Jul 24, 2017 · 1 min read
I agree on adding liquidity. But I worry that you make a fundamental split b tokenizing art (versus other asset types) Whole art has intrinsic (aesthetic) value. A digital share in an art piece does not, because nobody would pay to see my digital share. So it’s not exactly apples to apples.
The interesting concept is the lease fees. So if the Mona Lisa generates daily revenue which is paid out to token holders, I can understand that. Is that correct?