Mark Humphries
Jun 16, 2019 · 1 min read

Dear Alessandro,

Many thanks for reading. Two good questions. Some answers:

(1) “knowledge vs skills”: in part you restated my point. I agree, the knowledge content of a PhD is indeed always narrow, and in the vast majority of cases is useless to a future career. But the key is the skills acquired in getting that PhD. Hence I wrote about the many transferable skills that could or ought to be acquired during a PhD — and noted that much more needs to be done to support PhD candidates in obtaining the necessary skills for a job market in which academia is the minority of positions

(2) I don’t think my piece presents the bright side of a PhD. After all, it says: “that job you’re training for? You won’t get it.” Rather the purpose of the piece is two-fold: (a) deliver that message, because supervisors often do not, and that’s a failure of care; (b) give genuine hope for what else can be done.

The actual experience of doing a PhD is a different topic, and as you say the experience is often difficult in places. Mine was.

Mark Humphries

Written by

Uses his brain to understand brains. Is that possible? Neuroscience:

More From Medium

More from Mark Humphries

More from Mark Humphries

More from Mark Humphries

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade