Yes, but it wouldn’t be relevant to Michelle Obama’s point.
Jim Balter
81

According to the facts you presented it would be an equally true statement if I just said, “White men built the White House.”

“Yes, but it wouldn’t be relevant to Michelle Obama’s point.”

I obviously wasn’t suggesting it as a phrase to be used by Michelle Obama, now was I?

It was a matter of true or false statements. All she had to do turn her false statement into a true statement would have been to include the words “in part.” The White House was built in part by slave labor. That’s a true sentence.

But as I said, and I know this is hard for you, so I’ll type slow. It would be equally true to state that the White House was built by white Irish men. And just to be perfectly clear, that’s a statement to make an example outside the realm of Obama’s speech.

Of course, you’ll still miss the point because that’s what leftists specialize in. But other people will get it. People who don’t divide Caucasians into two groups: Either White-Guilt-Ridden-Cucks or Racists. Some people just think that words mean things and it’s the speaker’s responsibility to make themselves understood. But your mental defect is, if the speaker isn’t white, then the ONLY reason for the correction or objection must be racism. And with that limitation to your thought process, you’re disabled.