This essay is full of the usual might/possibly/suggested/predicted/maybe/very likely sentences. Yet again, there’s no empirical proof of the oft-predicted catastrophic AGW. It’s just scare-mongering.
The money quote is the admission that CO2 has been higher in the past before we were around. However, the writers neglect to admit that the earth didn’t burn to a crisp and the seas didn’t boil when CO2 was at those higher levels:
“It is indeed true that CO2 concentrations in previous eras have been much higher than today, but not at a time when humans, and most other currently present species, were also on the Earth.”
BTW I wouldn’t rely so heavily on the characters who write things at Skeptical Science. Follow this link to see what I mean: