Dmitriy
Dmitriy
Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read

That “manifesto” is first and foremost questioning professional qualifications of a big group of Google’s engineers “because biology”.

I read it more “because iron booted policy of conformance”.

Taking something not directed at you personally as a personal offense, is not really a toxic working environment. Being told to shut up and toe the line, getting passed for promotion because now they have quotas to fill — however is toxic.

Personally I don’t even understand why. Most successful companies Google, Apple, Facebook were made so while not conforming to diversity quotas, doesn’t it say that you don’t need these quotas to be successful? And an example of GM and Yahoo, that this is wrong to force it?

    Dmitriy

    Written by

    Dmitriy