Great article, apart from this:
“In contrast [to React], Angular 2 is a careful, methodical reinvention of a mature, comprehensive framework. So Angular is less likely to churn in painful ways after release”
Seriously? You really think that React’s “breaking changes” are in the same league as the enormous rug pull that Angular inflicted with its version 2?
I know Angular developers who are still enduring uncomfortable conversations with their higher ups about this. “Yeah, but Google wouldn’t dare do that again” doesn’t seem a very comforting argument to me.