Leonardo de Vinci rendered semen coming from the spine in his 1493 drawing, “The Copulation”

a history of semen

David Titterington
Jul 10, 2017 · 7 min read

part 1: wet dreams

Wet. Some guys have multiple wet dreams a week if they stop masturbating, but most guys I know never have wet dreams. They have erotic dreams, sure, but they don’t actually ejaculate in bed because they masturbate and have plenty of sex in their waking lives. Most boys growing up are already masturbating, so they don’t have the big “nocturnal emission” they were told they would have in Sex Education class. But we waited for it. Some of us feared it, because that’s when our parents would find out about our dream sex life. In a way, the wet dream even betrayed a sort of virginity loss, because dreams are real when you are in them.

In a bit of irony, the men in history who did have wet dreams, lots of them, were the celibate monks and erotiphobic Christians, especially the great church fathers of western civilization. Sex, masturbating, ejaculating, and wet dreams were all outlawed in monasteries, so the presence of semen in the morning caused great anxiety in these men. They could keep their spilled semen a secret from their brothers, but not from God. It was a sign of profound failure and obsession, as we read again and again in their private confessions. Why all the fuss? It’s partly because, as far as they knew, Adam’s legendary first wife, Lilith, was likely taking the spilled, sentient “soul seed” down into hell to create demons.

What’s important to remember is that for these early Christians, as for most premodern peoples, semen wasn’t just a slimy sexual substance that appeared after intense physical bliss. As soon as it was discovered as the nessisaru ‘seed,’ semen was imagined as the individual’s soul. It was considered the living thing, the pure soul of the person, or in some theological debates it was designated a material support for the soul and the body. The Abrahamic traditions express this view, as well as a number of others, and it wasn’t just a patriarchal, male-centered imagination that turned semen divine. The materiality of it — its oily, pearly shininess — was a testament to its divinity, and a tiny drop was believed to be spread all throughout the body, sustaining and animating it. We find this idea living and manipulating bodies all over the world, and we can see it motivate cultural behaviors like gender roles, and I argue, we can see this overvalueing of semen integral to rape culture.

To be clear, female bodies also had this drop of semen keeping them alive (Galen even described ovaries as female testicles), but they didn’t have a storehouse of it. Female bodies’ ‘essence,’ or refined spirit, was milk, a mere food. The male body, on the other hand, like God the Father's body, was able to produce and support eternal souls.

Before modern medicine placed the production of semen in the testicles, it was believed to originate in the head, like some kind of condensed pure consciousness (or in some cases it was like the final, refined, and fermented product of digestion). Then, in men, it traveled down the spinal column and out the penis. Plato characterized semen as “a soft flow from the spine”, and Leonardo de Vinci rendered semen coming from the spine in his 1493 drawing, “The Copulation,” (which is weird because he supposedly had the cadaver right in front of him, but his eyes must have been clouded by his culture). Our thoughts were then believed to affect the quality of this “spirit oil,” and what you were thinking at the moment of orgasm affected the life of your offspring. Its whiteness also related it to bone marrow and to the eyeballs, which contributed to the idea that leaking semen would lead to a weak spine and to blindness.

As Michel Foucault summarizes it in his History of Sexuality (1990: 130), “by expelling their semen, living creatures…deprived themselves of elements that were valuable for their own existence.” This is one reason why eating “liquid soul” was an early Christian ritual. Semen became the Eucharist and Host of the body. If it’s eaten then it’s not wasted! Perhaps they took The Gospel of Eve literally, which says to “gather your seeds” and to not waste them. Some of these Christians believed Jesus was the first to show us, at the Last Supper, how to consume his soul through oral sex. “This body-blood is my soul. Eat it so that I may live in you forever.” We know about these early Christian beliefs because they were described in detail by Iranius and Epiphanius, the Church Fathers bent on exposing heretical Christians.

Early Christians were not the only groups to ensoul semen and to develop semen-eating rituals around the idea of maintaining an unbroken lineage to a certain person’s mind. Buddhists were doing it, too. And I just want to be clear that this idea is of course incredibly sexist. Because only men create semen (which is why it’s also a symbol for strength and masculinity), are women just considered soulless? Yeah, pretty much. And as far as procreation goes, men were believed to contribute the “white parts” — the eyes, bones, teeth, marrow, and pure white light of the soul, whereas women contributed “the red parts” — the soft flesh, organs, skin, and blood. Without microscopes, can we blame premodern people all over the world for believing this?

