Beyond the Scalpel: Why Open Surgery May Aggravate Compression Syndromes

M.E. Barbati
7 min readNov 14, 2024

When it comes to treating compression syndromes — conditions where pressure is exerted on nerves, blood vessels, or both — surgical intervention often becomes a topic of discussion. While open surgery can be an effective treatment, it is not without significant drawbacks. In many cases, the negative consequences of open surgery can outweigh the benefits, particularly when considering the potential for scarring, adhesion formation, and damage to neural and lymphatic structures. This article explores why less invasive alternatives should be considered before opting for open surgery.

Understanding Compression Syndromes

Compression syndromes occur when the normal anatomical space through which nerves or blood vessels travel is narrowed or constricted. This can lead to pain, numbness, and other debilitating symptoms. While the immediate impulse might be to relieve this pressure surgically, the decision requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits. Here are several syndromes:

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (TOS)

Description: Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (TOS) is a group of disorders that occur when the blood vessels or nerves in the space between the collarbone (clavicle) and the first rib (thoracic outlet) become compressed. This can lead to a variety of symptoms, which depend on whether nerves or blood vessels are affected. TOS is categorized into three types based on the structures compressed: Neurogenic TOS, Venous TOS, and Arterial TOS, each with distinct symptoms.

Symptoms:

  • Pain in the shoulder and neck
  • Numbness or tingling
  • Muscle wasting in the fleshy base of the thumb
  • Feeling of heaviness
  • Visible enlarged veins on the shoulder and arm
  • Weak or absent pulse in the affected arm
  • Discomfort or pain while raising the arm overhead

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS)

Description: also known as celiac artery compression syndrome, is a condition characterized by the compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament. This compression can lead to symptoms that arise from the reduced blood flow to the abdominal organs, which is exacerbated during periods when increased blood flow is necessary, such as after eating.

Symptoms:

  • Abdominal pain: Often epigastric, which can be exacerbated by eating (postprandial pain), leading to fear of eating and subsequent weight loss.
  • Nausea and vomiting: Due to the pain or compression effects.
  • Weight loss: Often significant due to reduced food intake from the fear of postprandial pain.
  • Fear of eating or food aversion
  • Bloating and digestive problems

Popliteal Vein / Artery Compression (Entrapment Syndrome)

Description: Popliteal Vein or Artery Compression, also known as Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome, involves the compression of the popliteal vessels (either the vein or the artery) by the surrounding musculature or tendinous structures near the knee. This condition can affect the blood flow in the lower extremities and is more commonly associated with the artery than the vein.

Symptoms:

  • Pain in the calf
  • Intermittent claudication
  • Swelling in the leg
  • Decreased pulse in the foot
  • Feeling of tightness or pressure in the leg
  • possibly deep vein thrombosis (DVT)

Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS)

Description: also known as Wilkie’s syndrome, occurs when the duodenum (the first part of the small intestine) is compressed between two arteries: the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta. This rare, potentially life-threatening gastro-vascular disorder is typically due to an unusually sharp angle at the junction where the superior mesenteric artery branches from the aorta, leading to pressure on the duodenum.

Symptoms:

  • Abdominal pain
  • Postprandial fullness
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Significant weight loss
  • Gastroesophageal reflux
  • Anorexia

Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS)

Description: Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS) is a chronic condition primarily affecting women and is characterized by the presence of varicose veins in the pelvic region. These veins become enlarged due to venous insufficiency, which is a failure of the valves in the veins to effectively keep blood flowing toward the heart, causing blood to pool.

Symptoms:

  • Chronic pelvic pain especially after standing for long periods
  • Painful intercourse
  • Fullness or Heaviness in the Pelvis
  • Visible Varicose Veins
  • Irritable Bladder or Dysuria
  • Backache and Leg Pain

Nutcracker Syndrome

Description: Nutcracker Syndrome is a vascular condition where the left renal vein becomes compressed between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta. This compression can lead to increased pressure in the renal vein and cause various symptoms due to restricted blood flow out of the left kidney.

