Well, here I am due to the clickbait in my email.

Since we all are for primary sources:

My delegate source was there and, yes, some Bernie delegates *were* locked out of the rules committee. HC delegates were told on cue what to vote against during the rules committee by a screen in front of them that signaled them when anything a Bernie delegate proposed came up. They didn’t even listen or allow them to finish, would “vote”, then continue on. That’s not how the rules committee is supposed to work. Major news outlets were unable to comment on that, however.

700 up to 800 of Bernie’s volunteers were barred from the convention on Jul 26, and no, not for protesting. They were kicked out without reason given, before the protests even picked up. All HC volunteers were to be seated. No big reports on that.

My delegate source watched the “news” in disbelief as they saw that CNN muted the protester chants and added in fake applause for HC’s speeches. It makes for a better show, I guess. Still no report of what happened to Nina Turner or the protests when it happened.

So, yeah, these are clickhole sites, but really, can we judge people for attempting to look for news from somewhere else? It’s as if you can’t rely on a source until you find sites that barely show up on search engines. It’s a shame that it is this hard to rely on information. That’s what we should be talking about.