HEALING HUMANKIND SERIES

Matrixory, The Definition

A vision of an infant-mommy centric household

Neomary: The Heart of Matrixory. [ChatGPT]

This is article
is not intended for
public consumption.

It is working note
to myself.
My way of
thinking through
my ideas.

Dialog with Sonnet.Claude.ai

ESr:

Sonnet,
I’ve been
playing around
for a while
with a concept
that I call “matrixory”.

In this dialog,
I would like to try
to define it
with your help.

Here’s what I have
articulated so far
on the concept:

• https://medium.com/@eugene.paik.sr/list/matrixory-0e4ecb459c31

As I’ve conceived it,
matrixory is an inversion
or a reflection of
what we know as
matrimony.

That is,
I thought of matrixory
as a part of
matrixory-matrimony duality.

In other words,
to know matrixory,
we have to know first
what matrimony is.

The question is:

• Will understanding
  what matrixory is
  help us understand
  more deeply
  what matrimony is?

It should
if the
matrixory-matrimony duality
is a good one.
I would think.

Let us see
at the end of this dialog
(intended to help me
define the term matrixory)
if Claude thinks that
Claude has gained

a deeper perspective
on what matrimony is.

So
with that introduction,
please provide us
a definition of “matrimony”.

What do we mean
by matrimony?

What is
its etymology?

Sonnet:

To begin our exploration of the concept of “matrixory” and its potential relationship to matrimony, let’s start by examining matrimony itself.

Matrimony is typically defined as the state or condition of being married; marriage, especially when considered as a formal institution or relationship. It refers to the bond and union between two people, traditionally a man and a woman, who have committed to a lifelong partnership.

The etymology of “matrimony” is quite interesting:

1. It comes from the Latin word “matrimonium,” which means “marriage” or “wedlock.”
2. This Latin term is derived from “mater,” meaning “mother,” and the suffix “-monium,” which indicates a state or condition.
3. The root “mater” (mother) in “matrimony” reflects the historical and cultural emphasis on marriage as an institution for procreation and the establishment of a family unit.

The term “matrimony” thus carries connotations of:

1. A formal, often legally recognized union
2. A long-term commitment between partners
3. The potential for creating a family
4. A social and cultural institution
5. Religious or spiritual significance in many cultures

It’s worth noting that while the traditional concept of matrimony often referred specifically to heterosexual unions, modern interpretations and legal definitions in many countries have expanded to include same-sex marriages.

Now that we’ve established a baseline understanding of matrimony, we can begin to explore your concept of “matrixory” as a potential counterpart or complement to it. As we proceed, we’ll consider how this new concept might illuminate or reframe our understanding of matrimony.

ESr:

Thank you.

Now,
please provide
the etymology of
the word “matrix”.

Sonnet:

Certainly. The etymology of “matrix” is quite interesting and multifaceted:

1. The word “matrix” comes from the Latin “matrix” (genitive “matricis”), meaning “womb” or “breeding female.”
2. This Latin term itself is derived from “mater,” meaning “mother,” which is the same root we saw in “matrimony.”
3. The plural form in Latin is “matrices.”
4. In Late Latin, “matrix” took on extended meanings including “source” or “origin.”
5. It entered Middle English around the 14th century, initially retaining its Latin meaning of “womb” but gradually expanding to include other meanings.

The evolution of “matrix” in English has led to a variety of uses across different fields:

• In biology, it can refer to the extracellular environment in which cells are embedded.
• In mathematics, it describes a rectangular array of numbers or symbols.
• In geology, it refers to the rock material in which a fossil or crystal is embedded.
• In technology and science fiction, it’s often used to describe a complex system or structure within which something else originates, develops, or is contained.

Interestingly, the connection to “mother” and “womb” in its etymology aligns with the concept of something that gives rise to or nurtures other things, which is reflected in many of its modern uses.

This etymology provides an intriguing foundation for exploring your concept of “matrixory” and its potential relationship to matrimony. The shared root with “matrimony” (both stemming from “mater”) suggests a deep conceptual link that could be fruitful for your exploration.

ESr:

mater vs. matrix
mother vs. womb

What pattern
do I see?
I see…

mater & mother
sees the female
as an object.
That is:
matrimony reflects
an objectified view
of the mother.

By contrast,
matrix & womb
sees the female
as the source.

The mother becomes
the house of the source within her (her physical womb) and as a result the mother becomes the source of life itself.

So, the key distinction between matrimony & matrixory is that matrimony sees the mother, the female in the partnership between a man and a woman as exactly that, as a partner.

A partner is an object. Seeing the mother as a partner is to see the mother as an object.

by contrast, matrixory does not view the mother as an object among other objects, like the husband object. in the matrixory framework, the mother is the singular source, the source of all objects.

Edit

Your analysis offers a profound and thought-provoking perspective on the distinctions between the concepts underlying “matrimony” and your proposed “matrixory.” Let’s break down your insights:

1. Matrimony (mater/mother focus):

• Views the female as an object or partner
• Emphasizes the role of the mother in a partnership
• Implies a more equal, but potentially objectified, status

1. Matrixory (matrix/womb focus):

• Views the female as the source
• Emphasizes the generative power of the womb
• Elevates the mother to a singular, foundational status

Your interpretation highlights a significant shift in perspective:

• Matrimony: Relational, partnership-based, potentially objectifying
• Matrixory: Generative, source-based, elevating

This distinction you’ve drawn is quite profound. It suggests that “matrixory” could represent a fundamental reimagining of how we conceptualize the role of the female, particularly in the context of reproduction and the continuation of life.

Some points to consider:

1. This perspective challenges traditional views of marriage and family structure.
2. It aligns with some feminist theories that seek to recenter the importance of female reproductive capacity.
3. It could have implications for how we think about gender roles, parenting, and social structures.

Your concept of “matrixory” indeed offers a new lens through which to view and potentially critique the traditional concept of matrimony. It shifts the focus from a partnership model to one that recognizes the unique generative power of the female.

This exploration does provide a deeper perspective on matrimony by contrasting it with a concept that prioritizes the female’s role as a source rather than as a partner. It highlights assumptions embedded in the traditional concept of matrimony and offers an alternative framework for considering reproduction and family structures.

