The problems with anti-Ahok demonstrations
The alleged blasphemy never existed in the first place. It’s obvious how the incriminating video was edited by Buni Yani, a proudly irresponsible and victim card-playing human being.
The editing is so obvious, even for the untrained eyes. All you need is to use your brain. Well, if you have one, anyway.
Easily offended Muslims
Whether Ahok was being blasphemous or not, that’s irrelevant. If he was, so what?
Are we so fragile against criticism of our own religion? Do we really believe everyone must love Islam?
If Islam is really the truest and strongest of all religions, do we really need to defend it so aggressively to the point of making the complete opposite impression?
I am sure the people who got offended by Ahok’s so-called blasphemy love to offend the sentiment of other religious groups. The right of being angry is exclusively theirs.
Naming the December 2nd demonstration as a “peaceful act”
Demonstration was done in the first place because certain people possessed hatred against someone that they deem offend them.
Demonstrators were caught red-handed harassing reporters.
FPI, who is no stranger sectarianism and extremism, was involved in the demonstration.
They did their Friday prayer in the middle of the road, disturbing other road users. The prayer could have been done in mosques.
They also promise more demonstrations in the future. They won’t stop until Ahok is arrested for something he didn’t do.
Is it appropriate to call this divisiness “peaceful”?
The wrapped rice army
It’s not a secret in Indonesia. Many of us are willing to demonstrate for the sake of rice and small allowance. Whether they understand the message of the demonstration, it doesn’t matter. Just give them the rewards.
It is tempting to Indonesians who live in poverty. But, I know that many of us are willing to whore ourselves even for the smallest rewards.
Money-oriented news coverage
I am delighted about the two counter-demonstrations. They may not have any depth. They may be used as vehicles for political parties. But, that doesn’t matter. What matters is their explicit message about the beauty of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity), especially in this increasingly sectarian age.
But, I am disappointed with the coverage by the media, both domestic and foreign, who focused too much on the anti-Ahok demonstrations and too little on the counter ones. Bad news thicken our pockets.
This kind of coverage unwittingly portrays those humans of hatred as the representatives of all mankind, as if their views are the only ones that matter. In the end, they are given more power the peace-loving and pluralist human beings.
Because of their great influence, the media has a responsibility for the society. But then, they think profit is more important.
I am one of the people who oppose it.
Even though I hate what people say about my religion, I also believe in individual freedoms. I cannot force others to love my religion like I do. I also have to learn to not get offended easily.
More often than not, a statement is considered as blasphemous…if it contradicts with the views of many. Figures like Quraish Shihab and Ulil Abshar Abdallah have such statements.
They never intended to be that way. What they do is having their own interpretations of the scripture. The problem rises when others disagree with them.
This legislation is dangerous because it prosecutes anyone who dares to think differently.
Naming the demonstrations as “defense of Islam”
Do you want to beautify our name? Show that we actually deserve respect.
Show the world that we are peace-loving.
Show them that we are intelligent and willing to have civilised conversations.
Show them that we are willing to treat everyone humanely, not matter what their backgrounds are.
But, that’s not what have been done. Some of us are aroused to do the opposite: being divisive, refusing conversation and even encouraging violence to each other…
…and all of those done in the name of Islam and Muslims.
If that’s how you live your life, don’t call yourself defenders of Islam. In fact, it seems you make efforts to taint the imagine of our religion and our people.
You should be the ones prosecuted for blasphemy, not Ahok.