And actually, that is misleading as well. Women are just more likely to be protected by courts all around. More likely to never be charged with crimes or let off easy.
Perfect example: I was once arrested and charged for assaulting my wife’s hand with my face while I slept. I’m not joking. She was drunk and angry and punched me in the face while I slept, breaking her hand and my jaw. I was arrested because she got scared and ran off and called the police. Mind you, she was really drunk and irrational. I was arrested and charged with a crime. They offered to let me go with probation if I confessed or rot in jail for months while fighting it.
Later, I went to the da to reverse it, he refused. He said the only way he would reverse it is if she confessed to attacking me. He called her and she confessed. The da then claimed it was self defense and the charge stood.
Care to explain that? How my poor oppressed wife was hurt?
A sex more likely to commit a crime is not an excuse. That’s total bullshit. I once also saw a doctor not get custody to a child to an unemployed convicted and known current heroin addict mother. The court claimed she was more fit because she didn’t have a job.
You can’t defend courts as really being not biased that’s like claiming black people all deserve to be in jail because they commit more crimes, but you won’t say that even though it is an identical argument will you? You are the first person I have ever seen in my life actually try to claim men don’t deserve to have custody of their children because they are evil by nature.
I take it back, you are the self loathing bigot I originally thought. Oh well, it was a nice thought for a couple hours that a pc warrior douche was not a sexist bigot as well. I should have known better, but I try not to judge unlike you.