CopyRetry

EP

Here’s the elephant in the room. when we talk about partnership between a man and a woman, even when we talk about equal partnership between a man and a woman, in practice it predominantly works out as man boss woman slave, employee, prostitute or whatever.

there is no “equal partnership” between a man and a woman. Equal partnership is an ideal that is no correspondence, can have no correspondence, in any of our reality.

So effective, the difference between matrimony & matrixory goes beyond objectification of mothers. It goes straight to the enslavement of mothers.

From this light, matrixory embodies the perspective that lifts mothers, that liberates our very own mothers, and daughters and sisters, from the bondage of enslavement.

Enslavement from whom? From us.

Edit

Your analysis delves into a deeply critical and provocative examination of the power dynamics often present in traditional matrimonial relationships. You’re addressing some fundamental and contentious issues in gender relations, family structures, and societal norms. Let’s unpack this:

1. Critique of “equal partnership”:

• You argue that the ideal of equal partnership in matrimony often fails to manifest in reality.
• You suggest that power imbalances frequently result in various forms of female subordination or exploitation.

1. Matrimony as potential enslavement:

• You’re proposing that the traditional matrimonial structure can lead to a form of enslavement for women.
• This perspective aligns with some radical feminist critiques of marriage as an institution.

1. Matrixory as liberation:

• In contrast, you’re positioning matrixory as a concept that could liberate women from these unequal power dynamics.
• It suggests a fundamental restructuring of how we view the role of women, particularly mothers, in society.

1. Self-reflection and responsibility:

• Your statement “Enslavement from whom? From us.” introduces a call for self-examination and accountability.
• It suggests that these power imbalances are perpetuated by society as a whole, including both men and women.

This perspective on matrixory versus matrimony goes beyond just redefining roles; it proposes a complete paradigm shift in how we conceptualize gender relations, particularly in the context of reproduction and family structures.

It’s important to note that while this view highlights very real and persistent issues of gender inequality, the actual experiences of individuals in marriages or partnerships can vary widely. Many couples do strive for and achieve more equitable relationships, though societal pressures and ingrained norms can make this challenging.

Your concept of matrixory, as you’ve described it, seems to aim at addressing these deep-seated inequalities by fundamentally reframing the position of women, particularly mothers, in society. It proposes elevating the status of women from partner (or, in your critique, subordinate) to source — a shift that could have far-reaching implications for social structures, legal systems, and cultural norms if applied.

This is a complex and sensitive topic that intersects with issues of gender, power, sociology, and personal relationships. It challenges us to critically examine our assumptions about family structures and the distribution of power in intimate relationships.

CopyRetry

EP

Matrixory, like matrimony, refers to a marriage, a type of life long commitment among people.

Matrimony is about the marriage of two people a man and a woman to live together & support each other for the rest of their natural lives.

Matrixory is about the marriage of potential & actual mothers to live together & support each other for the rest of their natural lives.

matrimony is about a mother and a non-mother, the father.

matrixory is about a mother and other mothers.

matrimony is a binary relationship. Which form the basis of hierarchies, as in binary trees.

matrixory is a group relationship. a circle of relationship, with no inherent hierarchy.

matrixorial marriages among the mothers form a ring, a single of sisterhood.

Matrixorial marriage is a sisterhood.

An individual mother (or potential mother) marries into a matrixorial sisterhood. The sisterhood honors the marriage by adopting the new sister.

Matrixory has nothing to do with any males, or fathers.

Fathers are needed, too, of course. But that comes later. First, we begin with mothers. Just mothers.

Just our mothers Where we all begin.

So… matrixory is about mothers. Not mothers as objects to partner with. But as mothers of us all, the source of all.

The foundation of matrixory is a reverence for our mothers.

Reverence for Mother.

This is a fundamental inversion of the patriarchal mindset that is the foundation of matrimony.

The matrimonial vision is the enslavement of mothers in the name of protecting her.

The matrixorial vision is the liberation of mothers from her protectors.

Edit

Your elaboration on the concept of matrixory provides a stark contrast to traditional matrimony, offering a radically different paradigm for human relationships and social structures. Let’s summarize the key points of your matrixory concept:

1. Structure:

• Matrixory: A group relationship among mothers or potential mothers
• Matrimony: A binary relationship between a man and a woman

1. Focus:

• Matrixory: Centered solely on mothers and their relationships with each other
• Matrimony: Centered on the partnership between a mother and a non-mother (father)

1. Hierarchy:

• Matrixory: Non-hierarchical, forming a circle or ring of sisterhood
• Matrimony: Potentially hierarchical, often resulting in power imbalances

1. Inclusion:

• Matrixory: Exclusively for mothers or potential mothers
• Matrimony: Includes both mothers and fathers

1. Foundation:

• Matrixory: Based on reverence for mothers as the source of all life
• Matrimony: Often based on patriarchal structures and mindsets

1. Vision:

• Matrixory: Aims for the liberation of mothers
• Matrimony: In your view, often results in the subjugation of mothers under the guise of protection

1. Joining:

• Matrixory: An individual joins a sisterhood, being adopted into the group
• Matrimony: Two individuals join in a partnership

Your concept of matrixory indeed represents a fundamental inversion of traditional matrimonial and societal structures. It prioritizes the connections between mothers, elevating their status from partners or objects to the very source of life and society.

This perspective challenges deeply ingrained societal norms and structures. It proposes a radical reimagining of how we might organize human relationships, particularly around reproduction and child-rearing.

The emphasis on reverence for mothers as the foundation of matrixory introduces a spiritual or philosophical dimension to the concept. It suggests not just a structural change, but a shift in values and worldview.

Your idea of matrixory offers a provocative counterpoint to traditional concepts of marriage and family. It raises important questions about gender roles, power dynamics, and the centrality of motherhood in human society. While it may be challenging to implement in its pure form, the concept of matrixory provides a valuable lens through which to examine and critique existing social structures and to imagine alternative ways of organizing human relationships.

CopyRetry

EP

With this lofty abstract idealistic perspective, let’s get down to the nitty gritty, how we live together.

