You aren’t doing anyone any harm by consuming child porn, unless you pay for the child porn. How then in a free democracy is it illegal to view free speech? How is it ethical to allow layers, judges, juries, etc to view child porn to convict a ‘possesor’, but not the possessor? How is that even remotely ethical?

Explain to me who you hurt by consuming CP (when you don’t buy it) and HOW you hurt them.

There’s never any logical counter argument, mostly because there isn’t one to give. People just have innate ideas about these things despite the fact they are wrong. They want to dictate their personal morality about things without any reason, logic, fairness, etc. The same exact people that defend ‘free speech’ go to unwiting lengths to justify it’s governmental censorship.

As a long time GG supporter, and anti-feminist, i’m honestly ashamed by how many people are so quick to judge. By angry at NoA if you want, or even at Rap for her mistreatement of the community she is supposed to serve, but saying she deserves to be fired for her ideas is EXACTLY what GG should be against, regardless of how you try to justify it. Shameless SJW tactics being used and consequently justified. Sure, there is a difference between someone who’s speech is being hired for, and someone who’s speach isn’t being hired for, being fired over their speech. I absolutely agree, but that doesn’t make it RIGHT. It just means it isn’t as bad. Do her views actually effect her job performance? No, not at all. So is trying to get her fired over them JUSTIFIED? No. It’s just LESS BAD than if her job had NOTHING to do with her speech.