I like the new credit idea but I don’t think it’s a solution.
Constantinos Xenophontos
1

I don’t follow your objection. There is no quantitative value given to any contribution. Sure, the journal could also just count up the number of contributions an author has made per paper, but this is obviously incorrect since most people have subjective opinions of which contributions are more important. I also see no incentive for any journal to do this.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.