This story is unavailable.

Al Gore is not allowing for any nuance. Undoubtedly, Hillary might do what’s needed for reducing carbon emissions. I said “might.” At least, she probably won’t do nothing nor push climate denial. Trump, on the other hand, is a total loss when dealing with climate issues.

However, because the Electoral College makes it 50 separate contests, that thinking only applies in a swing state such as Iowa. I live in California, which Hillary will not lose. I will not vote for the corruption, lies, flip-flopping, and all-around lack of honesty that Hillary represents.

If we had a direct popular election system, it would be different. But if we are going to change the voting system, we could also add ranked choice voting and/or proportional representation and make it easier for people to vote for what they want.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.