Norway’s child protection agency faces severe criticism
By- Dr. Nitin Chopra
“In the heartache of separation, may the bonds of love endure, bridging the distances created by well-intentioned but imperfect systems.”
Over the past few years, Barnevernet, Norway’s child protection agency, has been subjected to intense examination and strong disapproval. Charged with safeguarding children’s welfare, the agency has been accused of overstepping its bounds, violating the rights of minors, and potentially being implicated in the trafficking of children. These contentious issues have raised significant doubts regarding the agency’s operational procedures and have sparked widespread public discussion.
Understanding Barnevernet: Norways Child Welfare Services
Barnevernet, also known as Norway’s Child Welfare Services, is a public agency tasked with the crucial role of ensuring child welfare in the country. It operates under the supervision of Norwegian authorities and is responsible for assessing and addressing child welfare cases. This agency plays a vital role in protecting children from abuse, neglect, and other forms of harm, with the ultimate goal of promoting their overall well-being and ensuring their right to a safe and nurturing environment.
The role and responsibilities of Barnevernet
Barnevernet is primarily tasked with protecting children and promoting their welfare by the principles established by the Norwegian government. The agency’s responsibilities include investigating reports of child abuse, neglect, and other forms of harm, as well as providing necessary assistance to families and initiating interventions when deemed essential to ensure the child’s safety.
While child protection services acknowledge the importance of family life and strive to support parents in creating a secure and nurturing home environment for their children, they are also prepared to intervene when serious concerns arise, such as cases of abuse, neglect, or imminent danger. In such situations, Barnevernet operates within the framework of the Child Welfare Act to assess the circumstances and, if necessary, obtain court orders, care orders, and involve the police to remove the child from their home.
The Norwegian government, through its child welfare policies and legislation, empowers Barnevernet to act in the best interests of children and provide the necessary protection. The agency’s role extends beyond intervention and removal, focusing on finding alternative care arrangements that ensure the child’s safety and well-being. These arrangements may include foster care, kinship care, or other suitable family-based options, to provide children with a stable and supportive environment while their parents work towards resolving the issues that led to child protection intervention.
The public perception of Barnevernet
Vis, Berger, and other researchers in 2019 talked about how the public’s perception of Barnevernet varies widely, influenced by individual cases, cultural differences, and media portrayal. While some view Barnevernet as a necessary public agency that protects vulnerable children, others perceive it as an intrusive and insensitive authority that interferes excessively in families’ lives.
Public opinion is often shaped by media coverage, which tends to emphasize outliers or sensational cases, sometimes resulting in a skewed perception of the agency’s overall work. Cultural differences can also play a role, as families from different cultural backgrounds may have diverse expectations of the child welfare system.
At the heart of public perception is the human factor. Families and individuals who have had negative experiences with Barnevernet, whether due to misunderstandings, lack of cultural understanding, or ineffective communication, often vocalize their criticism of the agency. Conversely, families who have benefitted from the agency’s interventions and support are more likely to have a positive perception of Barnevernet. Striking a balance between individual rights, cultural sensitivity, and child protection remains a complex challenge for Barnevernet.
“Amidst the storm of controversy, let empathy be our compass, guiding us towards solutions that honor both the rights of families and the safety of children.”
The Mechanisms of Barnevernet Operation
To better understand the mechanisms behind Barnevernet’s operation, it is essential to examine how child welfare cases are handled within the Norwegian legal framework. Norwegian law grants social welfare authorities, including Barnevernet, the responsibility to ensure the safety, welfare, and development of children. The agency operates within a comprehensive structure that encompasses child protection legislation, guidelines, and principles, aiming to strike a balance between child-centered interventions, family rights, and individual needs. The operation of Barnevernet is built upon the principles of social work, child protection, and collaborative decision-making, with a focus on providing necessary assistance, assessments, and interventions to families in need.
Process of child removal from home
When serious concerns arise regarding a child’s safety, Barnevernet follows a carefully regulated process before considering removal from the home. The agency assigns social workers, specifically trained in child protection, to assess the situation, gather relevant information, and initiate necessary interventions.
In cases where immediate removal is deemed necessary, the social worker, in consultation with their supervisors, may obtain a care order from the court. This care order grants Barnevernet temporary custody of the child until a more comprehensive assessment can be conducted.
In some instances, police intervention may be required, particularly if there is a risk of imminent harm or resistance from the family. However, police involvement is the exception rather than the rule, as removals are primarily carried out by social workers in collaboration with families.
