Check your U.S. voter registration status or register to vote here.

Thing is, they are not unprovoked. Nor is the DNC connection unproven (I mean, technically science would say you can’t *prove* anything — but I’ll take the agreement of the country’s top cybersecurity experts as “as close as we’re gonna get”):

A post-mortem by cyber-security firm CrowdStrike identified two separate Russian adversaries behind the attacks when the news of the intrusion first broke in early June, 2016. This has since been confirmed by other independent security firms including Fidelis, Mandiant, SecureWorks, and ThreatConnect as well as corroborated by analysis from Ars Technica and Edward Snowden (he is currently in exile there! Not liable to say that lightly).

The US intelligence community felt it had sufficient evidence to formally accuse Russia of involvement in the hacks, and are currently investigating other breaches of voter registration databases in Arizona and Illinois as well as in Florida (they are also suspected in the Podesta Emails hack, though that one has not been corroborated fully afaik). Elsewhere, there is ample evidence of Putin’s extensive disinformation campaign being waged online (including numerous experiences I have myself witnessed), which is the continuation of a long through line of wielding propaganda as a tool from the former head of the KGB (an organization he appears to be reconstituting at present).

Elsewhere the timeline of Russian aggression is pretty clear:

No one is “casual” about going to war, particularly with a nuclear superpower— I would be interested to know which comments of Clinton’s are perceived that way. It is facile to try and reduce the complexities of what is happening here as “war bad, Clinton bad, Putin good!” That is the line that Putin’s operatives are saturating the dark web with, however.

It seems to be a line that candidate Jill Stein has bought into as well — it’s fascinating how the American Green Party supports her calls for “collaboration” with the Russian dictator while Russian Greens decry it. Why the outpouring of so much concern over human rights around the world, but a blind eye to what Russia is doing to Syrian civilians (not to mention its own citizens — 20 million now in poverty up from 16 million in 2014)? It doesn’t add up — it’s a moral double standard. It is also incredibly naïve to take at face value the words of a former Soviet spy who has been Russia’s de facto ruler since 1999.

Russia is the world’s third largest oil producer — they’ve hit new output records in 2016 not seen since the mid-80s. What about this graph makes anyone think that Putin is secretly game to get serious about renewable energy?!

Image for post
Image for post

It makes no sense. Russia has no other economy beyond oil and gas (and that’s not good — especially with lower than projected oil prices). It is a cheap ploy to secure sympathy for “poor Russia” and help sway US election sentiment towards Donald Trump (or at all costs, away from Hillary Clinton — a person Putin knows will not roll over and play sycophant while Russia pursues its interests in Syria (namely securing the Tartus base for naval access to the Mediterranean) and in the Balkans.

We shouldn’t fall for it.

Written by

writer, traveler, aspiring philosopher in los angeles. (words | data | people) (ars longa | vita brevis | #YOLO)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store