While I like this as a general concept, I think there are lots of potential exceptions for things…
Luna Lunapiena
1

I agree with this (comment above). While I accept and understand the general principle, there are a few reasons why someone may be unavailable even if they’re really “into” the other person. Workaholics also come to mind (whether they’re artist, in a life-saving profession, whatever). It may mean that they are not completely emotionally or otherwise available for the kind of commitment that the author envisions as most people’s goal/ideal…. but it doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re not “into” and maybe even in love with the other person. In fact, the more “into” someone I am at first… the more I may try to maintain some space until I feel less vulnerable and more safe. In my experience, not all “real relationships” start as ga-ga kids acting like they’re in their 20s. I say this from the perspective of a person who’s been on the planet for more than half of a century who lives with PTSD and other consequences of sexual trauma. Maybe your experience is shared by many… but not all of us all of the time.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.