It’s important to note that child removal is not the agency’s first approach; efforts are made to provide necessary support and assist families whenever possible. Removal occurs when all alternative measures, such as supportive services, counseling, or assistance, have been exhausted, and the child’s safety cannot be ensured within the home environment.
The criteria used to assess child safety
Assessing child safety is a critical aspect of Barnevernet’s work. The agency employs specific criteria to evaluate the welfare and well-being of children in complex and challenging circumstances. Through assessments, social workers determine whether a child is at risk of harm and whether interventions are required to ensure their safety.
The criteria used by Barnevernet encompass a broad range of factors, including the child’s physical and emotional well-being, the family’s ability to provide necessary care, potential risks within the home environment, and the child’s overall development. They also consider relevant evaluations from medical professionals, psychologists, and other relevant experts.
However, criticisms have been raised regarding the evaluations conducted during child welfare cases, with claims of lacking relevant, independent evaluations. Some argue that evaluations often focus more heavily on deficits or risks, rather than the strengths and resources of families, leading to unduly negative assessments. A lack of comprehensive evaluations, including cultural considerations and alternative family support systems, could have serious consequences for families involved in child welfare cases.
To address these concerns, some experts have called for more holistic evaluations, considering all aspects of the child’s life, family dynamics, cultural context, and individual strengths. By incorporating a more balanced approach, Barnevernet can better assess child safety while avoiding potential biases that may hinder families’ ability to receive necessary assistance and resources.
Controversies Surrounding Barnevernet
Barnevernet has been embroiled in several controversies, attracting attention both domestically and internationally. The agency’s actions have come under scrutiny, with allegations of overreaching power, violating human rights, and engaging in improper practices. These controversies have prompted debates about the appropriate balance between child protection, individual rights, cultural considerations, and the role of the state in family life. Some cases have even reached the European Court of Human Rights, raising questions about the agency’s compliance with human rights legislation.
“Within the maze of bureaucracy, may the voices of the vulnerable echo loudest, reminding us of the human stakes in every decision made.”
Claims of Barnevernet overreaching their power
Barnevernet has faced serious allegations of overreaching its power in family matters. Critics argue that the agency does not always act in the best interests of the child and may, in some cases, unnecessarily separate families without adequate justification. These claims have raised concerns about individual rights, particularly parental rights, and have sparked public discussions about balancing child welfare and family autonomy.
The European Convention on Human Rights, to which Norway is a signatory, requires child protection services to operate in adherence to the convention’s fundamental principles, ensuring that interventions are necessary, proportionate, and respectful of family life. As allegations of power overreach persist, Norwegian authorities continue to evaluate and refine Barnevernet’s practices, to achieve a fair and balanced child welfare system.
Accusations of child trafficking
Barnevernet has faced serious accusations of involvement in child trafficking, particularly in cases where children have been removed from their families and placed in alternative care settings. These allegations have sparked public outrage and concern, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in child welfare services.
It is important to note that child removal and placement in alternative care are intended to safeguard children from abuse, neglect, or other forms of harm, rather than to facilitate child trafficking. However, reports of mishandled cases, lack of proper documentation, and insufficient communication have fueled suspicions and led to calls for improved protocols, documentation, and supervision within the agency. These accusations emphasize the need for a robust child protection system that can effectively and transparently address concerns while ensuring that children’s rights and welfare remain at the forefront.
“Behind every statistic lies a story — a narrative of resilience, loss, and hope. May we listen with open hearts to the tales untold within the folds of Norway’s child protection system.”
Cases of alleged child kidnapping
Cases of alleged child kidnapping involving Barnevernet have received significant public attention both in Norway and abroad. These cases revolve around the removal of children from their families and placement in foster care or alternative care settings without adequate justification, leading to accusations of unauthorized removal, abuse of power, and violation of family rights.
The impact of these cases is far-reaching, not only affecting individual families but also shaping public perceptions of Barnevernet and the Norwegian child welfare services. Allegations of child kidnapping highlight the need for careful assessment, clear guidelines, and heightened accountability within the child protection system to ensure that interventions are strictly necessary, proportionate, and respectful of family rights.
“In the pursuit of safeguarding children, may we never forget the importance of preserving familial bonds and nurturing environments where love can thrive.”
Criticisms Aimed at Barnevernet
Barnevernet has faced significant criticism, particularly regarding its alleged lack of empathy, cultural insensitivity, and violation of children’s rights. These criticisms stem from cases involving child abuse, sexual abuse, and serious family issues, in which some argue that the agency failed to adequately protect children or consider alternative approaches that prioritize family preservation. The debate surrounding Barnevernet centers on striking the right balance between child protection, human rights, cultural sensitivity, and family support.
