Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE: “due to the anchor-to-iceberg problem inherent in the design.”xxxxxxxx <xxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:Jul 16, 2018Jul 16, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE:[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)-12018–02–23 1:32 GMT+03:00 xxx@xxx>:Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto Mails[Cryptography] Super-rational attackOn Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:27 PM, xxx@xxx wrote:Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE:[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)-62018–03–02 18:32 GMT+03:00 xxx@xxx:Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE:[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)-4Questions I received show that I failed explaining the P-SMTP world to some of the people in the list. This is a further clarification.Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE:[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)-32018–02–28 20:53 GMT+03:00 xxx@xxx:Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE:[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)-2First, your mail has gone to my spam box at Gmail, which funnily shows we must do better anti-spam. Well, PSMTP does not suffer false…Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto MailsRE:[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)2018–02–27 22:53 GMT+03:00 xxxx xxxx<xxxx@xxx.xxx>[1]:Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018
Ersin TaskininCrypto Mails[Cryptography] Paid SMTP (PSMTP)I received some remarks and challenges to my proposal for PSMTP. Some through the mail list, some in private. I researched the anti-spam…Mar 7, 2018Mar 7, 2018