It isn’t “evil” per se. It just shows an extreme conflict of interest. $250,000.00 for a twenty minute speech is not about the speech, it’s about access. If the speeches aren’t a big deal she would just release them, however she won’t do that. An attendee of one of the speeches reported that it was just a rah-rah speech and the core message was “job well done, guys!” — this to a group of criminals who knowingly sold worthless mortgage bonds that resulted in 8 million people losing their homes and retirement savings. That doesn’t look good when you want those same millions of people to vote for you. It does look a little evil when you put the tone and content of the speeches into the context that it was delivered.

Combine that with the millions of dollars she gets from special interests and bundlers to disguise how she gets the money from special interests. The system is gamed against the working class and the middle class who foot the bill for bail outs while big corporations take a pass on paying any meaningful taxes, commit crimes without consequences, and end up wealthier after they crashed the global economy.