Solving the Election with Strategic Voting
Michael Oman-Reagan
58

sort of an agreement

yes, we do need to vote strategically, but as a progressive, against war, against TPP, against fracking, and foremost against corruption, i will be voting strategically for anyone who can beat hillary clinton.

everything we fear about trump we have already seen from clinton.

he wants to ban muslims, but she bombs them. he wants to bar refugees, but she will create them. to my knowledge he has never destabilized a sovereign nation for profit and sent its refugees back.

i do not believe he has yet exposed national security information for personal gain, nor accepted bribes from foreign governments for arms deals.

a vote for hillary clinton is a sure vote for never ending war and profiteering by the wealthy on the blood and bodies of our nation.

trump is only worrying.

besides, he’s only hillary’s handpuppet, created by the clintons to benefit the clintons by making her look good somehow. i am not fooled. for the first time in my life i am thankful for a republican congress.

there are only three good options with hillary clinton: indict, defeat, or impeach.

the fate of the nation and the world depends on it.

so yes, for the sake of our common goals, i will be voting for anyone who can defeat hillary clinton. first things first.