You guys are all about slinging the racist charge against anybody who disagrees with you.
In the case of Philandro Castile, he told the officer that he had a gun, then reached into his pocket as the cop shouted at him “don’t reach.” The officer, a Hispanic, BTW, may have reacted inappropriately, but a normal person who is not blinded by hatred toward police can understand why he reacted that way.
In the John Crawford case, the police responded to a potential active shooter call and ran into Mr. Crawford who was, inexplicably, carrying an out of the box replica assault rifle in the store. Again, you can understand what the officers were thinking.
Mr. Garner was struggling with officers when he was wrestled to the ground. He was an overweight man in poor health who collapsed due to a number of factors. The police didn’t shoot him, nor can you say that the police used excessive force. Remember, the grand jury looked at the case and didn’t bring an indictment.
In the case of Ms. Damond, there was no reason to believe that she was armed nor did she take any action that would have indicated that she was dangerous in any way.
That you can’t distinguish between that situation and the cases you cited indicates an irrational hatred for police to the point that you can’t distinguish between a justified shooting, a mistake in judgement, and murder.