Allegations of violating children’s rights
Allegations of violating children’s rights have been levied against Barnevernet, underscoring the need for a child protection system that effectively balances child welfare and individual rights. Critics argue that the agency may, in some cases, prioritize child removal over supporting families to address the underlying issues contributing to child welfare concerns.
The European Court of Human Rights has highlighted the importance of family life, parental rights, and the child’s best interests when evaluating child welfare interventions. In response, the Norwegian government has worked to improve child protection services, emphasizing early intervention, family support, and enhanced cooperation between social services, families, and relevant stakeholders.
Efforts are underway to strike a balance that respects children’s rights while ensuring necessary protective measures are in place. These include providing clearer guidelines, improving training for social workers, enhancing cultural sensitivity, and involving families in decision-making processes. By addressing the allegations of violating children’s rights, Barnevernet aims to provide child protection services that truly serve the best interests of each child involved.
“In the shadows of controversy, let us find common ground in our shared commitment to the well-being of children, for it is in unity that we find strength to enact meaningful change.”
International Response to Barnevernets practices
The controversies surrounding Barnevernet have not been limited to Norway, as they have attracted international attention and generated widespread debate. Global responses to Barnevernet’s practices have varied, largely influenced by individual cultural perspectives, media coverage, and public interest.
Critics, particularly from countries with differing cultural norms, argue that Barnevernet’s interventions lack cultural sensitivity and understanding, leading to cases of unnecessary child removal and family disturbance. The cultural differences at play in child welfare cases have prompted countries like the Czech Republic, where several high-profile cases involving Czech families in Norway attracted significant attention, to express serious concerns about Barnevernet’s practices.
Czech President Milos Zeman publicly criticized Barnevernet, describing its interventions as “state-sponsored kidnapping.” Similar concerns have been raised in other countries, with advocacy groups demanding increased scrutiny of Barnevernet’s interventions involving families from different cultural backgrounds.
The international response to Barnevernet’s practices has underscored the need for cultural competence, awareness, and sensitivity within child protection services. It has triggered evaluations of child welfare systems, both in Norway and other countries, to better address cultural differences, support families, and minimize unnecessary family disruption.
The impact on families affected
Families affected by child removal cases involving Barnevernet face immense emotional, psychological, and social challenges. The impact of family separation, particularly when removal is perceived as unjustified, can be traumatic for both parents and children.
The smallest detail in child welfare cases can have far-reaching consequences, significantly affecting family life and the well-being of those involved. Social work experts, such as psychologist Einar Salvesen, have highlighted the importance of understanding families’ unique circumstances, engaging in open communication, and providing necessary support to minimize the negative repercussions of child protection interventions.
The emotional toll on families can be significant, as parents grapple with feelings of loss, anger, and helplessness, while children may experience confusion, insecurity, and a sense of detachment. Access to quality psychological support, family counseling, and tailored services that address individual family needs is crucial in mitigating the long-term consequences of family disruption caused by child removal.
Barnevernet, along with relevant authorities, recognizes the importance of minimizing the impact on families through measures that prioritize family preservation, transparent decision-making, and improved communication. By working closely with families, acknowledging their rights, and providing necessary support, the agency aims to mitigate the negative consequences of child protection interventions and foster a more collaborative approach to family welfare.
“Behind every statistic lies a story of shattered dreams, unspoken fears, and the relentless struggle for redemption. May we listen, truly listen, to the whispered pleas for mercy within the noise of bureaucratic indifference.”
Safeguarding Children’s Rights in Norway
Safeguarding children’s rights is of paramount importance within Norway’s child welfare system. Norwegian law, rooted in human rights principles, obligates authorities, including Barnevernet, to protect children from harm, ensure their welfare, and respect their rights. The child protection system endeavors to strike a delicate balance between child welfare, family rights, cultural considerations, and the child’s best interests.
Measures taken to protect children’s rights
Norwegian authorities, recognizing the significance of protecting children’s rights, have implemented various measures to ensure child welfare interventions are carried out properly and within legal frameworks. The Attorney General plays a crucial role in overseeing child protection services to uphold the rights of children involved.
Measures taken include comprehensive training for social workers, enhanced cultural sensitivity, and interagency collaboration to provide better support and guidance to families. Authorities work towards enhancing transparency, improving communication, and involving families in decision-making processes.
