Listen you wannabe Paedophile…
Ah, I see you are the kind of idiot that can only resort to name calling. I’m not a “wannabe” pedophile; I am a pedophile, period.
I do not need education, I am very aware of the realities involved when an adult has sex with a child, be it a child prostitute or something forcible.
You do not need an education, and yet you show at every word that comes out of that asshole you have in the middle of your face that you still can’t differentiate in your mind between a pedophile (characterized by feelings) and a child molester (characterized by acts committed against a child), you can’t understand that most pedophiles never molest and most child molesters are not pedophiles, and that pedophilia is not even an act, therefore is not the legal definition of anything.
I know very well the realities involved when an adult has sex with a child, and that’s precisely why I’m a non-offending pedophile.
I could delight in piling stigma on Paedophiles, they are after all sick, psychologically damaged, and abhorrent…
Just goes to show the kind of lowlife scumbag you are, delighting in stigmatizing an entire population of innocent individuals based on the crimes of a few of them, contributing to the stigma that drives thousands upon thousands of teenagers to suicide. It makes you a vile human being.
And yeah, I should have assumed you were the kind of hateful bigot to assume pedophiles are “sick, psychologically damaged and abhorrent”. As if an unchosen biological characteristic — be it “natural” or “disordered” — somehow determined a person’s moral worth or quality. Are autistic people also “abhorrent”? Are homosexuals abhorrent?
…but in this case all I have done is REFUTE the other idiot’s claim that child prostitution is an imaginary claim by “a victim industry”.
No, you did not refute anything, you just stated that people are “charged with pedophilia” and that “pedophilia is a legal term” which is bullshit and only shows how big of an ignorant moron you are. And no, a “pedophilic act” is not a legal term either, you fucktard.
Your disingenuous claim that a teenager is not a child is not supported in either law or reality. It is a part of you wishful thinking it seems. Early teens are definitely children, late teens youths.
You still don’t know what a pedophile is. A pedophile is someone who has a sustained attraction to prepubescent children. Do you understand the word prepubescent, or should I look it up for you in a dictionary again? As such, I have absolutely zero interest in teenagers, which I have not labeled as “adults” as you claim. So shut the fuck up and stop assuming you know my motivations to use the language I use.
Lastly, as already plainly stated, I am not in Great Britain. Learn a bit about language and geography.
Lastly, you’re just a little stupid. What does language and geography have to do with my assumption that you’re British? You spell paedophile as opposed to pedophile, therefore it was a very reasonable assumption. And English is spoken in quite a few countries in the world.
Your claim to being a non-offending paedophile is not reinforced by your attempt to label teenagers as adults, and choosing an image of a young child as a bio pic.
My “claim” to being a non-offending pedophile is reinforced by the fact that I am a non-offending pedophile, no matter how much you want to assume I’m not, you assclown. I have never harmed a child and I am very much committed never to. And like I said, I have no interest in teenagers and I have not labeled them as adults. Show me where I have, idiot.
And… OMG I HAVE USED A DRAWING OF A CHILD AS MY AVATAR! THE HORROR! IMAGINE THE HOURS OF IMAGINARY THERAPY THAT THIS IMAGINARY CHARACTER IS GOING TO NEED NOW!
Can you get more stupid than this? I urge you to keep trying.
You disgust me.
The feeling is mutual.
