
Many of us have been following the well-worn paths of parents and grandparents and generations past. This path has led us, 9 to 5, from our front door to the car or bus, from the car or bus to the office door, and back again. Rinse, repeat, for years and years. In recent decades, some companies have tried their hand at re-inventing the traditional office space, looking beyond the four walls or cubicle, chair, computer, phone, in an attempt to re-brand as an innovative employer with a finger on the pulse of future generations. These changes have generally amounted to little more than superficial window dressing. We have continued to experience the personal restrictions of the office work-style that come with the bumps in the road created by illnesses, school holidays, caretaking of relatives, etc. There are case-by-case allowances for flexible schedules and remote work, also known as telecommuting. Overall, however, the office landscape has remained largely unaltered even in the face of changes in technology and the makeup of the labor force. …
For most of my adult life, I didn’t give electric vehicles much thought. My first recollection of seeing any type of electrified vehicle, hybrid or otherwise, was the Prius. It seemed like the type of car bought by very serious people or by modest, well-intentioned people who wore comfortable shoes and shopped at co-ops. Climate change was a whisper in the background; such vehicles were no more than car show novelties.

With the knowledge of humanity’s impact on the environment, both as an individual and as part of society, and the increase of my age and responsibilities, I started to weigh the value of my choices as a consumer more carefully. Much of the pollution and the larger share of global warming have been served up by corporate entities and sizable sources — not individuals. Yet individuals can serve as points of influence on the lifestyles of the people in their sphere of contact. Additionally, individuals in sum can exert a substantial collective pressure on the world around them, resulting in definitive change. I am reminded of a book I read a long time ago called The Hundredth Monkey: a new idea or behavior exhibited by a group of individuals increases to a critical number at which the behavior is no longer considered fringe action, but goes “mainstream.” …

When I scroll through the comments on area weather service announcements, I find myself feeling a mixture of emotions. There are the typical replies to forecasts of warmer-than-usual winter days from the “I’ll take it!” climate cheerleaders. I have the sense that I am a trespasser in their field of optimism, the unwelcome guest at a season-themed party. Increasingly, however, these cheery voices come off as projected from willful ignorance or as attempts at forced joviality. There is a growing population that mourns the dissolution of four marked seasons. It’s a gnawing apprehension of change.

There is plenty about climate change that is disquieting and urgent: from droughts to floods to enhanced storms to the extinction of species. Climate modeling has been uncomfortably accurate, almost conservative in some aspects when coupled with outlying dangers such as warming methane deposits. The scientists that have done the research and routinely speak out on these concerns are alternately insulted by deniers as doomsayers and grudgingly acknowledged by the average citizen as providers of grim knowledge. My purpose, as is the sentiment among the majority of climate scientists and advocates, is not to frighten anyone, but to encourage self-education and activism… and hope. When humans pull together, we bring out the best of our nature in the form of support and solutions. Secrecy, delay or denial, however, will not serve us. …

On a drive through local neighborhoods, I’m seeing more and more solar panels up on roofs — or maybe I’m just noticing them for the first time. Not only is solar energy becoming more prevalent in residential homes, but more and more businesses, non-profits and municipalities are investing in electricity generation from solar sources. It takes approximately 3.4 acres of solar panels to generate a gigawatt-hour of electricity over a year — translating this to a much larger scale, we would need about 13,600,000 acres (21,250 square miles) of solar panels to meet the total electricity requirements of the United States for a year. …
The notion of public ownership of utilities has been raised in the smoking specter of heightened forest fires — perhaps this is a crucial next step in abating the climate crisis.

Wildfires are once again raging in California and a state of emergency has been declared. The Kincade Fire ignited in Sonoma County on October 23 and quickly spread to an area twice the size of San Francisco while the Tick and Getty Fires have burned through nearly 5,000 acres in Los Angeles County. Over 200,000 people have evacuated their homes while hurricane-like winds blow up to 80 miles per hour. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), California’s largest utility, told state regulators that a broken jumper cable on one of its transmission towers may have caused the Kincade Fire, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle. This admission is an echo of last year when sparking PG&E wires were found to have started the record-breaking Camp Fire, which killed 86 people. In response to these spark-ups, nearly 3 million residents face days-long power outages as PG&E attempts to reduce wildfire risk, following two other preemptive outages conducted earlier in October, amid the continued windy and dry conditions. Shut-offs also hamper the ability of emergency teams to deal with these disasters, such as through disabling of water pumping stations and obstruction of mass transit. …

It’s really not fair to label either carbon dioxide (CO₂) or methane (CH₄) as criminal actors. Their function as greenhouse gases is actually to be applauded; our planet has a nice little insulating layer that has been a boon for life. However, these atmospheric gases are central players in a story of too much of a good thing. Aside from CO₂ and CH₄, the other main greenhouse gases include nitrous oxide and a group of fluorinated gases. With no regard for political affiliation or religious beliefs, these molecules wend their way through various planetary processes, including a stint in the atmosphere where they absorb radiation (i.e., radiative forcing). …

The student and climate activist, Greta Thunberg, has pointedly avoided air travel, most recently accompanying a sailboat crew in a trip across the Atlantic Ocean to be received in New York City for the United Nations Climate Action Summit. Celebrities and high profile personalities have recently received criticism for jetting to destinations to discuss, of all things, the climate crisis. Climate deniers often use the tactic of pointing out how the former US Vice President and defacto climate advocate Al Gore, and climate scientists, fly by plane — as an apparent example of hypocrisy regarding the truth and urgency of climate change. Movements have sprung up to sow the seeds of flight shame, or flygskam in Swedish. So why the focus on air travel? …
We’ve reached a pivotal teaching moment as American economic, political and social conflict have become inseparable from global environmental concerns and crises. The state of our environment is a reflection of our national character: our struggles with greed, disinformation, intolerance, and injustice are reflected in imbalance, pollution, degradation and loss in the natural world. Modern society, however, is often either physically removed from nature or emotionally and mentally disconnected from the concept that the environment defines us and is defined by us. The seed for this disconnect between the internal and external environment was planted long ago.
Since its beginnings as a white settler frontier, the US has been personified and perceived as a vast fount of God’s plenty, a veritable cornucopia of bounty for the taking, unencumbered with the entrenched restrictions related to land ownership in Europe. At the onset of our Euro-centric history, our frontier did appear endless and bountiful in a literal sense. Unmapped territories extended from sea to shining sea with spectacular natural bounty, reflected in enormous roaming herds of bison, fruitful prairies, pristine rivers and lakes, and purple mountain majesties. …
The state of New York recently passed what could be considered a game changer in the evolving world of carbon reduction policies, joining the climate action bench with California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico and Washington. There have been many landmarks along the road leading to these local and state-level climate commitments. Most notably was the Trump Administration’s move in 2017 to remove the US from the (non-binding) Paris Agreement; under the Agreement, President Obama had pledged to reduce carbon emissions in the US by up to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. Technically, President Trump hasn’t actually removed the US; rather he made a politically-motivated statement of non-commitment. That statement carries weight: the US is doing little to nothing at the federal level to achieve the goals we had set as a nation for reducing our carbon emissions. Strike that: if anything, our current federal motivation is to move backwards in regards to national responsibility, as well as environmental protections in general. …