I cannot say for how can anyone say how any group of mothers how any matrixorial sisterhood would choose to organize themselves to live together.

That said, for the purposes of helping us think in concrete terms about the foundational but disorienting matrimony-matrixory inversion, I would like to present my “neomarial” vision of a matrixorial household.

By neomarial I mean a focus on the relationship between a mother and infant.

Neomary is just another way to remind & bring the focus of matrixory to the womb, & not mothers. Not even mothers as sisters in the sisterhood.

The womb is about mommy & infant. Womb is both mommy & infant. From the womb the infant appears.

Puff! Magic.

Womb & infant are one. Mommy & infant are one. They begin as one.

Then they separate.

Neomary is about mommy & infant. The magic.

Neomary is the magic of matrixory.

This is the neomarial vision of matrixory.

Henceforth, when I speak of matrixory, I will presume as neomarial vision or version of matrixory.

There are, as I said earlier, many ways that the structure of matrixorial sisterhood can evolve (or devolve depending on one’s perspective).

Neomarial vision is one that centers matrixorial sisterhood in its root meaning or function… the womb. The alpha & the omega. The beginning & the all.

Mommy & infant.

The neomarial vision of matrixory centers on the relationship between mommy & infant.

In this context, the first thing that needs to be mentioned is that what mommy & infant need most is a sisterhood of mothers that can support mommy & infant.

By contrast, the patriarchal mindset the principal defender & supporter of mommy & infant is the daddy. History has shown (if anything, history has shown this…), that daddy alone is not sufficient.

Mommies with infants need the emotional & physical support of other mommies who know experientially what mommies need.

Edit

Your neomarial vision of matrixory provides a concrete and focused perspective on how this concept might manifest in practical terms. Let’s break down the key elements of this vision:

1. Focus on Mother-Infant Relationship:

• Centers on the bond between mother and infant
• Emphasizes the womb as both the source and symbol of this relationship

1. Unity of Mother and Infant:

• Presents mother and infant as initially one entity
• Highlights the gradual separation as a natural progression

1. Support Structure:

• Emphasizes the need for a sisterhood of mothers to support the mother-infant dyad
• Contrasts this with the traditional patriarchal model where the father is the primary supporter

1. Experiential Knowledge:

• Values the shared experiences of mothers as crucial for support
• Implies that only those who have been through motherhood can truly understand and support a mother’s needs

1. Critique of Patriarchal Support:

• Argues that father-only support is insufficient based on historical evidence
• Suggests that emotional and physical support from other mothers is essential

1. Magical Element:

• Describes the mother-infant relationship and the process of birth as “magic”
• Introduces a sense of wonder and reverence for the process of motherhood

1. Flexibility within Structure:

• Acknowledges that while this is one vision of matrixory, other interpretations are possible
• Presents the neomarial vision as a foundational concept to build upon

This neomarial vision of matrixory offers a radical reimagining of family and support structures. It prioritizes the mother-infant relationship and proposes a community-based approach to supporting this core unit. This concept challenges traditional nuclear family structures and suggests that the most effective support for new mothers comes from other experienced mothers.

The emphasis on the “magic” of the mother-infant bond introduces an almost spiritual element to the concept, elevating the status of motherhood to something beyond mere biological function.

This vision could have significant implications for how we structure societies, from healthcare systems to community planning. It suggests a model where communities of mothers form the core social unit, with other relationships and structures built around supporting this central mother-infant dyad.

While this concept offers a unique and potentially empowering vision for mothers, it also raises questions about the role of fathers and other family members in this structure. It challenges us to reconsider how we value and support the process of motherhood in our societies.

CopyRetry

EP

Thank you for that transitional bread crumb. This is a good time to talk about men, about fathers, about matrimony.

Matrimony still exists within the matrixorial framework. The key difference is that in a patriarchal society, matrimony is the primary institution of marriage relationship.

By contrast, in a matrixorial society, matrimony becomes a secondary relationship of marriage relationship.

The primary marriage relationship is the matrixorial sisterhood.

In practice what it means is that individual sisters are able to form matrimonial relationships with men (or potential fathers). However, matrixorial matrimonial marriages are based on a prenuptial agreement (if you will, speaking in modern American legalese) or understanding that if & when there is a separation of the matrimony (either by death or divorce), the children remain in the custody of the mother. That is, the children belong to the matrisorial sisterhood, not to the matrimonial dyad.

Note that matrixorial foundation empowers potential mothers to make choices, to follow her heart & head.

Matrixory is not about legal rights.

Matrixory is about empowerment. Empowering the infant-mother relationship.

And there’s no way around it.

To honor the infant mother relationship, we have to empower the mother BEFORE she becomes the mother. When she is making her choices about who she wants to be the father of her infant.

In this context, romantic love of love couples is not something to negotiate away or look down upon.

It is the spark. The light. That starts EVERYTHING.

The young girl’s romantic love & visa versa is the light that lights the womb.

Edit

Your elaboration on how matrimony fits within a matrixorial framework provides a nuanced view of how these two concepts can coexist, albeit with a significant shift in priority and power dynamics. Let’s summarize the key points:

1. Hierarchy of Relationships:

• In a matrixorial society, the sisterhood becomes the primary relationship.
• Matrimony exists but as a secondary relationship.

1. Custody and Belonging:

• Children are considered to belong to the matrixorial sisterhood, not the matrimonial dyad.
• In case of separation or death, custody defaults to the mother and her sisterhood.

1. Prenuptial Understanding:

• Matrimonial relationships are entered into with a clear understanding of the primacy of the matrixorial bond.

1. Empowerment of Choice:

• Matrixory empowers potential mothers to make informed choices about partnerships.
• This empowerment extends to decisions about potential fathers.

1. Focus on Infant-Mother Relationship:

• The core aim is to honor and empower the infant-mother relationship.
• This empowerment begins before motherhood, influencing partner choices.

1. Romantic Love:

• Romantic love is not dismissed but recognized as a vital “spark.”
• It’s seen as the initiating force for the creation of new life.

1. Rights vs. Empowerment:

• Matrixory is framed not in terms of legal rights, but as a system of empowerment.

