The Shocking Secret About Static Types
Eric Elliott

I’m sorry but the research you cite is simply irrelevant. Putting C++ on the same graph as those other languages simply doesn’t make any sense. You simply don’t use that language for the same kind of tasks as the others! Generalizing this argument, I wouldn’t be surprised to find a correlation between the difficulty of the programming task and the likelihood of choosing a language with a stronger type system. Statistics is just using numbers to lie in an elaborate manner, unless you rigorously take hidden variables into account.

On an orthogonal note; people usually relate dynamic/static types as a trade-off between productivity/safety. So, then, it’s relevant to compare how writing a lot of tests to compensate for the lack of types impacts productivity. I also find it much more pleasing to read and write type signatures rather than tests.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.