There are some parts where you sound rational, but you only serve to undercut your arguments and undermine your credibility when you characterize the gun control argument for universal background checks (something that 90% of Americans agree on — clearly, you’re in the 10% that don’t) as peddling extreme fear. Seriously? Then you go off on the standard NRA and gun violence denial argument line about how criminals don’t obey laws and therefore we don’t need laws. Again, seriously? Our fear (on the gun-control side) is based on REAL statistics and mass shootings and innocent children dying every day at the hands of NON-CRIMINALS — what the f is your fear based on other than NRA’s rantings about the “government coming for your guns”???

Here’s how much of a nut-job you are — you say unequivocally that 50 states should allow concealed carry (asserting YOUR point abt the 2nd amendment) but you are OPPOSED to universal background checks citing a LACK OF DATA (no data — so why bother with the law?) — THAT’S your argument for not having a law in place — because “it won’t work anyway” — so why are you opposed to TRYING IT?????? Ughhh I started writing this seeing some elements of rationality in your response but by the time I’m done, I realize you’re just another gun nut trying to sound concerned and failing miserably. Never mind.