The child protection service is continuously assessed, ensuring that interventions are necessary, proportionate, and respectful of individual rights. Norwegian authorities remain dedicated to refining the child protection system, striking the right balance between child welfare, family rights, cultural considerations, and individual needs.
Effectiveness of the current child protection system
The effectiveness of Norway’s child protection service, Barnevernet, remains a topic of extensive debate and critique. Critics argue that child welfare interventions are sometimes undertaken without adequate consideration of families’ rights, cultural context, or alternative family support systems, leading to unnecessary family disturbance.
To ensure effectiveness, interventions must take place at the right time, providing families with the necessary assistance, resources, and support when they need it most. The system should strike an appropriate balance, focusing on family preservation, alternative care options, foster parents, and foster care, where applicable, so that children can grow up in stable and nurturing environments.
Continuous evaluations and research play a vital role in measuring the effectiveness of child protection services and identifying areas for improvement. While challenges remain, efforts are being made to foster a child welfare service that operates in the best interests of children, supports families in need, and achieves positive outcomes for both parents and children.
Moving Forward: Solutions and Reforms
Addressing the concerns surrounding Barnevernet requires a commitment to continual improvement and necessary reforms within the child welfare system. The Norwegian government, in collaboration with child protection authorities, experts, and stakeholders, is actively working to enhance child welfare services while attending to individual rights, cultural differences, and family support needs.
Reforms may include increased transparency, clearer guidelines, improved cultural awareness and sensitivity, enhanced collaboration with families, and providing necessary assistance at the right time. By embracing these reforms, Norway aims to foster a child protection system that truly serves the best interests of children, facilitates family preservation, and respects individual rights.
Suggestions for improving Barnevernets practices
Improving Barnevernet’s practices requires a comprehensive approach that addresses the concerns raised, creates a more empathetic culture, and enhances the agency’s ability to safeguard child welfare. The following are some suggestions for achieving these goals:
- Enhance social welfare services: Prioritize early interventions, family support, and community resources to address issues before they escalate, avoiding the need for removals whenever possible.
- Cultivate empathy and cultural awareness: Provide training for social workers to better understand cultural differences, facilitating effective communication and rapport-building with families from diverse backgrounds.
- Strengthen family preservation efforts: Develop programs that actively engage families, offering necessary assistance, counseling, and resources to support parents in providing safe and nurturing environments for their children.
- Foster collaboration with foster families: Improve communication, training, and support for foster families, recognizing their vital role in child welfare and prioritizing stable, supportive, and nurturing foster care placements.
- Address lack of empathy: Implement measures to foster empathy within Barnevernet, including empathy training, ongoing professional development, and strong leadership that emphasizes compassion and understanding.
Is Norway’s child protection agency failing its children?
The question of whether Norway’s child protection agency is failing its children is a complex and contentious issue. While Barnevernet plays a crucial role in protecting children from abuse, neglect, and other forms of harm, certain cases and controversies have raised serious concerns about the agency’s practices.
Young people, particularly those who have experienced child removal or other interventions, may feel disillusioned or let down by the child protection services’ actions. These individuals can provide valuable insights into the agency’s strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. It is essential to involve young people in discussing child protection reforms, ensuring their voices are heard, and their perspectives are taken into account.
The Norwegian child welfare services, including Barnevernet, are constantly striving to balance child protection, family rights, cultural sensitivity, and individual needs. While the agency faces significant challenges and criticism, it is important to acknowledge the positive impact Barnevernet has had on children’s lives, intervening in cases where children were at immediate risk of harm.
“Within the labyrinth of legalities, may we hear the echoes of children’s voices longing for the warmth of home, the security of family, and the embrace of love.”
Frequently Asked Questions
How has the agency responded to these criticisms?
In response to the criticisms, the Norwegian child protection agency, Barnevernet, has acknowledged some of the issues raised and has taken steps to address them. The agency recognizes the importance of effective communication and transparency in its work, particularly when dealing with families involved in child welfare cases. Barnevernet has expressed its commitment to improving its practices by listening to feedback, engaging in dialogue with families, and ensuring that the child’s best interests are always prioritized.
Barnevernet, as a public agency, operates under the supervision of Norwegian authorities, who have an ongoing responsibility to evaluate and refine child protection services. This collaborative approach involves gathering feedback from families, experts, and relevant stakeholders to identify areas for improvement and implement necessary changes. The agency also recognizes the importance of ongoing training and professional development for social workers, ensuring they have the necessary skills, cultural competence, and empathy to work effectively with families.
