If I am not mistaken Cops are already suppose to uphold all Laws to begin with and Federal Laws…
Randel Garrett

@Randel In Mack and Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in a very thorough analysis of this very question, stated in no uncertain terms:

We held in New York [New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 166] that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the States’ officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case-by case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.

It is so ordered.

Your belief has officially been annihilated. Time to rethink your understanding of the concept of DUAL SOVEREIGNTY.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.