Dan Munro: what are some examples of the “existing, robust, and tested technology” that you mention…
Kim Bellard

Many open-source or commercial databases can be used in a distributed fashion (either as homogenous or heterogenous) to create a distributed “ledger.” Most cryptography (open source or commercial) is industrial strength, and timestamping isn’t a new idea. Those three combined — in software — can easily duplicate all of the “features” of a blockchain — except one.

What they can’t do (in simple combination) is solve for “double spending.” So where does the problem of double-spending occur? Cryptocurrencies (like Bitcoin). This is also why the first success of a blockchain was a cryptocurrency. It was also a compelling business solution for people who want/need anonymity (for a host of reasons — including illegal activity including laundering and tax avoidance).

That’s just the technology. The business challenge is even harder because in order for any “blockchain” to be successful — it requires voluntary agreement on the part of competing commercial interests that will increase their legal liability and decrease their revenue. Does that sound remotely like something healthcare will embrace?

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.