A proposal for storing small balances in snapshots
Werner der Champ
3892

Interesting problem!

What would this mean for the transaction history on a given node?

Consider the following scenario:

- Regular transaction X directly approves nano transaction Y and regular transaction Z

- Node A disregards small transaction Y due to small balance of the resulting address.

- Transaction X now only approves transaction Z on Node A, and no longer meets the the protocol rules of a valid transaction (approving 2 transactions)

Could this lead to a snowball of regular transactions becoming invalid because of the disregarding of a single nano transaction?