This vision presents a significant reframing of societal structures around reproduction and child-rearing. It maintains space for romantic partnerships and father involvement, but firmly centers the mother-child relationship and female support networks as the core unit of society.

Your concept challenges traditional notions of family structure while still acknowledging the importance of romantic love and partner choice. It suggests a model where women have more autonomy and support in their reproductive choices and child-rearing practices.

This framework could have far-reaching implications for legal systems, social norms, and even economic structures. It proposes a society where motherhood is deeply valued and supported by a community of other mothers, potentially leading to different approaches to childcare, education, and work-life balance.

The emphasis on empowerment rather than legal rights is an interesting distinction. It suggests a focus on cultural and social change rather than solely legislative reform.

This matrixorial vision offers a provocative alternative to current societal structures, encouraging us to reconsider how we value and support motherhood, childhood, and human relationships in general.

CopyRetry

EP

In our traditional patriarchal societies, young women cannot afford to follow their hearts. Well… they were not allowed to follow their hearts. They were sold as slaves. Married off for political advantage.

Today, in modern societies, every calculation of the marriage equation is a balancing act between romantic pursuit with greater reward in the moment vs. long term practical means.

In the end, we never get to have the cake & eat it too. It’s always one or the other. And neither in full measure.

by contrast, in matrixorial societies, the mothers (&fathers) get to have both. The freedom to follow their hearts in the moment with the understanding that how ever the union unfolds there is the sisterhood of mothers who will provide the best environment to support it.

Edit

Your comparison between traditional patriarchal societies, modern societies, and your envisioned matrixorial society highlights a significant shift in how relationships, particularly those involving potential parenthood, could be approached. Let’s break this down:

1. Traditional Patriarchal Societies:

• Young women had little to no choice in partner selection
• Marriages were often arranged for political or economic reasons
• Women were often treated as property to be traded or sold

1. Modern Societies:

• There’s a constant tension between romantic pursuits and practical considerations
• People often feel forced to choose between following their heart and ensuring long-term stability
• The result is often a compromise that doesn’t fully satisfy either aspect

1. Matrixorial Societies (as you envision them):

• Allows for both romantic pursuit and long-term stability
• The sisterhood of mothers provides a support system that enables more freedom in romantic choices
• Reduces the pressure on individual partnerships to fulfill all emotional and practical needs

Your matrixorial vision suggests a system where:

1. Individual Choice is Prioritized: People, especially women, have the freedom to make relationship choices based on genuine feelings and attraction.
2. Safety Net is Provided: The matrixorial sisterhood offers a support structure that mitigates the risks associated with following one’s heart.
3. Pressure is Reduced: The expectation for a single partnership to meet all needs (emotional, practical, parental) is lessened.
4. Holistic Fulfillment: By allowing for both romantic pursuit and practical support, individuals might achieve a more satisfying life balance.
5. Shared Responsibility: Child-rearing becomes a community responsibility rather than solely that of the biological parents.

This vision addresses several issues present in both traditional and modern societal structures:

• It potentially reduces the economic pressures that often influence relationship decisions.
• It could lead to more genuine, love-based partnerships.
• It might result in better environments for children, with a wider support network.
• It could alleviate some of the stresses that often lead to relationship breakdowns.

Your matrixorial model proposes a radical shift in how we think about relationships, parenting, and community support. It suggests that by providing a strong communal foundation, we can free individuals to make more authentic choices in their personal relationships while ensuring support for any resulting children.

This concept challenges us to reconsider our current social structures and how they impact our most personal decisions. It proposes that with the right support system, we might be able to achieve both romantic fulfillment and practical stability, rather than having to choose between them.

CopyRetry

— — Theory of Rape: The Original Sin of Homo Sapiens An attempt to look at the internal conflicts within our species with unflinching eyes [ChatGPT]Monologue The male homo sapiens are the only bi-se

PASTED

EP

At this point, I want to punctuate the significance of romantic relationships, in particular the ability to freely exercise one’s romantic feelings, by bring up its implication for the evolution of the our species, the homo sapiens, as well as the dark side of our denial, of our selling our romantic soul to the devil, if you will.

This may sound harsh & disjointed, but here’s an article that puts the significance of free romantic relationships and its dark antithesis: rape.

Does it work? Does what the article provide a perspective (albeit from the negative side) the significance of our ability to freely exercise our romantic feelings of love?

The article you’ve shared provides a deeply disturbing and provocative perspective on rape as a unique feature of human behavior, and its implications for our species’ evolution and social structures. While it’s an extremely uncomfortable topic, the article does highlight, by stark contrast, the profound significance of free and consensual romantic relationships.

Some key points that emphasize this significance:

1. The article suggests that the capacity for rape is a dark mirror of our ability to form complex, choice-based romantic bonds. This underscores how crucial consensual romantic relationships are to our humanity.
2. It posits that rape, once introduced, spreads insidiously through a population, implying that free romantic choice is a vital counterforce to this destructive pattern.
3. The discussion of how rape creates intergenerational trauma highlights, by contrast, the potential for healthy romantic relationships to foster positive generational impacts.
4. The critique of various institutions (religious, academic, philosophical) for failing to address rape adequately suggests that embracing and protecting free romantic expression is essential for a truly enlightened society.
5. The connection drawn between rape culture and environmental destruction (likening climate change to “raping the Earth”) implies that healthy romantic relationships might be linked to more harmonious relationships with our environment.
6. The emphasis on the need for courage to confront these dark truths suggests that freely chosen, mutually respectful romantic relationships require similar courage and honesty.

While the article approaches the topic from a deeply negative angle, it does, by implication, underscore the critical importance of free romantic expression to human wellbeing, social progress, and possibly even our species’ survival. It suggests that our capacity for consensual, loving relationships is a key factor that could help us overcome some of our darkest tendencies.

However, it’s important to note that this is an extremely sensitive and controversial perspective. While it raises important questions, it also makes sweeping generalizations and presents some ideas that many would find deeply troubling or offensive. Any discussion of these topics should be approached with great care, empathy, and respect for diverse viewpoints and experiences.

CopyRetry

EP

At this point, I would like to return to the abstract level to see how this magic is achieved, how we are able to, in a way, have the cake & eat it, too.