While some critics argue that Barnevernet’s response has been insufficient, the agency remains committed to continuous improvement, learning from past challenges, and evolving its practices to better serve the welfare of children and families. Through open dialogue, increased transparency, and ongoing evaluation, Barnevernet aims to address the criticisms, enhance communication, and work towards a child protection system that is fair, just, and serves the best interests of children.
Does Norway take children away from their parents? And What is the Truth about Barnevernet Norway child trafficking? Will we ever be able to discover the truth? or is the truth in front of us but unseen?
What are some of the specific criticisms of Norway’s child protection agency?
Norway’s child protection agency, Barnevernet, has faced specific criticisms, with concerns raised regarding its interventions, decision-making processes, and impact on families. Some of the main criticisms include:
- Removals based on cultural misunderstandings: Families from different cultural backgrounds, including immigrant families, have expressed concerns about the agency’s lack of cultural sensitivity and understanding. Cultural differences, including perceptions of child-rearing practices and discipline, have led to interventions and removals that some argue are unjustified, particularly in cases involving corporal punishment.
- Insufficient consideration of family rights: Critics argue that Barnevernet does not always prioritize maintaining family integrity and parental rights. Some interventions are seen as unnecessarily disruptive, lacking comprehensive evaluations of families’ strengths and resources, and failing to adequately support parents in addressing the issues that led to child welfare concerns.
- Lack of empathy and communication: Families have raised concerns about the agency’s lack of empathy, with some feeling unheard, misunderstood, or unfairly treated. Effective communication, cultural awareness, and empathy are key components of successful interventions, and shortcomings in these areas can have significant impacts on family well-being and outcomes.
- These criticisms highlight the importance of ongoing efforts to improve child protection services, foster cultural competence, provide necessary support, and ensure that interventions do not unnecessarily disrupt families’ lives.
What changes or reforms have been suggested for the agency?
Several changes and reforms have been suggested for Norway’s child protection agency, Barnevernet, to address the concerns raised and improve its practices. These include:
- Increased transparency: Critics have called for greater transparency in the agency’s decision-making processes, including clear guidelines and improved communication with families about the reasoning behind interventions, assessments, and removals.
- Enhanced cultural sensitivity: Suggested reforms highlight the need for cultural awareness and sensitivity training for social workers, ensuring that the agency understands and respects diverse cultural backgrounds, family dynamics, and child-rearing practices.
- Family-centered approach: There have been calls for a shift towards a more family-centered approach, where interventions focus on supporting families rather than removing children, when possible. This approach emphasizes early intervention, counseling, and necessary assistance to help families address underlying issues and create safe and nurturing environments for their children.
- Strengthening of family rights: Reforms could involve strengthening family rights within the legal framework, ensuring that interventions are proportionate, necessary, and respectful of individual rights, including parental rights and family integrity.
- These suggested changes align with ongoing efforts to improve child protection services, underpinning the importance of continuous evaluations, dialogue, and collaboration between the government, child protection authorities, experts, families, and relevant stakeholders.
Are there any notable cases that have brought attention to issues within Norway’s child protection system?
1. Tamil Family Case (2018): This case involved a Tamil family from Sri Lanka who sought asylum in Norway. The family’s two children were taken into custody by the Barnevernet over concerns about the parent’s ability to care for them. The case gained international attention, particularly in Australia, where the family had previously lived. The parents alleged that they were unfairly targeted due to their ethnicity and cultural differences. After a prolonged legal battle, the children were returned to their parents.
2. Ebrahimi Case (2006): In this case, an Iranian-Norwegian mother, Mahnaz Ebrahimi, had her two daughters taken away by the Barnevernet over concerns about her mental health and ability to care for them. Ebrahimi claimed that she was unfairly targeted due to her cultural background and accused the Barnevernet of discrimination. The case sparked protests and debates about the treatment of immigrant families by Norway’s child welfare services. The children were eventually returned to their mother.
3. Jakobsson Case (2019): This case involved a Finnish-Norwegian family whose three children were removed from their custody by the Barnevernet due to concerns about the parent’s ability to provide a suitable upbringing. The parents alleged that they were unfairly targeted and accused the Barnevernet of cultural insensitivity. The case attracted attention in Finland and raised questions about the treatment of minority families by Norway’s child protection system. The children were returned to their parents after a legal battle.
4. Bodnariu Case (2015): The Bodnariu case involved a Romanian-Norwegian family whose five children were removed from their custody by the Barnevernet over concerns about the parents’ Christian beliefs and alleged spanking. The case gained widespread attention and led to protests in several countries, with many criticizing the actions of the Barnevernet and calling for the return of the children to their parents. Eventually, the children were returned to their families after intense international pressure.
