and repay the student loan because loan should repay. However, the Kissing has got all of his properties has ceded to communism and imprisoned him without laws of the government of the United States of America, or international conventions, in which shall be nationalized all of properties of him, those borrowed the hand of communism lets send him to jail without give judgment on his case. When the Paris Peace Accords was signed by the Kissinger, the government of the United States of America has recognized the legal property and body of the petitioner within Paris Peace Accords. Why did the Kissinger protect to core of interests of the government of the United States of America when he robbed properties of the petitioner for selling off to communism?
  2. The petitioner would like to provide evidence of 22 U.S. Code § 7108 — October 28, 2000. Actions against significant traffickers in persons:

To base on the statue says, “a) Authority to sanction significant traffickers in persons

(1) In general. The President may exercise the authorities set forth in section 1702 of title 50 without regard to section 1701 of title 50 in the case of any of the following persons:

(A)

Any foreign person that plays a significant role in a severe form of trafficking in persons, directly or indirectly in the United States.

(B)

Foreign persons that materially assist in, or provide financial or technological support for or to, or provide goods or services in support of, activities of a significant foreign trafficker in persons identified pursuant to subparagraph (A).

©

Foreign persons that are owned, controlled, or directed by, or acting for or on behalf of, a significant foreign trafficker identified pursuant to subparagraph (A).

(2) Penalties

The penalties set forth in section 1705 of title 50 apply to violations of any license, order, or regulation issued under this section.

(b) Report to Congress on identification and sanctioning of significant traffickers in persons

(1) In general upon exercising the authority of subsection (a), the President shall report to the appropriate congressional committees —

(A)

Identifying publicly the foreign persons that the President determines are appropriate for sanctions pursuant to this section and the basis for such determination; and

(B)

Detailing publicly the sanctions imposed pursuant to this section.

(2) Removal of sanctions

Upon suspending or terminating any action imposed under the authority of subsection (a), the President shall report to the committees described in paragraph (1) on such suspension or termination.

(3) Submission of classified information

Reports submitted under this subsection may include an annex with classified information regarding the basis for the determination made by the President under paragraph (1)(A).

© Law enforcement and intelligence activities not affected

Nothing in this section prohibits or otherwise limits the authorized law enforcement or intelligence activities of the United States, or the law enforcement activities of any State or subdivision thereof.

(d) Omitted

(e) Implementation

(1) Delegation of authority

The President may delegate any authority granted by this section, including the authority to designate foreign persons under paragraphs (1)(B) and (1)© of subsection (a).

(2) Promulgation of rules and regulations

The head of any agency, including the Secretary of Treasury, is authorized to take such actions as may be necessary to carry out any authority delegated by the President pursuant to paragraph (1), including promulgating rules and regulations.

(3) Opportunity for review

Such rules and regulations shall include procedures affording an opportunity for a person to be heard in an expeditious manner, either in person or through a representative, for the purpose of seeking changes to or termination of any determination, order, designation or other action associated with the exercise of the authority in subsection (a).

(f) Definition of foreign persons

In this section, the term “foreign person” means any citizen or national of a foreign state or any entity not organized under the laws of the United States, including a foreign government official, but does not include a foreign state.

(g) Construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed as precluding judicial review of the exercise of the authority described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 111, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1484.)

