The greatest nation every conceived by the society of man, America, died and no one knows the date.

Once upon a time when men were struggling for reason, a nation was created with a simple foundation. That bedrock, the foundations of that concept for a nation, was so miraculous, that many never comprehended what it was. That same wonder, that did create that nation, was — as Socrates was compelled to drink the Hemlock tea, causing his death — the same poison that by application, of the wonder of the nation’s design killed the nation.
The question that must be asked, can something die, when so many, never knew what it was to begin with? If there is something that so few know, or recognize, and it passes from the history of man, did it die, or in reality was that it never was?
Yet we know it was, the records of our nation for a few glorious years, exists giving but a small glimpse of the miracle of man’s creation that the nation named the United States of America, did exist.
The beginning of this nation, came as close to the visions identified by John Locke — one of the principle philosophers, and political idealist — on which that great experiment, the United States was based.
John Locke’s observations have merit in the reality of fact that they are.
‘That there is no instances to be found in story of a company of men, independent and equal amongst another, that met together, and in this way began and set up a government.
Tis impossible of right that men should do so, because all men being born under government, they are to submit to that, and are not at liberty to begin a new one.’
Who can challenge the reality that this observation is, from the known history of mankind a fact? From what is known of man’s history, all nations are, from what beginning we are not certain, or conquered by others, forever changing the governance of that nation conquered. History is wrought with examples of one society, through military conquest, capturing and then compelling the society of those conquered to submit to the construct of the conquerors governance.
Yet what is the one thing, the foundations of what the nation that once was, the United States, once built of for the nation of their design? There are those who have advanced many observations, some say that all men are equal. That’s close, but what is the application of all men are equal? That they cannot advance of even comprehend. Instead, they advance this segment, that all are equal, as the Hemlock that is destroying this nation. They did not mean that all men are the same, and that all men are equal. How could they, who can say that all men are the same. What irrational reasoning would it require for anyone, or any society, in some illusion of faith in a cult refuting reason, accepts such?
Is it so difficult to comprehend what those who, in a state of, though they had a governance, decided to affirm and create a new government, with the foundations of their heritage, attempted, and succeeded in creating the greatest concept of governance ever known to the species of mankind.
What was the government they began from? How sad that so many have no knowledge of what this nation was created from. Who in this nation, can tell you, that the concept of rights — that thing that currently is unknown, unconsidered, and dismissed — is, and always has been the foundations of what this nation’s idealism was established. Who today can realize that the rights of the individual, and rejecting the rights of the state, or the king, or any other governance began with the Charter of Liberties, also called the Coronation Charter. A written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his accession to the throne in 1100. It sought to bind the King to certain laws regarding the treatment of nobles, church officials, and individuals; and it make the King as a citizen, compliant with the laws, as all others.
What words can anyone have today, when we are experiencing the exact opposite of this conclusion by the very representative government — our congress, and their minions — are removed from the very legislation, the laws of this nation, with the absolute abomination of the Affordable Care Act. When, when in our society, has the idea that we have in our midst though that are above the same laws that all others must comply? What has happened that the citizens of this nation have allowed the representatives of government to be elevated to some position of royalty, above the same laws that govern all others?
What is more of an example than the travesty of the Affordable Care Act, how can the congress of this nation, making the law that is a totalitarian dictatorship, decree that the society of all people, must comply with the same laws they make — as our representatives — then rescues themselves from the very laws they created?
Is this not the absolute inverse of the step of man, in the Charters of Liberties, that confined the power of the state — the King of England at the Time, Charles the 1st — to also be governed by the same laws and legislation placed upon all others?
The forefathers — those who began this nation — all had several things in their background from which to begin the evaluation, and with these foundations, began the creation, and the development of a nation that which the world had never known; nor will the world ever, ever know.
What was the magic excelsior that wonders idealism that resulted in a nation with idealism that the world had never known? The answer is as simple as the history of mankind itself.
In the early beginnings of mankind’s adventure into creating governments, the attempt and the journey was difficult, and not without successes, and failures. The history of which lasted the longest, or the objective of the powers of state that existed, are known only in the presentation of those who have made conclusions studying not the even in action, but the anthropology findings, and then making some hypothesis, some postulate of what the society was, or was it was not.
