Since the Party has only deigned to schedule four debates, I’d like to respond with four things I find depressing
- I agree with Senator Chambliss on something. Try something new every day, I suppose.
- The Democratic Party has decided that among its principles is the utility of exclusivity agreements. I wonder if “total world domination” is also there. “The power of monopolies”? What is the principle underlying the exclusivity agreement?
- The Democratic Party gives no acknowledgment that there are fewer debates this year, or that many people want more. The May announcement is absurd — six debates are “consistent with the precedent” set in past years? Really?
- While the Democratic Party will, I believe, be punished in the general election for this schedule, we the voters will be the ones who suffer. We’re being punished because a small group of people have turned an election into a coronation.
This was shady move, representative.