Many Shades of Truth
But the truth seeker, on a way to It, must be capable to distinct between the two: the truth revealing and the truth concealing.
It seems there has been a protracted script chronicling the struggle between the two — to such an extent that you may safely presume: all the lavishness of human history evolves along the imaginary axis of a two-side process: truth revealing<X>truth concealing. And it seems the two are unimaginable to be separated in their perpetual motion.
One have to dig deep into history of the humankind in order to see the ‘origins of species of the Truth’.
And then, one might wonder, ‘How much have things changed since then — since the beginning of history?’
Bets are for the answer, ‘not too much’. And this is neither good nor bad. The fact THINGS have been changing — is an encouraging news. Yet the fact they have been changing slowly— is not a reason for a pessimistic worldview to hold sway over the observing minds.
Let me put just one remark: Truth is not immediately the Fairness.
Here’s a good piece of reading illustrating the point, follow the link”
Truth was relative; every question had two sides.
There was an interesting question put, eh?
‘Why choose to serve evil?’
P.S.
If you ever consider stepping on a truth-seeker trail, go get a lead in the ancient Greek history. Seriously.
Skinny-dip into the ‘Ethos’, surface up reformed, and express yourself eloquently with ‘Pathos’ :)



