You’re the one who’s making the claim, you’re the one that needs to point to real evidence of…
SaintHeartwing
2

You’re just throwing out red herrings all over the place now. Stop squirming. The argument you brought to me was the absurd, baseless assertion that as long as the DNC didn’t hack voting machines or make their own anti-Sanders ads, they’re not in violation of the Impartiality Clause. Defend this amazing feat of intellectual dishonesty in your very next comment or I’m blocking you.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.