Dear Sir,
If you are a lawyer of International law, you may review the case of the Vietnam War. If you are a law of Divorce, family or traffic law , you can’t review to my case of the Vietnam War . Because the American Court did not allow lawyers to helping for International law when they did not have International Law license. The case of the Vietnam war is complex, which is just belongs to International Law- and in fact, the Paris Peace Accords, 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604.December 23, 1950 Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714, and 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970 are belongs to the International Law because the United States Congress were approved.
According to 28 U.S.C § 1346. June 25,1948, which is belongs to American President. In fact, the President Kennedy has had orders to murder president Ngo Dinh Diem. But the American lawyers have used to 28 U.S.C. § 1346.b-June 25, 1948, which is belongs to public agency. So, almost of the American lawyers have using this chapter, which is belongs to the Kissinger- however, the American Court did not allow to Federal Tort Clam Act if the petitioner is against to Public Agency without true evidences.
Because my case of the Vietnam was is belongs to International law- and therefore, I use Self help code when I do exactly prove the United States statutory of the Vietnam War.
If you are unable to review to the case of the Vietnam War, you should review to Table of Contents below. because the government of the United States of America could not deceive us “Republic of Vietnam” by its injustice power without law.
Finally, If you are patriotic Republic of Vietnam, you should review to Table of Contents when I carry out the Rule of law.
No._____________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
________________________________
CIV: 538988
Confidential Document: 532272
_________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
________________________________
BRIGHT QUANG
Petitioner
V.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent.
_________________________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORRARI TO
THE UNITED STATES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
_______________________
Self Help: Bright Quang
217 5th Ave # 8
Redwood City, CA 94063
(TEL) 650–278–9542
(Email) bright_qng@yahoo.com
CAPITAL CASE
QUESTION/PRESENTED
I. How does he make a claim for Federal Tort Claims Act l House.gov for his lost fortune of investment, his Republic of Vietnam, and imprisoned benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War- whether his personal injuries, his father who was death without governments duties, which were not give any Death Certificate when Republic of Vietnam and the United States of America were partnerships each other.
II. What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were left on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign Assistance Act of the United States of America in 1963, because of Socialism Republic of Vietnam did not have any international relations with the government of the US and Republic of Vietnam.
III. Would somehow can the defendant’s statutory 28 U.S.C § 1346. June 25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness of the family plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to should he do for defendant’s US that’s self confessed wrongful actions of his litigation.
IV. Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the United States Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United States of America of the Vietnam War.
TABLE OF PARTIES
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
QUESTIONS PRESENTED……………………………………………………………………….. i
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA………………………………………………………. i
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ………………………………………………. …………………. vii
OPINIONS BELOW …………………………………………… …………………………………… 1
JURISDICTION …………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………………..2
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND……………………………………. 2
STATEMENT OF THE CASE…………………………………………………………..1..to..55
APPENDIX……………………………………………………………………………………57 to 308
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES……………………………………………………………iv to vii
S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE……………………………………………………………………………………………………..2
9.11 PARTICULAR RIGHTS — FIRST AMENDMENT — “CITIZEN” PLAINTIFF 42 U.S.C.§1983……………………………………………………………………….3
22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527…………………4
22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105.
Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473……………………………………………………………………….5
22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461……….5
18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322…………………6
10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;
Pub. L. 85–729………………………………………………………………………………. ……….. 6
22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714
December 23, 1950……………………………………………………………………………….7
H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963……………………………………………… 7
H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved. December 16, 1963………………………..8
22 USC§ 2151 Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept 4,1961……10
22 USC§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance
December 20, 1975……………………………………………………………………………..10
5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966………………………………………..11
18 U.S.C. § 227-Wrongfully influencing.Sep.14,2007…………………………….11
26 U.S.C. § 7701.Definition Aug.16,1954…………………………………………….12
28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948……………………………………12
21 USC§ 848- Oct. 27 1970………………………………………………………………..13
1 USC§ 112a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950…………………………….14
1 USC§ 112-General Provision-July 30, 1947……………………………………….15
1 USC§ 112b. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972……….16
37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6,1966………………………………………………………………..16
5 U.S.C. § 552a-December 31,1974……………………………………………………. 17
38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958……………………………………………..18
38 U.S.C. §§ 1116–1311-Feb. 6, 1991-…………………………………………………18
1 U.S.C. § 113 -July 30,1947…………………………………………………………….. 18
22 U.S.C. § 7108. — Sep.22, 1961………………………………………………………..19
35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982………………………….20
Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983………………………………………………….22
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals………………………………………..22
Title VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000D…………………………………………..22
28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………………………………..23
California Vehicle Code Section 14103,14105, and 13953……………………24
18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948……25
California Civil Code§§§ 44,45a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander……25
§46 Division1. person [38–86]…………………………………………………………..26
42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;
Aug. 14, 1935………………………………………………………………………………..26
17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………………………..27
17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;
Oct. 19, 1976………………………………………………………………………………..29
42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990……………………31
CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-……………………………………………….33
CACI №3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual………………………………….33
28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948……………………………………………..34
44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;
May 22, 1995………………………………………………………………………………..36
5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-……………………………………….37
S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism …………………………………39
50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;…………………………..40
50 U.S.C. §4101 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the
United States; July 3, 1948-…………………………………………………………..44
28 U.S.C. § 1346b-June 25, 1948-…………………………………………………45
28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;………………………………….46
28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims;
June 25, 1948……………………………………………………………………………..46
28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948……………………….47
28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948……………….47
28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948………………………………..48
Amendment XIV………………………………………………………………………..49
22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Unannotated Title 22. Transfer of
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
to Department of Justice………………………………………………………………49
22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions………………………………………49
22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims………………………..50
22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation……………………….51
22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory………………………..52
22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980………… ..52
22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement …………………..52
18 U.S.C. § 2340A- Torture…………………………………………………………53
What does he somehow understand about to Rule of law or Rule by law of the government of the United States of America because Distort justice is national traitor?
…

Table of Contents

Written by Bright Quang