This story is unavailable.

It isn’t science until it is PEER reviewed. This is a case of pseudoscience with a political agenda. No reputable scientific publication would touch this piece of horse ****. I’d like to see what PEER reviewed SCIENTIFIC studies that the pseudoscience was based on and look at the raw data. I bet there isn’t any. That’s just a hunch.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.