Jill Lepore on Microhistory

Darren Mueller
Jul 24, 2017 · 1 min read

Proposition 1: If biography is largely founded on a belief in the singularity and significance of an individual’s contribution to history, microhistory is founded upon almost the opposite assumption: however singular a person’s life may be, the value of examining it lies in how it serves as an allegory for the culture as a whole.

Proposition 2: Biographers seek to profile an individual and recapitulate a life story, but microhistorians, tracing their elusive characters through slender records, tend to address themselves to solving small mysteries about a person’s life as a means to exploring the culture.

Proposition 3: Biographers generally worry about becoming too intimate with their subjects and later betraying them; microhistorians, typically denied any such intimacy, tend to betray people who have left abundant records in order to resurrect those who did not.

Proposition 4: A biographer’s alter ego is usually the subject of the biography, while a microhistorian’s alter ego maybe a figure who investigates or judges the subject. For this reason, a microhistorian may be a charter in his own book.

… AND

Microhistory will always draw the writer’s and the reader’s attention away from the subject and toward the culture.

-Jill Lepore, “Historians who love too much: Reflections on microhistory and biography,The Journal of American History 88:1 (June 2001), 141.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade