Aaron Sorkin Teaches You How To Win the Lottery
Laura Olin

The gatekeeper idea you mention is one of these elements that I feel is self-reinforcing. Despite filmmaking equipment getting progressively cheaper, even indie budgets are growing, & the whole industry is getting more and more insular, with low acceptance for spec scripts & a lot of big-budget low-risk franchise flicks. From the 70s straight through the 90s, even though film cameras were an expensive specialty item & editing equipment was difficult to use & to afford, we had people dropping lots of money trying to make (mostly awful) films. Today, when it’s possible for someone in the lower middle class in the west to make a feature length film with only the phone & the computer they already have (paying nothing for software), we still have big-budget theoretically-indie youtube channels, rather than an explosion in amateur narrative films.

I used to run something called the “No Budget Film Contest”. We’d take submissions of films, rank them, & give small (less than $10) cash prizes to the top 3. For a film to be eligible, the creator of the film could not have paid for anything specifically for the film, with the exception of camera rental — no paid actors, no set pieces or props, no expensive editing software. The goal was to demonstrate that one could make reasonably interesting movies using no resource other than time: in other words, that small scale productions can be valuable, and that you don’t need to get studio involvement or a successful kickstarter to make a film. It’s been a while since I hosted one of those, but it might be time again.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.