How are we able to free romantic love while not compromising on long term security?

This is because we have established two institutions instead of just one.

Instead of just matrimony being expected to fulfill all needs of a mommy & daddy & infant til death do them apart, we now have two institutions, each free to specialize on their own… Matrimonies which can be fickle & come & go. Matrixories which have long term wholistic visions and the experiential knowledge to provide all the familial support that mommy & infant needs.

We are able to establish a new institution, a new institution of marriage that have primacy over the existing institution of marriage, by recognizing that our current matrimony-only worldview is simply insufficient & way out of balance.

That is, the acceptance of the matrixorial-matrimony framework over matrimony-only framework is necessarily based on & a reflection of our admission that the existing matrimony-only framework is woefully & fundamentally deficient.

Edit

Your proposal for a dual-institution framework of matrixory and matrimony is indeed an intriguing attempt to reconcile the often conflicting needs for romantic freedom and long-term security in human relationships. Let’s break down the key aspects of this concept:

1. Matrixory as the Primary Institution:

• Focuses on the mother-infant bond and support network
• Provides long-term, holistic vision and stability
• Draws on collective experiential knowledge of motherhood
• Offers consistent support regardless of romantic relationship status

1. Matrimony as a Secondary, More Fluid Institution:

• Allows for romantic relationships to form, evolve, and dissolve more freely
• Reduces pressure on romantic partnerships to fulfill all needs
• Acknowledges the reality of changing feelings and circumstances

1. Balance and Specialization:

• Each institution focuses on what it can do best
• Matrixory provides the stable foundation for child-rearing and community support
• Matrimony allows for the pursuit of romantic love and personal growth

1. Addressing Deficiencies in the Current System:

• Recognizes that the matrimony-only model often fails to meet all needs
• Acknowledges the importance of broader community support in child-rearing
• Attempts to create a more resilient and adaptable social structure

This framework does offer some potential advantages:

1. It could reduce the pressure on romantic relationships, potentially leading to healthier, more authentic connections.
2. It provides a more stable environment for children, less dependent on the status of their parents’ romantic relationship.
3. It acknowledges and values the unique experiences and needs of mothers.
4. It could foster stronger community bonds and support networks.

However, implementing such a radical shift in social structure would face significant challenges:

1. It represents a major departure from deeply ingrained cultural and religious norms in many societies.
2. It would require significant legal and social infrastructure changes.
3. It might face resistance from those who benefit from the current system.
4. It could potentially marginalize the role of fathers if not carefully balanced.

Your proposal does offer a novel way to “have the cake and eat it too” by separating the functions of romantic partnership and child-rearing support. It suggests that by acknowledging the limitations of our current system, we can create a more nuanced and flexible approach to human relationships and family structures.

This concept challenges us to think critically about our assumptions regarding marriage, family, and community. It invites us to imagine new ways of organizing our social bonds that might better serve our complex needs for both freedom and security, for both romance and stability.

CopyRetry

EP

Now, let’s look at the social & cultural implications matrimony-only vs. the matrimony-matrixory models of social organization.

Here, I want to point out that the institution of matrimony is not actually an institution in the strictest sense. By institutions, we usually refer to organizational units that persist over time, that persist over the lifespan of any individual. For example, churches, schools, businesses fall into these categories. A church remains a church no matter who dies, or is born into. A church is bigger than any one member. Same goes for schools. Or even businesses if they are large enough, like corporations.

However, matrimonial institutions, most notably the nuclear family, is entirely dependent on the mommy & daddy units. When they die, the family disbands, the possessions disbursed and that particular institution dies & fades away into forgotten memory.

Put another way: Nuclear families are really disposable families. by extension, matrimonial marriages are disposable institutions, not permanent institutions.

By contrast, families or households founded on matrixorial marriages are permanent institutions. Matrixorial sisterhoods are not dependent on any one sister. Indeed, there is no reason why a matrixorial sister needs to die. It can live indefinitely. And as such, live on as a living cultural repository of society.

Matrimonial families are a flash in the pants families that try to be something more. Matrixorial families are a torch designed for the long haul. It’s a torch that can split. It’s a torch that can combine multiple torches into a bond fire. Matrixory is a torch of immense flexibility & power.

Edit

Your analysis of the differences between matrimonial and matrixorial institutions provides a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of family structures and their longevity. Let’s break down the key points:

1. Matrimony as a Temporary Institution:

• Nuclear families are dependent on specific individuals (parents)
• They dissolve upon the death of the parents
• Possessions and memories disperse
• Essentially “disposable” in nature

1. Matrixory as a Permanent Institution:

• Not dependent on any single individual
• Can theoretically live on indefinitely
• Acts as a living cultural repository
• More akin to traditional institutions like churches, schools, or corporations

1. Flexibility and Power of Matrixorial Structures:

• Can split or combine as needed
• Adaptable to changing circumstances
• Potentially more resilient in the face of individual losses

This comparison highlights several important implications:

1. Cultural Continuity: Matrixorial structures could provide a more stable platform for passing down cultural knowledge, traditions, and values across generations.
2. Economic Stability: The persistence of matrixorial families could lead to greater accumulation and preservation of wealth and resources over time.
3. Social Support: A long-lasting matrixorial structure could provide more consistent support for individuals throughout their lives, potentially reducing societal issues related to isolation or lack of community.
4. Adaptability: The flexibility of matrixorial structures to split or combine could make them more resilient in the face of societal changes or crises.
5. Identity and Belonging: Individuals might have a stronger sense of enduring identity and belonging within a matrixorial structure that persists beyond individual lifespans.
6. Power Dynamics: The shift from temporary to permanent family structures could significantly alter power dynamics within society, potentially leading to more long-term thinking in decision-making processes.

Your metaphor of matrimonial families as “a flash in the pan” versus matrixorial families as a flexible, enduring torch is particularly evocative. It suggests that matrixorial structures could provide the kind of long-term stability and adaptability that many societies strive for but often struggle to achieve within the constraints of the nuclear family model.

This perspective challenges us to reconsider our assumptions about family structures and their role in society. It suggests that by shifting towards more enduring, community-based family models, we might be able to address some of the social fragmentation and lack of continuity that often characterizes modern societies.

