Become a member
Sign in
The Big Lie of the Google Employee’s Anti-Diversity Manifesto: Biology is why Women…
1K
100
Dare Obasanjo
Dan Kallhoff
Dan Kallhoff
Aug 9, 2017 · 1 min read

The main claim being refuted here is that the career choices are influence “in part” by biological differences. The burden of proof to refute this claim is to show that there is no significant biological difference in this regard, not to find other causes that are also “in part”. In this regard the refutation fails.

    Dan Kallhoff

    Written by

    Dan Kallhoff

    Write the first response

    Discover Medium

    Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch

    Make Medium yours

    Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore

    Become a member

    Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade
    AboutHelpLegal