So that was a solid interview on your part — and maybe less good on Pelley’s part. I agree with you far more than I thought I would. But what responsibility do you have to readers when you know many will misinterpret what you say, draw improper conclusions, and perhaps act on them? I see this prob regularly with MSM regularly, but also with your Susan Rice story. You are providing facts for people to mis-use, getting further away from truth, not closer to it. Perhaps that’s really more a problem of the hedline writers?