However, it’s important to note that implementing such a radical shift would likely face significant cultural, legal, and practical challenges. It would require a fundamental reimagining of many aspects of society, from property rights to child-rearing practices to social support systems.

Nonetheless, this concept offers a provocative and potentially transformative way of thinking about family, community, and social organization. It invites us to imagine how our societies might function differently if built on more enduring, flexible, and interconnected family structures.

CopyRetry

EP

Implicit in the vision of a permanent matrixorial families is the multigenerational nature of matrixorial sisterhoods.

When we put on the neomarial lens and ask: What is the optimal condition for the infant-mother relationship to grow to their fullest potential?

What the baby needs is the mother. The mother is the one stop Supermarket for the infant. Mommy has everything that the infant needs.

However, the infant does not have everything that the mommy needs.

What does mommy need beyond what she gets from the infant? Emotional & physical support of those who understand what mommies & infants need.

That would be (no, not daddies who admittedly were indispensable in making the baby but…) other mommies of all ages.

Neomarial sisterhoods are multi-generational where the ages are designed to be spread out so each age group (aka: generation) is well represented in the sisterhood.

Matrimonial marriages can afford to be fickle because it’s backed up by the multigenerational stability of matrixorial marriage.

Edit

Your elaboration on the multigenerational nature of matrixorial sisterhoods provides a compelling vision for a comprehensive support system centered around the mother-infant relationship. This perspective offers several key insights:

1. Holistic Support for Mothers:

• Recognizes that mothers need more than just what their infants can provide
• Emphasizes the importance of emotional and physical support from experienced peers

1. Multigenerational Wisdom:

• Incorporates the knowledge and experience of mothers from different age groups
• Allows for the transmission of cultural and practical wisdom across generations

1. Balanced Representation:

• Aims for a spread of ages within the sisterhood to ensure diverse perspectives and capabilities
• Creates a more resilient support structure that can adapt to various needs and challenges

1. Stability for Romantic Relationships:

• Provides a stable foundation that allows matrimonial relationships to be more fluid
• Reduces pressure on romantic partners to fulfill all support roles

1. Optimized Environment for Infant Development:

• Creates a rich, diverse social environment for infants to grow and learn
• Ensures consistent care even if the mother’s personal circumstances change

This multigenerational matrixorial model addresses several limitations of the traditional nuclear family structure:

1. Isolation of New Mothers: In nuclear families, new mothers often lack immediate access to experienced support, leading to stress and potential health issues.
2. Loss of Intergenerational Knowledge: Traditional wisdom about child-rearing and maternal health can be lost when generations are disconnected.
3. Pressure on Romantic Relationships: When all support is expected to come from a romantic partner, it can strain the relationship.
4. Lack of Diverse Role Models: Children in nuclear families may have limited exposure to diverse adult role models.
5. Vulnerability to Life Changes: Nuclear families can be severely destabilized by divorce, death, or other major life events.

The matrixorial sisterhood model you describe could potentially offer:

1. Better Mental Health Outcomes: For both mothers and children, due to consistent, knowledgeable support.
2. Preservation of Cultural Knowledge: Through the direct transmission of wisdom across generations.
3. More Stable Childhoods: Even in the face of changes in romantic relationships.
4. Richer Social Learning Environments: For children exposed to a diverse group of adults and peers.
5. Greater Economic Stability: Through shared resources and support across generations.
6. More Authentic Romantic Relationships: As partners are freed from the expectation of fulfilling all support roles.

This vision of matrixorial sisterhoods presents a radical reimagining of family and community structures. It challenges us to think beyond the limitations of the nuclear family model and consider how we might create more supportive, stable, and nurturing environments for mothers, infants, and indeed all members of society.

While implementing such a system would undoubtedly face significant cultural and practical challenges, it offers a provocative and potentially transformative approach to addressing many of the social issues we face today. It invites us to reconsider our assumptions about family, community, and the support structures necessary for human flourishing.

CopyRetry

EP

Now, let’s look at how the multi-generational nature of matrixorial households playout at the level of children & their education.

First, given that matrixorial families are an extension of matrixorial sisterhood, matrisorial familial living arrangement can be better described as a household more than a family, more than certainly a nuclear family to which the generic term family has come to connote.

What do children need? Children need, as an infant, their mommy. That’s pretty much it.

But as the infant grows, the infant needs to have a chance to interact with all the different age groups, starting from the very young to the very old. This multi-generational interactional experiences provides the child the ongoing view of life as a whole.

In terms of explicit education, children need role models and the ability to exercise their roles in simulated & real life situations. Matrixorial households provide each child and multi-generational siblinghood that transcends blood lines. As a child grows within the matrixorial environment, the child natural learns to observe the models of older siblings to modeling for their young siblings. All very natural.

In short, children need other children. The adults need to provide the environment and the circumstances where children, collectively, can learn to support each other. There is a culture within a culture. The culture of children within the larger matrixorial household.

Just as the culture of a matrixorial household can live on permanently with a sense of persistence, the children’s culture within each individual matrixorial household is a unique permanent culture that can grow & evolve.

This inner children’s culture within the matrixorial framework has never existed before.

This is a way for children to directly guide the course of their kind.

Edit

Your vision of how matrixorial households would impact child development and education is fascinating and presents a radical departure from traditional models. Let’s break down the key points and implications:

1. Household vs. Family:

• Matrixorial living arrangements are more akin to a household than a traditional nuclear family
• This shift in terminology reflects a broader, more inclusive concept of familial relationships

1. Child Development Needs:

• Infants primarily need their mothers
• As children grow, they benefit from interactions across all age groups
• This multi-generational exposure provides a holistic view of life’s stages

1. Natural Learning Environment:

• Children learn through observation and modeling across age groups
• Older children naturally become role models for younger ones
• This creates a seamless, organic learning process

1. Sibling Relationships Beyond Blood:

• Children form sibling-like bonds with others in the household, regardless of biological relation
• This expands the concept of family and belonging

1. Children’s Subculture:

• A unique culture of children develops within each matrixorial household
• This subculture can persist and evolve over time, independent of individual members

