I need your help: Theories of Change for promoting Empowerment/Accountability in Fragile States
I love the summer lull. Everyone heads off for holidays, there are no meetings, so I can get my head down and
Somalia: Anyone seen a good Theory of Change?
write. Last year, it was wrestling How Change Happens to the finishing line. This year is less cosmic, but still interesting, and I need your help.
Subject: Theories of change for Empowerment and Accountability (E&A) programming in Fragile and Conflict Affected States (FCAS). This is one of the inception papers for a new, acronym-tastic research programme on E&A in FCAS, led by IDS, with Oxfam and several others. Findings a couple of years.
The task: An evidence synthesis paper (full ToRs here — ToRs Synthesis paper on Theories of Change Action in Fragile and Conflict States).
Given the particularities of context, E&A outcomes in FCAS are expected to be achieved through somewhat different pathways, in which informal institutions, a diversity of non-state actors and local states play a greater role than in other settings. Donor interventions have so far focused on working initially on the supply side (through public sector reform efforts) and now more on the demand side (the citizen-led accountability work). However, it is increasingly clear that neither of these strategies are delivering the scale of change that is needed — and there has been more of a shift towards ‘politically smart, locally-led’ approaches.
This synthesis paper will unpack the different theories of change currently used to guide support for social and political action for E&A in FCAS, and how the evidence stacks up against them.
What I’m looking for — sources:
Existing literature or systematic reviews
Relevant documentation from networks (Developmental Leadership Program, Doing Development Differently, Thinking and Working Politically) and the Overseas Development Institute
Relevant documentation from DFID (eg work in Mozambique), World Bank, SDC and DFAT
Relevant documentation from INGOs
And of course, because it’s about theories of change, there has to be a diagram (apologies for lousy quality — no link to fuzzy thinking, obvs)
Over to you — please send links, documents etc either via comments or direct via email.