1. How am I guilty of prejudice? I’ve always maintained that I am not convinced one way or the other, but rather am attacking you for making up your mind despite having less-than-adequate evidence.
2. You don’t get extremely intoxicated, drift into a totally cogent and clear state for 2 hours, and then black out without drinking more alcohol. Again, this text calls much into question and the fact that she hid it says a lot about her objectives with this trial.
3. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — PLEASE STOP. “It could also be objected for the fact that it is being brought up this late in the case”…NO IT FUCKING COULDN’T. When an opposing party asks for documents/evidence and you don’t turn them over, they are in violation of a COURT ORDER. This is likely going to be a mistrial and Doe and her lawyers just wasted tens of thousands of dollars of taxpayer money because she was afraid that text would hurt her case. She is in the wrong by withholding. THIS IS NOT OBJECTIONABLE -STOP USING TERMS YOU WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND.
4. Again — prove your credibility or stop talking to me. I do care what you do for a living because I think it will shed a lot of light on how little you actually know. I mentioned you being similar to Trump earlier and the analogy is especially compelling here — you keep saying things that aren’t true, then pretend like they are, and then when confronted, bring some other asinine argument out of the woodwork.

You may be one of the least coherent and self-conscious people I’ve ever encountered, whether online or in real life. Get a grip. If you want to criticize something, you should seek to understand it first, and you have zero understanding of the law. Now please, stop. Watch the Derrick Rose trial and make an informed decision.