Symptoms:

  • Hematuria (blood in urine)
  • Flank pain
  • Pelvic pain
  • Varicocele
  • Menstrual Irregularities and Pelvic Congestion in Women
  • Fatigue and Generalized Weakness

May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS)

Description: also known as iliac vein compression syndrome, is a condition where the right common iliac artery compresses the left common iliac vein against the lumbar spine. This compression can lead to a decrease in blood flow in the vein and an increased risk of developing a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the left leg.

Symptoms:

  • Leg swelling
  • Leg heaviness and fatigue
  • Varicose veins
  • Changes in skin coloration
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)

These syndromes often require a combination of imaging studies for proper diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach for effective management, including vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and other specialists. Treatment options vary based on the specific condition and can range from conservative management to surgical intervention.

The Risks of Open Surgery

Scarring and Adhesion Formation

After open surgery, the body’s natural healing process initiates the formation of scar tissue. While scarring is a common and expected outcome, excessive scar tissue formation can lead to complications. These complications include the development of adhesions, which are bands of fibrous tissue that can bind organs and tissues that are not normally connected. Adhesions can cause various complications, such as restricted movement, chronic pain, and even intestinal blockages in severe cases. These issues may not only negate the benefits of the initial surgery but can also necessitate further surgical interventions to correct new problems that arise from adhesions.

Neural Damage

In the context of open surgery, there is an inherent risk of damage to the nerves. Nerves may be compressed or pinched during the procedure, or accidentally cut or nicked during dissection. This can result in worsened sensory or motor deficits, which might be permanent. The risk is especially significant in surgeries that involve operating near delicate or densely packed neural structures. The complexity of nerve repair means that any damage can have long-lasting or irreversible effects on the patient’s sensory and motor functions.

Lymphatic Damage

The lymphatic system plays a critical role in maintaining fluid balance, defending against infections, and facilitating immune responses. Damage to the lymphatic channels during surgery can disrupt these functions, leading to lymphedema. Lymphedema is characterized by persistent swelling due to fluid accumulation, particularly in the limbs, and can be difficult to manage. Managing lymphedema often requires ongoing care, including physical therapy, compression garments, and in some cases, further surgical procedures. The chronic nature of lymphedema can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life and lead to long-term health issues.

Other Negative Consequences

Open surgery typically involves longer recovery times compared to less invasive procedures. This extended recovery can increase the risk of complications such as infections, particularly if the surgical wounds are large. Additionally, patients often experience significant pain during the healing process, which can impair their mobility and delay their return to normal activities. Each of these factors can complicate a patient’s recovery and overall health outcomes, extending the impact of the surgery beyond the immediate post-operative period.

Considering Alternatives to Open Surgery

Given the potential complications associated with open surgery, it is crucial to consider less invasive alternatives that can offer symptom relief with fewer risks:

  • Physical Therapy: Engaging in targeted exercises and receiving manual therapy can improve muscle strength and joint function, which might alleviate symptoms caused by compression syndromes without the need for surgical intervention.
  • Medications: The use of anti-inflammatory drugs and pain relievers can effectively manage pain and inflammation associated with compression syndromes, providing relief without the risks of surgery.
  • Lifestyle Adjustments: Making simple ergonomic changes at work or during daily activities can significantly reduce the stress on affected areas, which helps in managing symptoms effectively.
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures: Techniques such as nerve blocks, steroid injections, or endoscopic surgeries can address specific symptoms and areas of compression with minimal disruption to surrounding tissues, offering a quicker recovery and reduced risk of complications.

The Path Forward

Patients and healthcare providers must carefully consider the risks and benefits of all treatment options available for compression syndromes. In many cases, it is advisable to attempt less invasive management strategies before resorting to open surgery. It is also critical for patients to be fully informed about the potential long-term consequences of open surgical procedures, including the possibility that such interventions could lead to outcomes that are worse than the original symptoms of the condition.

In conclusion, while open surgery can resolve certain anatomical causes of compression syndromes, the potential for significant and sometimes irreversible damage makes it an option that should be approached with considerable caution. Exploring and exhausting less invasive treatment options not only minimizes risks but also supports a more holistic approach to healthcare.

--

--

M.E. Barbati
M.E. Barbati

Written by M.E. Barbati

Dr. Barbati is a consultant vascular surgeon at University Hospital RWTH Aachen. He has authored several publications and books regarding vascular diseases.

No responses yet