However sexist, the conflation of semen with the soul and with the other ‘pearly whites’ of the body created serious anxiety in men: leaking this stuff could be deadly, or even worse: emasculating.

Wet dreams were serious and dangerous occasions. The male body’s inability to contain itself despite a conscious intention to not leak led to surgical treatments such as cauterization and the infamous “spermatorrhea ring” one could order for a dollar fifty, that cuts into the penis when it swells in arousal.

The cited and longer version of this introduction can be seen here.

References

Abbot, Elizebeth 2001. A History of Celibacy. Da Capo Press.

Atler, Joseph 1992. The Wrestler’s Body: Identity and Ideology in North India.University of California Press. Los Angeles.

Atreya, Shanti Prakash. 1973. “Brahmacharya”. Bharatiya Kushti 11, no. 1, 2, 3: 21–30.

David, Biale .1997. Eros and the Jews: From Biblical Israel to Contemporary America. University of California Press, Berkeley.

2007. Blood and Belief: The circulation of a Symbol between Jews and Christians. University of California Press; Berkeley.

Brakke, David. “The Problematization of Nocturnal Emissions in early Christian Syria, Egypt, and Gaul,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 3.4 (1995): 419–60

Brown, Peter. 1988. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press)

Cassian, John, 1997. John Cassian: The Conferences. Newman Press. New Jersey.

Edwards, James. 1983 “Semen Anxiety in South Asian Cultures: Cultural and Transcultural Significance.” Medical Anthropology, Summer: 51–67.

Elliott, D. 1999. Fallen bodies: pollution, sexuality, and demonology in the Middle Ages, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Foucault, M. 1990. The use of Pleasure. Vintage Books.

Galen (1992) De semeni (on semen)

Graves, Robert; Patai, Raphael . 1966. Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis,McGraw-Hill: New York.

Grosz, E 1994, Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Herdt, Gilbert 2003. Secrecy and Cultural Reality: Utopian Ideologies of the New Guinea Men’s House. University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor.

Holliday, Ruth, Hassard, John (ed), 2001. Contested Bodies. Routledge: New York.

Houtmand, Dick; Meyer, Birgit, (ed) 2012. Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality, Fordham University Press.

Kakar, Sudir 1982. Shamans, Mystics and Doctors. New Delhi: Oxford University Press

Lallemand, M. 1866. A Practical Treaties on the Causes, symptoms and treatment of Spermatorrhea. Henry C. Lea, Sherman and Co. Printers.

Loughlin, Gerald et al. 2007. Queer Theology: Rethinking the Western Body. Blackwell.

Magid, Shaul 2008. From Metaphysics to Midrash: Myth, History, and the interpretation of scripture in Lurianic Kabbala. Indiana University Press: Bloomington.

Mason, Michael. 1994. The Making of Victorian Sexuality. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Mastrocinque, Attilio. 2005. From Jewish Magic to Gnosticism. Mohr. Siebeck, Germany.

McDonald, Heather. 2001. Blood, Bones and Spirit: Aboriginal Christianity in an East Kimberley Town. Melbourne University Press: Victoria.

Moore, Lisa: 2007. Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid. New York University Press, New York.

Nelson, James. 1988. The Intimate Connection: Male Sexuality, Masculine Spirituality. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

Powers, John. 2009. A Bull of a Man: Images of Masculinty, Sex, and the Body in Indian Buddhism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Rosenman, Ellen, 2003 “Body Doubles: The Spermatoreahea Panic” Journal of the History of Sexuality 12.3 (2003) 365–399

2003b. Unauthorized Pleasures: Accounts of Victorian Erotic Experience. Cornell University Press.

Rosemberg, David 2000. Dreams of Being Eaten Alive: The Literary Core of the Kabbalah. Harmony Books.

Sauerteig, Lutz; Davidson, Roger. 2009. Shaping Sexual Knowledge: A Cultural History of Sex Education in Twentieth Century Europe. Routledge: London.

Sha, Teresa. 1998. The Burden of the Flesh: Fasting and Sexuality in Early Christianity. Augsburg Fortress, Minneapolis.

Srivastava, Sanjay (ed) 2004. Sexual Sites, Seminal Attitudes: Sexualities, Masculnities and Culture in South Asia. Sage Publications, New Delhi.

Williams, Michael Allen. 1996. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An argument for dismantling a dubious Category, Princeton University Press: New Jersey.

David Titterington

Written by

Painter and Art Instructor at Haskell Indian Nations University