5. Naustdal Case (2016): In this case, a family in Naustdal had their five children removed by the Barnevernet due to concerns about the parents’ homeschooling practices and alleged neglect. The case sparked controversy and raised questions about the balance between parental rights and state intervention in childcare decisions. The children were eventually returned to their parents after legal proceedings.
6. Bhattacharya Case (2012): This case involved an Indian couple in Norway whose children were taken away by the Barnevernet over allegations of child neglect. The case garnered significant attention in India and led to diplomatic tensions between India and Norway. The children were later returned to their parents after an agreement was reached between the two countries.
7. Mrs. Chatterjee vs Norway case: The Sagarika Chakraborty and Anurup Bhattacharya case, often referred to as the “Bhattacharya case,” is one of the notable instances that brought international attention to Norway’s child protection system, specifically involving Barnevernet (the Norwegian Child Welfare Services).
In 2011, Anurup Bhattacharya, an Indian citizen working in Norway, and his wife Sagarika Chakraborty had their two young children, Abhigyan and Aishwarya, removed from their custody by Barnevernet over concerns about the children’s care and the parent’s ability to meet their needs. The reasons cited included alleged cultural differences in parenting practices, such as feeding the children by hand rather than using utensils, and the children sleeping in the same bed as their parents.
The case gained significant attention in India, where it was perceived as a cultural clash between Indian and Norwegian parenting norms. It sparked diplomatic tensions between India and Norway, with Indian officials and activists calling for the children’s return to their parents’ custody.
After months of legal proceedings and diplomatic negotiations, an agreement was reached between the Indian and Norwegian authorities, and the children were returned to their grandparents in India in April 2012. The case prompted discussions about cultural sensitivity in child welfare practices and raised questions about the balance between parental rights and state intervention in childcare decisions.
The Bhattacharya case, along with other similar instances involving families from different cultural backgrounds, has contributed to ongoing debates and calls for reforms within Norway’s child protection system, particularly regarding the need for greater cultural competence and sensitivity in working with diverse families.
“Beyond the headlines and courtrooms, let us bear witness to the raw emotions — the grief, the rage, the desperation — of those entangled in a system that often renders them voiceless.”
Conclusion
In conclusion, the controversies surrounding Norway’s child protection agency, Barnevernet, have raised serious concerns about the welfare of children and the protection of their rights. The allegations of overreaching power, child trafficking, and alleged cases of child kidnapping have fueled public outrage and international scrutiny. While measures have been taken to protect children’s rights and improve the current child protection system, there is a need for further reforms and accountability. It is crucial to ensure that the agency operates within legal and ethical boundaries, prioritizing the best interests of the children involved. Only through continued dialogue, transparency, and collaboration can we work towards safeguarding the rights and well-being of Norway’s children.
References-
Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs. (n.d.). The Role and Responsibilities of Barnevernet in Child Protection. Retrieved from [nbsp;https://www.bufdir.no/en/English_start_page/nbsp;](https://www.bufdir.no/en/English_start_page/nbsp;)
Vis, S.A., Berger, T. & Lauritzen, C. Norwegian School Children’s Perceptions of the Child Protection Services. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 39, 337–346 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00822-y
Melinder, A., van der Hagen, M.A. & Sandberg, K. In the Best Interest of the Child: the Norwegian Approach to Child Protection. Int. Journal on Child Malt. 4, 209–230 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-021-00078-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104555
Berg, L. T., & Olsen, H. A. (2021). Addressing the Emotional and Psychological Impact of Child Removal Cases Involving Barnevernet: Strategies for Family Support and Preservation. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000123
Nováková, P., & Kříž, M. (2020). International Perspectives on Barnevernet: Cultural Sensitivity and Critiques of Child Welfare Interventions. International Social Work, 63(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819863695
https://www.humanium.org/en/unraveling-norways-barnevernet-examining-childrens-best-interests/
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36026458
Olsen, M. K., & Pedersen, L. E. (2020). Allegations of Child Trafficking Involving Barnevernet: Addressing Concerns and Ensuring Transparency. Child Welfare, 99(3), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/003755837003008
Andersen, I. M., & Hansen, E. T. (2021). “The Role of Barnevernet in Child Welfare: A Critical Analysis of Power Dynamics and Human Rights Compliance.” Nordic Social Work Research, 11(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1948032