According to this act, the petitioner would like to describe about the Human trafficker of the Kissinger:No statutes of the United States of America, no any international conventions, and no treaties of the government of the United States of America shall be allowed to the Kissinger making for human trafficker. In fact, the Kissinger did not enforce Paris Peace Accords and the United States Statutes of Foreign Assistance Acts of the Vietnam War when the Kissinger was torn the Paris Peace Accords and H.R. 7885. For the H.R. 7885 and H.R. 5490 were solemnly enacting for the whole world and the American people that, “No department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this Act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational institution. Approved December 16, 1963, 11 am.”On the other hand, the Kissinger has distorted all of the Vietnam War policies of the government of the United States of America, or so-called the Kissinger has distorted the American justice. Lets him take advantage of human trafficker putting on the head of the Southern officers, soldiers, and police. In fact, no article of the Paris Peace Accords shall be sold off the South Vietnam to communism when the Paris Peace Accords has been maintained peace for the Vietnamese people, in which they could resolve ideologies each other. However, the Kissinger did not enforce Paris Peace Accords when he has got the South Vietnam in order to human trafficker. Because the government of the United States of America has been supported funding aid for the South Vietnam lets republic of Vietnam give ear to the United States of America in order to anti — communism — and then, the Kissinger has used the South troop, police, and the Vietnamese people for selling to Chinese communists because the Chinese communists have been controlling for the Northern communists. After that, the Kissinger has sold off the South Vietnam to communism, so the North Vietnam has sent all of the Southern officers, soldiers, and police to imprison for the long run. As a result, the Kissinger took advantage of prisoners of war; he has exchanged them with the North Vietnam. Lets him build relationship diplomacy with the North Vietnam. Ironically, the government of the United States of America has enacted a statute’s 8 U.S code § 1157, in which’s “Bright Them Home.” That base on 26 U.S code § 112 to belong to №2014–01 of October 2, 2013 or Section 552©(2) & 614 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 for the Vietnam War. But the Kissinger did not enforce this statute, the Kissinger has borrowed to the hands of International Organization for Migration (IOM) and since, the petitioner must be paid all of the airplanes tickets. As the petitioner and his family must be repaid all of the costs of airplanes tickets to International Organization for Migration when the petitioner must be loaned debt for high rates. But the government of the United States of America had not consider to the properties of the petitioner were nationalized by Vietnamese communists and Mr. Kissinger doing. Since his family was from Vietnam to the United States of America. But the petitioner, his wife, and children did not have benefits of the 8 U.S code § 1157. When the petitioner has come to the United States of America, the petitioner was trained by coolie job. For the County of San Mateo has sent him to Goodwill company, it told him work with many America mental cases and crimes, but they have received their salaries, the petitioner was paid for thirty six dollars per month. The county of San Mateo did not consider to his former job is Sculptor when the many American Universities have been training this job to all of the students. As a result, the Kissinger did not consider to Human Right of the United States of America and international convention. So the petitioner would think of his civil rights case when he quoted, ” Perform justice is peaceful, but anti- justice — as demagogy.” Appendix of Statement evidence:1. A picture of the petitioner’s police of Republic of Vietnam was graduated in 19732. Certificate of Dismissal from Camp of Nguyen Xuan Quang (Bright Quang)3. Certificate of Nationalization # 26189204 (Bright Quang)4. Petition for Name change of Quang Xuan Nguyen to Bright Quang5. American Council for Voluntary International Action (Interaction)The following persons:Nguyen Xuan Quang Number 73319309 Day of birth 06 Sep 48 Sex MHuynh Ton Nu Thi Ngu # 73319310 Day of birth 22 June 47 Sex FNguyen Thi Bich Lien #73319311 Day of birth 29 July 71 Sex FNguyen Thi Bich Thu #73319312 Day of birth 02 Aug 73 Sex FNguyen Trong Ton #73319313 Day of birth 25 July 74 Sex MNguyen Trong Tri #73319314 Day of birth 18 Mar 83 Sex MNguyen Trong Thang #73319315 Day of birth 10 Nov. 88 Sex MNguyen Thi Bich Thuy # the Petitioner sponsored # Day of birth 1 June 1970 Sex FNguyen Bao Duc # the Petitioner sponsored # Day of birth 12 June 1975 Sex M6. San Mateo Medical Center- a County System of healthcare — Rehabilitation Services.Audiology Services7. MEDICAL REPORT Aid to Family with Dependent Children (AFDC)8. Marriage Certificate of Nguyen Xuan Quang (Bright Quang & Huyen, Ton Nu Thi Ngu9. Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo has awarded letter.10. Letter of President Bill Clinton 11. Art Degree in College of Country Art of Republic of Vietnam graduated in 1971 12. Certificate of Registration — Registration Number: TX 7–780–619Title work is How Good Should I Dream

  1. Certificate of Registration — Registration Number: United States Copyrights Office

TX 6–377–842. Title of this work: Road to the United States Part I

  1. Certificate of Registration — Registration Number: United States Copyrights Office

TX 6–404–116. Title of this work: Road to the United States Part II

  1. -United States — Copyright office — Type of Work: Text — Vietnamese American Arts

Registration Number/Date TX0007748469 -2013–07–08

  1. Art — On — Google -Amazon.com — http://www.albris.com
  2. San Mateo Medical Center — Prescription # 049787–11/29/07
  3. Supplemental Certification — 02/20/08 by Doctor Ho Beffer
  4. Driver Medical Evaluation Date May 7, 2009- Bright Quang Driver licensed B4547245
  5. Driver Medical Evaluation Date March 1 9, 2010- Bright Quang Driver licensed B4547245
  6. Driver Medical Evaluation Date March 26,2012- Bright Quang Driver licensed B4547245
  7. California Department of Motor Vehicles ***Customer Receipt Copy***

Driver License/Identification Card — Information request — 01/09/2015

  1. Supplemental Driving Performance Evaluation Score Sheet- Date 12/10/2009 — Bright Quang Driver licensed B4547245 — Number of errors: DQ
  2. Order of Suspension/Revocation — code 13953 — date 1/8/2010 by Jackie for lack of knowledge and lack of skills
  3. Notice of Finding and Decision Code14105 -Date April 19, 2010 by Barbara Schmidt for lack of knowledge and lack of skills
  4. Notice of Finding and Decision Code14103 Date September 22, 2009 by Jackie for a mental condition
  5. by June 29, 2011 by Social Security Administration Important Information
  6. State of California -Health and Human Services Agency -Department of Social Services by Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor by August 30,2011- DDS Case Number: 1249049
  7. State of California -Health and Human Services Agency -Department of Social Services by Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor by September15,2011 -DDS Case Number: 1249049 by Health Analysis INC 689 E Santa Clara ST — Suite # 208
  8. State of California -Health and Human Services Agency -Department of Social Services by Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor by August 30,2011- DDS Case Number: 1028519 — Date January 28, 2009 MDSI Physician Group — On 02/17/2009 at 12:30 P.M
  9. Social Security Administration — Supplemental Security Income — laim Number: 620–68–9115- Date November 22, 2011
  10. Your Social Security Statement — Prepared especially for Bright Quang by 44 U.S. Code § 3507.
  11. Student Loan Debt Summary by 5 CFR part 537 that follow 5 CFR Part 537 — REPAYMENT OF STUDENT LOANS. Direct Loans — Loan Listing.
  12. Business Licensed By Republic of Vietnam before 1975

Address 49 Free Way, Tinh Son District — property of Bright Quang

Respectfully Yours

Bright Quang

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.