The letting agents who cried wolf?

Daniel Farey-Jones
Feb 23, 2017 · 2 min read

If your own data undermines your warnings about rent increases it might be best to keep quiet.

‘The Boy Who Cried Wolf’ woodcut by Francis Barlow

Another month, another Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) warning that the buy-to-let tax changes and a crackdown on letting agents’ fees will inevitably result in higher rents.

But if ARLA actually bothered to look at the data they gather from their letting agent members, they might pause for thought.

Every month they ask members whether they’re seeing rents increase; here’s a graph I’ve made from the results since January 2015.

Clearly the situation has not become worse but better for tenants.

And here’s a funny thing. The tax changes were announced in July 2015, which prompted many professional landlords to pause adding to their portfolios but also produced a rush in the first quarter of 2016 from many people motivated by getting into buy-to-let ‘before it is too late’.

Rent increases became less common from July 2015 to December 2015, then more common during the rush to beat stamp duty, then dropped off again.

It’s almost as if the transfer of a property into the private rented sector (or from one landlord to another) actually increases rents.

Daniel Farey-Jones

Written by

I’m a freelance journalist with a strong interest in the UK’s rather dysfunctional housing market

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade