A 30 pyeong apartment in Seoul is 100 million…”In fact or ‘out of the ordinary’ investigation”
Kim Soo-jin, a reporter for the Yonhap News Agency, said, “The 30 pyeong apartment in Seoul was traded for 100 million won.
The controversy started when Rep.
According to the data, the highest apartment price in the area was Acryver Park (84.99 square meters) in Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, which was traded at 2.88 billion won on Aug. 31, 2007.
스포츠토토사이트추천The apartment was introduced to the media as the least expensive apartment in Seoul for 100 million won, but the gap between the market price and the data raised questions.
In fact, according to the real estate transaction disclosure system by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the same apartment sale was changed to 379 million won and 389 million won, respectively.
It is true that the apartment was reported for 100 million won after confirming the fact with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the Seoul Metropolitan Government.
However, the possibility of reporting false information such as whether the sale was actually made at 100 million won or not, and whether a down payment was made is currently under investigation.
The Gwanak District Office, which is a local administrative body, was informed of the transaction by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in March and submitted prima facie evidences from buyers and sellers and finished the first review in late May.
The Gwanak-gu Office held a judgment on whether the deal should be regarded as an ideal transaction as it was submitted with evidence that the deal was made between a parent company (the buyer) and the seller (the seller).
Meanwhile, the Seoul Metropolitan Government and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport began a joint investigation into the illegal real estate transaction in late August, and decided to reinvestigate the transaction while looking into past reports.
A source at the Gwanak-gu Office said on Thursday that it is not an ideal deal because there are many transactions between family members that are suspected of giving gifts, and because the price is not necessarily low in market prices.