Your Gleeful Liberal Takedown of Hillary Clinton Is Affirming Institutional Sexism

What a ridiculous notion. You might have a point if Clinton wasn’t actually a total fraud that abused her power as Secretary of State to take bribes from defense contractors and foreign militants in exchange for arranging arms contracts between them. You might have a point if her flagrant disregard for her duties hadn’t caused atrocious humanitarian crises that have displaced millions of people. You might have a point if her entire political career wasn’t shrouded in the secrecy of the “natural politician” she has the gall to claim she isn’t, despite decades of her and her husband throwing Americans under the bus to promote the interests of the rich and powerful. But you don’t.

Are there people who dislike her solely because she’s a woman? Of course there are. But to suggest that sexism has anything to do with the electorate refusing to be strung along by another lying snake of a politician is absurd, and nothing but a cheap ploy trotted out by the establishment media in a desperate attempt to preserve their failing enterprise.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.