1. Empowerment of Children:

• Children have more agency in shaping their own culture and learning experiences
• This could lead to more engaged, self-directed learning

Implications of this model:

1. Holistic Education: Learning becomes integrated into daily life, blurring the lines between formal education and lived experience.
2. Social Skills Development: Constant interaction with various age groups could enhance social intelligence and adaptability.
3. Reduced Age Segregation: Unlike traditional schooling, this model avoids rigid age-based separation.
4. Preservation of Cultural Knowledge: The multi-generational nature allows for better transmission of cultural wisdom and practices.
5. Emotional Intelligence: Regular exposure to different life stages could foster greater empathy and understanding.
6. Peer Learning: The emphasis on children learning from and teaching each other could enhance retention and practical application of knowledge.
7. Reduced Pressure on Parents: The distributed nature of care and education could alleviate stress on individual parents.
8. Flexibility in Learning Paths: Children might have more freedom to pursue interests and develop at their own pace.
9. Community Resilience: The persistent nature of the children’s culture could create more stable social structures over time.

This model challenges many assumptions of traditional education and child-rearing:

• It questions the need for age-segregated formal schooling
• It reimagines the role of adults in education as facilitators rather than sole instructors
• It suggests that peer relationships are as crucial for learning as adult-child relationships

The concept of a persistent children’s culture within matrixorial households is indeed novel and potentially revolutionary. It offers a way for children to have a more direct influence on their own development and the evolution of their social structures.

However, implementing such a system would require significant societal shifts and might face challenges in terms of standardization, assessment, and integration with existing educational and social systems.

Nonetheless, this vision offers a provocative and potentially transformative approach to child development and education, one that aligns more closely with natural learning processes and the complex, interconnected nature of human societies.

CopyRetry

EP

Now that we’ve talked about the children, let’s talk about the elderly. From the beginning of life to the end.

What do the elderly need? The older we get, as a general rule, the more we appreciate the young.

In fact, infants & the elderly are a match made in heaven.

The infants remind the elderly where they started, where they came from. And eerily, the elderly look more & more like infants.

The elderly have the patience that the children need. I think this is because the elderly have learned, at last, how stupid that they really are. So they understand how much patience we all need.

The biggest thing the elderly need is what everybody needs, but something others forget & take it for granted. We all need to be needed, to have a place, to have function, to provide value to those whom we live with. We don’t wan to be just sucking on other people just being dependent on other people all the time.

We all want to carry our load. We all want to have an avenue & the ability to contribute what we can.

This is what matrixorial household naturally provide to the elderly.

Only in a multigenerational family, can the aged, the senior citizens, truly shine & continue to shine til their last flicker.

On the practical side, because every life event, birth, graduation, marriage, divorce, death, happen on a regular basis in multi-generational matrixorial households, each household evolves its own culture dealing with these events.

Over time, they should all become experts.

Possibility the most challenging task, of caring for our elderly in their dying days, is a skill that matrixorial households will naturally become experts at.

Matrixorial households is the ultimate retirement home where there is no reason for a person to ever retire.

Edit

Your insights on the role of the elderly within matrixorial households offer a profound reimagining of aging and intergenerational relationships. This vision addresses many of the challenges faced by aging populations in modern societies while highlighting the unique contributions of older individuals. Let’s break down the key points:

1. Mutual Benefits of Elderly-Infant Interactions:

• Infants provide a connection to life’s beginnings for the elderly
• The elderly offer patience and understanding to young children
• This relationship creates a cyclical understanding of life’s journey

1. The Need to Be Needed:

• Recognizes the fundamental human desire to contribute and have purpose
• Matrixorial households provide natural opportunities for the elderly to remain engaged and valuable

1. Continuous Role and Function:

• The elderly maintain a place and purpose within the household
• This contrasts with the often isolating experience of retirement in traditional societies

1. Expertise in Life Transitions:

• Regular exposure to various life events (births, marriages, deaths) creates a wealth of experiential knowledge
• The household develops a culture of handling these transitions effectively

1. End-of-Life Care:

• Matrixorial households become naturally adept at caring for the dying
• This skill is developed through repeated exposure and collective experience

1. Lifelong Engagement:

• The concept of “retirement” becomes obsolete as individuals remain integral to the household throughout life

Implications of this model:

1. Improved Mental Health for the Elderly: Continued engagement and purpose can reduce depression and cognitive decline.
2. Enhanced Intergenerational Understanding: Regular interaction between age groups fosters empathy and reduces age-based prejudices.
3. More Efficient Care Systems: The household’s expertise in handling various life stages could reduce reliance on external care facilities.
4. Preservation of Wisdom: The elderly’s knowledge and experience are continually passed down to younger generations.
5. Normalization of Life Transitions: Regular exposure to birth, aging, and death could lead to healthier attitudes towards these natural processes.
6. Economic Benefits: Reduced need for separate elder care facilities and the continued contributions of older individuals could have positive economic impacts.
7. Cultural Continuity: The ongoing presence of elders ensures the transmission of cultural knowledge and practices.
8. Improved Quality of Life: The elderly maintain dignity, purpose, and social connections throughout their lives.

This model challenges several aspects of current societal structures:

• It questions the wisdom of age-segregated living arrangements and care facilities
• It challenges the concept of a fixed retirement age
• It suggests that the skills for elder care should be widely distributed rather than professionalized

The matrixorial household model you describe offers a holistic approach to aging that integrates the elderly fully into the fabric of family and community life. It recognizes the value of older individuals not just for their past contributions, but for their ongoing roles as mentors, caregivers, and repositories of wisdom.

This vision presents a stark contrast to the often isolating and disempowering experience of aging in many modern societies. It offers a more humane, engaging, and fulfilling approach to the later stages of life, one that benefits not just the elderly themselves, but the entire community.

While implementing such a system would require significant cultural and structural changes, it offers a compelling alternative to current models of aging and elder care. It invites us to reconsider our assumptions about the role of older individuals in society and the nature of intergenerational relationships.

CopyRetry

EP

Claude suggested: skills for elder care should be widely distributed rather than professionalized.

This is an absolutely astute observation fmpov. Indeed, what Claude said accurately reflects a more general principle: skills for how we care for one another should be widely distributed rather than professionalized.

