This story is unavailable.

Thank you for the sentiments and the questions!

Admittedly I’m overfond in my usage of “ironic air quotes” ;) which, in this case, was meant to contrast the *current* status of deep thinking as less within reach for non-elites (because of dreary economic conditions — to your point about Maslow, it’s difficult to be concerned with self-actualization when lower levels of the pyramid feel quite uncertain) with what I personally believe, which is that deep thinking should *not* be a luxury reserved for the few who don’t have to struggle over making ends meet from day to day. And regardless of current cultural and economic mores, I believe this is a basic capacity of the human mind (as corroborated by some substantive neurobiological and psychological research — most notably (and recently) for me, Daniel Kahneman’s work on “fast vs. slow thinking”).

I do think it is, historically, a widely held belief that only elites *should* be afforded this kind of open-ended time to ruminate — that it *should* be a luxury. It has been an ideology used to justify inequality for centuries. I tend to lean closer to your idea that deep/slow thinking is more like an essential right than it is like a luxury. Securing things as rights and enshrining them in law is a long and difficult struggle, however. I would love to get to the day when we have pushed far enough to have a discourse about whether or not deep thinking should be a right. At present I tend to feel that my more immediate task is in talking many of my Silicon Valley colleagues off a ledge in which the overwhelming perception is that “fast decisions are always better” and that “efficiency is the highest goal of technology.” As a predominant worldview I find it quite shocking, that otherwise highly intelligent people do not seem to be very aware of these different modes of thinking and their attendant benefits.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.