This is an evolution of “HOWTO Send an email using Gmail from a system configuration using msmtp and heirloom-mailx (Ubuntu)” that you can find here.
The password manager package that is being used here is called secret-tool and is part of the libsecret tools package. Documentation on this tool is available from http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/focal/man1/secret-tool.1.html.
To save a password:
secret-tool store — label=msmtp host smtp.gmail.com
(when prompted type in app generated password)
To verify that the password has been entered correctly:
secret-tool lookup host smtp.gmail.com
Modify the /etc/msmtprc config file:
sudo nano /etc/msmtprc
replace password line with
passwordeval “secret-tool lookup host smtp.gmail.com”
The following procedure describes the steps to follow to create a solution what will send out an email. This was verified on Ubuntu (both server and GUI platforms). The setting will be stored as a system configuration rather than a user configuration (in which each user have their specific settings).
The reasons to configure the solution to use a system configuration are:
1. The settings are global and can therefore be used by multiple users.
2. One can send an email before a user has logged in. In this HOWTO we program the system so that it send an email whenever the computer boots (no user yet logged in).
It is disappointing to discover that LinkedIn have been looking up peoples clipboard even when it is not active. The official explanation given is dry and needs much more explaining.
People use their clipboard to store sensitive data such as passwords in password managers and other sensitive exchanges. There could be sensitive medical data and other GDPR information.
LinkedIn is the organization that promotes itself as being for professionals. This behaviour is very unprofessional.
LinkedIn MUST answer the following questions:
1. Was this behaviour only in IOS or is it universal.
2. This is not a bug, this is a function. What was the justification for such a behaviour in the first place? …
It would be safe to say that the South Korean conglomerate Samsung produces almost anything under the sun. It is present in every market and dominates or leads in most. Many-a-times Samsung gets it right but sometimes it does not. This is one story when Samsung got it wrong and how Samsung is blatantly breaking the consumer protection safeguards aimed to protect customers from this type of behaviour.
Samsung is producing internet connected Smart TVs that are not able to be updated with functional and security patches. Many of these TVs are under warranty and some are still being sold to date. …
It is possible to set up your computer so that sites that dish out malware as well as sites that are of an adult nature are prohibited from loading. Even though adults may have varying opinions regarding adult-related content, one can universally agree that there is enormous benefit to protect against sites that can harm the privacy and data belonging to computer users. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people are spending less time going out and about their daily lives. They spend more time clicking links, engaging with virtual persons and roaming the corners of the internet they would have in the pre-COVID-19 days. …
· If in doubt don’t click it
· If it is too good to be true then it is
· Your boss will not come to you for help on topics that are not your job description
· Use your phone: If you need to confirm an email call the sender
· Does it look right to you — is it phrased well / is the style of writing the same as previous exchanges with the person / do the links appear to related to valid websites?
· NEVER install any program specially to do something that is illegal (watch pirated content, visit blocked sites…
My article titled Why you should not vote for 70 year old presidential candidates generated considerable feedback. My original article made a case that people who are in their 70s are not the best suited to be President of the USA. I rarely revisit or defend a topic, but after 77 year old Michael Bloomberg announced that he has joined the presidential race I felt this would be appropriate.
The US constitution states that a person needs to be at least 35 years old to be eligible to become President. When the minimum presidential age was established, the voting age was 21 year. In 1971, 26th amendment reduced the voting age from 21 to 18 yet the minimum presidential age was never revised. Today there is a movement seeking to bring the voting age further down to 16 because proponents feel these individuals have the depth of comprehension and maturity equivalent to 18-year olds from a couple of generations before. …
The reason for putting forward a Democratic candidate against Donald Trump is “to secure the largest number of Electoral Colleges to ensure that the person is elected as the 46th President of the United States of America”.
The candidate will, in all likelihood, face incumbent Donald Trump as the Republican candidate. Donald Trump became president last time because he won more Electoral Colleges even though he got almost 3 million votes less than Hilary Clinton. …
Why is it that a bunch of septuagenarians are coming forward to lead the US? On the Republican side we have 73 year old Donald Trump while on the Democratic ticket, three of the top 5 candidates will be their 70s on inauguration day. These individuals are, at least, 3 years older than the revised retirement age in the US. Looking at it from another angle, all of them were born before 1950. Are these the top people the United States of America can put forward to take the country towards the challenges that it faces and are they the best choice we have to navigate and identify the landscape of opportunities that present themselves? …
The road to an early election after the October 31st Brexit deadline was missed reminds me of the “I have a cunning plan” by Baldrick from the UK series Blackadder. For anyone who has not watched the series my only comment is that you don’t know what you’re missing. The Baldrick character was a run down sidekick who was downright stupid and naive.
After parliament forced the hand of Boris Johnson, the UK’s prime minister, to seek [yet another] extension from the EU, Mr Johnson decided to call an election. Labour, out of a desperate desire to have its leader, Jeremy Corbyn, lead the country supported the bid to go to the polls. …