In the era, that moment of actions by Great Britain, when they under King George advanced the Intolerable Acts upon the citizens, the colonist of this new world nation. Their objective was a punitive actions against the citizens of this colonial nation, who rejected the totalitarian sovereignty of King and parliament, to dictate and dominate. The why, should all know, the rejection of the India’s tea tax, placed on the tea import to all of England’s colonies to support the government of India and the East India Company.
This division, the application of civil rights of the state, determining what citizens The rights of Englishmen are the perceived traditional rights of citizens of England. Some colonists that objected to British rule in the British colonies in North America argued that their traditional rights as Englishmen were being violated. This subsequently became a justification for the American Revolution.
The American colonies had since the 17th century been fertile ground for liberalism within the spectrum of European political discourse. However, as the ratification of the Declaration of Independence approached, the issue among the colonists of which particular rights were significant became divisive. George Mason, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, stated that ‘We claim nothing but the liberty and privileges of Englishmen in the same degree, as if we had continued among our brethren in Great Britain.’
The concept that the government decided to create division among those who were loyal citizens for the theft of taxation, created a question that to this day, history has no answer. What is known, the result, which in English past history, was that the citizens rejected this demeaning of rights, reducing them to second class citizens, and separated from the Empire of England.
This at the time, when the ‘Commentaries on the Laws of England’ were becoming an influential 18th-century treatise on the common law of England by Sir William Blackstone, originally published by in 1765–1769. The work, divided into four volumes, on the rights of persons, the rights of things, of private wrongs and of public wrongs. This was the same knowledge that was available to the colonist, and influenced the rights of laws, and the enumerations that the law placed on government. This influenced the colonist, the founders of this nation, with a different perspective of their observation of the concept of government, of men, and the relationship between that government, and the citizens of the nation that government governed. This was the result of over 600 years — and the inclusion of the English Reformation — from the dissolving the totalitarianism of the monarch, and the rights of, each and every, individual citizen.
Once the foundations of this nation’s design were broken, then the floodgates of more and more political insanity continued.
Today, currently, our government, congress, administration, state, and local government, spend most of their efforts creating means to collect more taxation, and more money to the government, than even considering the concept of the rights, or even the consideration of the citizens of this nation.
The mistakes made, the convoluted application of the laws to protect the rights of individuals, the very construct of this nation’s design, has been forgotten and replaced with false constructs that are the antithesis of our design.
The list is intense, the many ways, immeasurable. The results today this nation, not knowing the why of its design, is a nation not ever of anyone’s design, certainly not this nation.
As such, the basic construct of even this nation’s foundations, by those actions, has been veered from the course of our wonder, to one of a nation more like the European, or Communist design, than the nation, which we are.
The what we could have been is defined by John Stuart Mill in his Theism; stated this quite concise as: We accordingly call a people civilized, where the arrangements of society, for protecting the persons and property of its members, are sufficiently perfect to maintain peace among them.
Think of our nation today. Today the government through legislation to create hegemony — the division of our nation, into groups — that is destroying the homogeneous design of this nation’s wonder.
Why do we use civil rights, to destroy the rights of so many? Why is the government, creating divisions of our society, for political and political purpose only?
In the 1920’s a man who advanced his concept, his idiotology, of his own relative idolatry, calling it cultural communism, was Antonio Gramsci. His design, to destroy a Christian Capitalist nation was simple. As we watch what is happening in this nation, it is Gramsci’s design being worked by our outgoing administration of this nation mea maxima culpa, our greatest mistake, the intolerable president for this nation, obama. While we watch the courts, and this current congress, advancing every legislative insanity to destroy the very construct of this nation, as Gramsci designed, and our government is applying.
America became America to retain the rights from the state challenged by the government of Britain.
Today this nation is once again, under attack by a government determined to destroy our design. The fallacy is that this enemy, this corrupt dogmatic enemy of civilization is our own elected government.
That is the fear, the question, and the absolute irrational template of political parties run amuck forgetting — or never knowing — just what it is that once created the most wondrous nation ever of the design of man.
Are we capable of recovery? Can this nation ever return to what it was of its design, or is the reality of facts that we are so far from the design of what we were designed to be, there is no hope of this nation’s necessitation and recovery?