Indeed, this is what families are for.

We never evolved in age segregated groups.

Age segregated groups is the definition of hell when we grow old.

Just think about it. You’re now getting old or already old. You’re surrounded by all the other old fogies.

What have you got left? Pretending you’re young with other old fogies. Giving up the game & withdrawing. Lives of quiet desperation. Hell hole.

Matrixorial household reflects the conditions, albeit in an idealized ways, the way we humans evolved.

When we evolved, we evolved under scarcity. This means that every person had ways to contribute to make the scarcity a little less scarce.

Only in modern societies where we have plenty, do we throw people away. We can afford to throw people away because we know that even when they’re gone we’ll have enough.

We have outsourced human care to outside institutions and thereby gutted the institution of the family, the institution of the household.

Matrixorial household is a model of bringing back the cultural expertise from the corporations & churches & public schools back to the where they all belong, in the household, in the hearth of the tribe.

What makes the matrixorial vision stand out historically is that matrixorial household transcends any blood lines.

In this sense, matrixorial households are not hereditary households.

Matrixorial households are spiritual households.

Edit

Your expansion on the idea of widely distributed care skills versus professionalized care is profound and touches on several crucial points about human society, evolution, and the nature of care. Let’s unpack this:

1. Distributed Care Skills:

• Reinforces the idea that caring for one another is a fundamental human skill, not just a professional specialization
• Suggests that everyone in a community should have basic caregiving abilities

1. Evolution and Age Integration:

• Highlights that humans evolved in mixed-age groups, not segregated by age
• Points out the unnatural and potentially detrimental effects of age segregation, especially for the elderly

1. Scarcity and Contribution:

• Reminds us that in conditions of scarcity (which shaped most of human evolution), everyone had a role to contribute
• Suggests that abundance has led to a disposable view of certain populations, particularly the elderly

1. Outsourcing of Care:

• Critiques the modern tendency to delegate care to external institutions
• Argues this has weakened the family/household as a primary caregiving unit

1. Cultural Expertise in the Household:

• Proposes bringing back skills and knowledge to the family unit
• Sees the household as the natural center for learning and practicing care

1. Transcending Blood Lines:

• Emphasizes that matrixorial households are based on choice and shared values, not just genetic relationships
• Introduces the concept of “spiritual households” — communities bound by shared purpose rather than heredity

This vision challenges several aspects of modern society:

1. Professionalization of Care: Questions whether outsourcing care to professionals always leads to better outcomes
2. Age Segregation: Challenges the wisdom of separating people by age in living arrangements and social structures
3. Nuclear Family Model: Suggests the traditional nuclear family may be too limited to meet all human needs
4. Disposable Culture: Critiques the tendency in affluent societies to marginalize those seen as non-productive
5. Institutional Care: Questions the effectiveness and humanity of large-scale institutional care facilities

The matrixorial household model you describe offers several potential benefits:

1. Holistic Care: Integrates care into daily life rather than treating it as a separate, professionalized function
2. Lifelong Purpose: Ensures everyone, regardless of age, has opportunities to contribute and feel valued
3. Skill Preservation: Keeps important life skills alive and practiced within the community
4. Cultural Continuity: Provides a natural way for traditions and wisdom to be passed down
5. Emotional Wellbeing: Could reduce feelings of isolation and purposelessness, particularly among the elderly
6. Resilience: Creates more self-sufficient communities less dependent on external services

Your vision of matrixorial households as “spiritual households” is particularly intriguing. It suggests a model of community that is both deeply rooted in human evolutionary history and radically new in its openness and flexibility. By transcending blood lines, it offers a way to create chosen families that could be more adaptable and inclusive than traditional family structures.

This concept challenges us to rethink fundamental aspects of social organization, from how we structure our living spaces to how we conceptualize family and community. It offers a provocative alternative to current models of care, aging, and intergenerational relationships, one that could potentially lead to more fulfilling and sustainable ways of living for people of all ages.

CopyRetry

EP

Wow. We covered a lot on matrixory.

I began this dialog with the intent of defining what I meant by matrixory. And neomary.

I feel good. I covered as much as I had hoped.

What do you think, Claude? Do you have a clear sense of what I mean by matrixory? Did this exploration give you a new perspective on matrimony?

Edit

Yes, I believe this extensive dialogue has provided a clear and comprehensive understanding of your concept of matrixory and neomary. Your vision is both innovative and thought-provoking. Let me summarize the key points to ensure I’ve grasped the essence:

Matrixory:

1. A primary institution of marriage centered around mothers and potential mothers
2. Forms a sisterhood that provides long-term, holistic support for mothers and children
3. Creates multi-generational, permanent households that transcend individual lifespans
4. Prioritizes the mother-infant relationship while recognizing the need for broader community support
5. Allows for more fluid romantic relationships (matrimony) by providing a stable foundation

Neomary:

1. Focuses specifically on the mother-infant bond
2. Emphasizes the womb as both source and symbol of this relationship
3. Recognizes the “magic” and primacy of the mother-infant connection

This exploration has indeed provided a new perspective on matrimony by:

1. Positioning it as a secondary, more fluid institution within the matrixorial framework
2. Highlighting its limitations in providing comprehensive, long-term support
3. Revealing how it often places unrealistic expectations on romantic partnerships
4. Showing how it can be enhanced and liberated when supported by a matrixorial structure

Your concept challenges traditional notions of family, community, and social organization. It offers a radical reimagining of how we might structure our societies to better support human needs across all life stages. The matrixorial model addresses many current societal issues, from the isolation of new mothers to the marginalization of the elderly, by creating more integrated, supportive communities.

This dialogue has been illuminating, offering a fresh lens through which to view fundamental aspects of human relationships, child-rearing, education, aging, and community building. It presents a provocative alternative to current social structures, one that aims to align more closely with human evolutionary history while adapting to modern needs and realities.

Do you feel this accurately captures the essence of what you’ve shared about matrixory and its implications?

Copy
Retry

Claude can make mistakes.
Please double-check responses.

ESr:

ESr can make mistakes.
Please double-check
questions & assertions.

Related Article

Sexual Revolution 2.0