hmm. I’ve noticed something strange: the frequency at which commenters include the authors name…

I used her name in a comment I made on the article she wrote about Ryan Lochte. I did it because she asked the laziest question all lazy journalists ask in 2016: would Lochte & friends have been treated differently if they were brown?

I didn’t use her name there because she’s a girl. I did it to call her out because that question is so stupid, and it had nothing whatever to do with the thrust of the story she was writing. I found it to be a pandering, unimaginative, and ultimately lazy way to try and inject a “hot take” narrative where it didn’t belong.

Your observation is an interesting one, though, and perhaps you’ve stumbled onto a kernel of truth. But I read Ms. McNear’s articles regularly (I read most of the articles on The Ringer) and my humble opinion is that she is nothing special as a journalist. She may become one yet, as she gets older and writes more, but not yet.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.